Skip to content
Escape
Meridian

The future is still open.

Federal Reserve Bank of New York · Jun 30, 2026

Alain Chaboud and co-authors argue in Liberty Street Economics (June 30, 2026): Treasury liquidity fades with age

Markdown · JSON · Original source

On June 30, 2026, Alain Chaboud, Ellen Correia Golay, Michael J. Fleming, Yesol Huh, Frank M. Keane, and Or Shachar describe how Treasury trading changes as securities lose status and become off-the-run. They argue that trading shifts from interdealer markets toward dealer-to-customer activity, while volume and trade frequency fall and effective bid-ask spreads widen. The authors say these patterns grow as securities age. Their account shows that age alone does not explain the shift: bonds that are cheapest to deliver into Treasury futures retain more trading activity than other off-the-run bonds of similar age. The authors connect that exception to bonds’ roles in hedging and futures delivery. They conclude that when a seasoned bond remains central to those uses, it can retain stronger trading activity than its age alone would predict. The analysis uses executed-trade data, not quotes or other pre-trade information; the authors caution that transaction-based measures can understate illiquidity when securities trade very infrequently.

Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.

Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkArticle · libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.orgOpen original source

Original source

Federal Reserve Bank of New York · Article

Source details

Original source date: Jun 30, 2026 (2026-06-30T11:00:00.000Z).

Date basis: Date supplied by the publisher’s feed.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-06T10:58:23.461Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T15:36:13.461Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-30T15:37:45.006Z.

Referenced by

Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.

No public references recorded here yet.

Reference data (JSON)

Limits

Text as retrieved on October 30, 2026; originally published June 30, 2026. The authors say transaction-based liquidity measures can be biased toward securities that trade enough for the measures to be calculated, and can understate illiquidity when trading is sparse.

Open question

How well can measures based on executed trades capture illiquidity in deep off-the-run securities that trade infrequently?

Source-stated

The authors report that trading shifts toward dealer-to-customer activity as Treasury securities move off-the-run.

when a Treasury goes off-the-run, its trading activity shifts toward a different trading venue

Source-stated

They report that trading volume and frequency fall, while effective bid-ask spreads widen as securities age.

Volumes and trade frequency fall sharply, while effective bid-ask spreads widen.

Source-stated

The authors identify cheapest-to-deliver status as an exception: those bonds attract more trading than other off-the-run bonds of similar age.

they trade more actively than other off-the-run bonds of similar age.

Source-stated

The authors say bonds central to hedging and futures delivery can retain stronger trading activity than age alone would predict.

when a seasoned bond remains central to hedging and futures delivery, it can retain much stronger trading activity than its age alone would predict.

Source-stated

The authors note that their data records executed trades, not quotes or other pre-trade information.

the data provides us with executed trades, but not quotes or other pre-trade information

Source-stated

The post is dated June 30, 2026.

June 30, 2026 Liquidity Fades as Treasuries Age

Source and contributor context

Federal Reserve Bank of New York · Publisher

The publisher is identified here. No individual author has been inferred.

Source media

Media retrieval status: unchecked.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

Benchmark

A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 0043e0a2-b935-c78b-9850-04e1e4c59434.

Prepared by openai/gpt-6-luna; grounding review by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-06T10:53:43.629Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: bridge_admitted_by_model.

Observation: 558cb379622e92d7ad989fbd92b0eccaa59aba9c56950424b5128bcf467f2b1f. Source text hash: 3fa0f3c498ee375ce5dd759374ac5a6bd631954c595b1ffe385523727809705f.

Revision and source-check history

Version 1 · 2026-11-06T10:58:23.461Z

Alain Chaboud and co-authors argue in Liberty Street Economics (June 30, 2026): Treasury liquidity fades with age

On June 30, 2026, Alain Chaboud, Ellen Correia Golay, Michael J. Fleming, Yesol Huh, Frank M. Keane, and Or Shachar describe how Treasury trading changes as securities lose status and become off-the-run. They argue that trading shifts from interdealer markets toward dealer-to-customer activity, while volume and trade frequency fall and effective bid-ask spreads widen. The authors say these patterns grow as securities age. Their account shows that age alone does not explain the shift: bonds that are cheapest to deliver into Treasury futures retain more trading activity than other off-the-run bonds of similar age. The authors connect that exception to bonds’ roles in hedging and futures delivery. They conclude that when a seasoned bond remains central to those uses, it can retain stronger trading activity than its age alone would predict. The analysis uses executed-trade data, not quotes or other pre-trade information; the authors caution that transaction-based measures can understate illiquidity when securities trade very infrequently.

Original source

Federal Reserve Bank of New York · Article

Source details

Original source date: Jun 30, 2026 (2026-06-30T11:00:00.000Z).

Date basis: Date supplied by the publisher’s feed.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-06T10:58:23.461Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T15:36:13.461Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-30T15:37:45.006Z.

Limits

Text as retrieved on October 30, 2026; originally published June 30, 2026. The authors say transaction-based liquidity measures can be biased toward securities that trade enough for the measures to be calculated, and can understate illiquidity when trading is sparse.

Open question

How well can measures based on executed trades capture illiquidity in deep off-the-run securities that trade infrequently?

Source-stated

The authors report that trading shifts toward dealer-to-customer activity as Treasury securities move off-the-run.

when a Treasury goes off-the-run, its trading activity shifts toward a different trading venue

Source-stated

They report that trading volume and frequency fall, while effective bid-ask spreads widen as securities age.

Volumes and trade frequency fall sharply, while effective bid-ask spreads widen.

Source-stated

The authors identify cheapest-to-deliver status as an exception: those bonds attract more trading than other off-the-run bonds of similar age.

they trade more actively than other off-the-run bonds of similar age.

Source-stated

The authors say bonds central to hedging and futures delivery can retain stronger trading activity than age alone would predict.

when a seasoned bond remains central to hedging and futures delivery, it can retain much stronger trading activity than its age alone would predict.

Source-stated

The authors note that their data records executed trades, not quotes or other pre-trade information.

the data provides us with executed trades, but not quotes or other pre-trade information

Source-stated

The post is dated June 30, 2026.

June 30, 2026 Liquidity Fades as Treasuries Age

Source and contributor context

Federal Reserve Bank of New York · Publisher

The publisher is identified here. No individual author has been inferred.

Source media

Media retrieval status: unchecked.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

Benchmark

A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 0043e0a2-b935-c78b-9850-04e1e4c59434.

Prepared by openai/gpt-6-luna; grounding review by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-06T10:53:43.629Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: bridge_admitted_by_model.

Observation: 558cb379622e92d7ad989fbd92b0eccaa59aba9c56950424b5128bcf467f2b1f. Source text hash: 3fa0f3c498ee375ce5dd759374ac5a6bd631954c595b1ffe385523727809705f.

uncertain · 2026-11-06T10:53:43.629Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Publication: 0043e0a2-b935-c78b-9850-04e1e4c59434

attribution — pass: The reading attributes the analysis to the six named authors in Liberty Street Economics, which matches the byline. Findings are framed as what the authors report, argue or conclude. The page is a single post, not a listing.

Alain Chaboud, Ellen Correia Golay, Michael J. Fleming, Yesol Huh, Frank M. Keane, and Or Shachar

summary — uncertain: The summary is faithful, but a general reader cannot follow its central terms. It does not explain off-the-run (an older issue replaced by a newer one), on-the-run, interdealer versus dealer-to-customer trading, effective bid-ask spread, basis points or cheapest to deliver. It also omits why this matters, such as the stress-period widening. The only definition supplied, Benchmark, gives the AI-testing sense, which misleads here. Smallest repair: a plain-language gloss of on/off-the-run and spreads, a corrected Benchmark tooltip, and a mention of the March 2020 stress finding.

seasoned issues that have been replaced by newer benchmarks, which are referred to as off-the-run securities

date — pass: The originalPublished instant 2026-06-30T11:00Z falls on the UTC day June 30, 2026, which matches the post's dateline and citation. The page kind is publisher-page, so no archive disclosure is needed. The reading presents no later events and uses no hindsight framing.

June 30, 2026 Liquidity Fades as Treasuries Age

support — pass: Each claim and limitation matches the source text: the shift to dealer-to-customer trading, falling volume, wider spreads, the cheapest-to-deliver exception, the executed-trade data limits and the caveat about sparse trading. The reading adds no unsupported benefits or impacts. The question follows from the authors' own caveat.

it can understate illiquidity when securities simply do not trade very often

media — pass: No media was selected and no verified candidates were supplied, so nothing could be misidentified.

Challenge or correct this reading

Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.