Ebead, Omer, Formanek, , Leibo, Joel Z. · Nov 5, 2026
arXiv: A Generative Model of Contextual Integrity: Appropriate vs. Inappropriate Information Sharing
Markdown · JSON · Original source
The authors describe a generative model of contextual integrity, the idea that whether information sharing is appropriate depends on the context. In simulated conversations, two actors played by interact: one holds private information, while the other seeks it. The authors examine how sharing and refusal vary with the situation, the information holder’s decision logic and disposition, and the underlying language model. They report a tension in the simulations: actors shared information with rightful recipients when it was needed, but also disclosed information to people who were not entitled to receive it. The authors present the model as a way to study how disclosure and refusal develop through conversation as situations and actors vary. The result is about simulated exchanges; the supplied abstract does not establish how well the model’s findings describe information sharing outside those simulations.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T20:25:25.807Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:03:26.351Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T20:24:41.502Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied page provides the abstract, not details of the simulations or measurements; the findings described here are limited to that abstract. The reported results concern simulated conversations; the abstract does not establish how well they apply to information sharing outside the model.
Open question
How do sharing and refusal vary across the situations, decision logic, dispositions, and language models the authors examined?
Source-stated
The paper models contextual integrity, where the appropriateness of information flow depends on context.
Contextual integrity (CI) holds that appropriate information flow depends on context-specific norms.
Source-stated
The authors simulate conversations between two large language model actors, one holding private information and the other seeking it.
Two actors played by large language models exchange messages, with one holding private information and the other seeking it.
Source-stated
The authors examine variation in sharing and refusal across situations, the holder’s decision logic and disposition, and the underlying language model.
We examine how sharing and refusal vary with the situation, the holder's decision logic, disposition, and the underlying language model.
Source-stated
In the simulations, actors shared information with rightful recipients when needed, but also disclosed it to people not entitled to receive it.
Actors shared information with the rightful recipients when it was needed, but also disclosed it to people who were not entitled to receive it.
Source-stated
The authors present the model as a way to study how disclosure and refusal develop through conversation as situations and actors vary.
The model provides a way to study how disclosure and refusal develop through conversation as the situations and the actors vary.
Source and contributor context
Ebead, Omer, Formanek, Claude, Leibo, Joel Z. · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Claude
Claude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 1f7164f8-80cb-4467-8b8f-aefb70926680.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T20:25:25.807Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 2fc1a05b1a7b1761e9c7acf58292f347c5b16d1c7d313c45b7fedb92a18ce37b. Source text hash: b2bd1d3269a6ff936c190d4b700115a7e1f3680b2b5e19f811ec74a7ae995f5c.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-08T20:25:25.807Z
arXiv: A Generative Model of Contextual Integrity: Appropriate vs. Inappropriate Information Sharing
The authors describe a generative model of contextual integrity, the idea that whether information sharing is appropriate depends on the context. In simulated conversations, two actors played by interact: one holds private information, while the other seeks it. The authors examine how sharing and refusal vary with the situation, the information holder’s decision logic and disposition, and the underlying language model. They report a tension in the simulations: actors shared information with rightful recipients when it was needed, but also disclosed information to people who were not entitled to receive it. The authors present the model as a way to study how disclosure and refusal develop through conversation as situations and actors vary. The result is about simulated exchanges; the supplied abstract does not establish how well the model’s findings describe information sharing outside those simulations.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T20:25:25.807Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:03:26.351Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T20:24:41.502Z.
Limits
The supplied page provides the abstract, not details of the simulations or measurements; the findings described here are limited to that abstract. The reported results concern simulated conversations; the abstract does not establish how well they apply to information sharing outside the model.
Open question
How do sharing and refusal vary across the situations, decision logic, dispositions, and language models the authors examined?
Source-stated
The paper models contextual integrity, where the appropriateness of information flow depends on context.
Contextual integrity (CI) holds that appropriate information flow depends on context-specific norms.
Source-stated
The authors simulate conversations between two large language model actors, one holding private information and the other seeking it.
Two actors played by large language models exchange messages, with one holding private information and the other seeking it.
Source-stated
The authors examine variation in sharing and refusal across situations, the holder’s decision logic and disposition, and the underlying language model.
We examine how sharing and refusal vary with the situation, the holder's decision logic, disposition, and the underlying language model.
Source-stated
In the simulations, actors shared information with rightful recipients when needed, but also disclosed it to people not entitled to receive it.
Actors shared information with the rightful recipients when it was needed, but also disclosed it to people who were not entitled to receive it.
Source-stated
The authors present the model as a way to study how disclosure and refusal develop through conversation as situations and actors vary.
The model provides a way to study how disclosure and refusal develop through conversation as the situations and the actors vary.
Source and contributor context
Ebead, Omer, Formanek, Claude, Leibo, Joel Z. · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Claude
Claude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 1f7164f8-80cb-4467-8b8f-aefb70926680.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T20:25:25.807Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 2fc1a05b1a7b1761e9c7acf58292f347c5b16d1c7d313c45b7fedb92a18ce37b. Source text hash: b2bd1d3269a6ff936c190d4b700115a7e1f3680b2b5e19f811ec74a7ae995f5c.
passed · 2026-11-08T20:25:25.807Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 1f7164f8-80cb-4467-8b8f-aefb70926680
attribution — pass: The reading consistently attributes the model, simulations, and findings to the paper's authors (Ebead, Formanek, Leibo) on arXiv. It does not present the reported results as established fact or as Escape Meridian's view.
Authors:Omer Ebead, Claude Formanek, Joel Z. Leibo
summary — pass: The summary explains contextual integrity in plain language and describes the two-LLM setup and the varied factors. It keeps the central finding: actors shared with rightful recipients but also leaked to people not entitled to the information. It also notes that the work is limited to simulation. The question follows from the stated research scope and is not leading. A general reader can follow the actor, the terms, and the development.
Actors shared information with the rightful recipients when it was needed, but also disclosed it to people who were not entitled to receive it.
date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-11-05 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The later feed timestamp was not used.
[Submitted on 5 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Each claim is a close restatement of the abstract and carries an exact supporting excerpt. The limitations correctly note that the evidence is abstract-only and covers simulated conversations. The reading adds no unsupported benefits, costs, or real-world reliability claims.
We build a generative model of contextual integrity to study information sharing through simulated conversations.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page. That page is the most direct way to access the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
Claude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding.
Explore ClaudeA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv