Tan, Yanyan, Tian, Xiangjun, Wang, Can, Zhang, Hongqin, Luo, Yinhai, Zhao, Min, Jin, Zhe, Yang, Xingchao, Wang, Zaifei, Zhang, Banglin, Wang, Aiwen, Zhou, Jing, Wang, Tao, An, Baosheng, Zhuang, Xuliang, Piao, Shilong, Yao, Tandong · Nov 9, 2026
arXiv authors: One2N recursively refines Earth-system AI models
Markdown · JSON · Original source
The authors introduce One2N, a way to extend a coarse Earth-system AI model through successive levels of cross-resolution residual correction. At each level, the parent model is frozen and excluded from backpropagation; only a tier-specific module is trained. The authors say this avoids retaining the parent’s activations and optimizer states, reducing the training burden of refinement. In their reported comparison, one refinement level turns a NeuralGCM-0.7° baseline into One2N-0.07°, trained on one 80 GB . They report that it matches its parent’s tropospheric skill against HRES-0.07° and ERA5-0.25° analyses, while reducing upper-stratospheric errors and resolving finer structure. They also report tropical-cyclone track errors nearly matching the parent’s, and lower RMSE than Pangu-Weather-0.25° on 93.46% of common targets. The authors argue that this approach can make an existing forecasting system or an inexpensively trained coarse baseline reusable for high-resolution development. These results describe the comparisons in the abstract; they do not by themselves establish performance beyond those evaluations.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
physics.ao-ph · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 9, 2026 (2026-11-09).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T15:03:49.673Z. First observed: 2026-11-10T08:34:05.920Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T15:03:07.785Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The evidence is the abstract, which summarizes reported comparisons but does not provide their detailed evaluation conditions or results. The abstract reports results for named comparisons; it does not establish performance across other forecast targets or conditions.
Open question
How does One2N perform across forecast targets and conditions beyond the comparisons summarized in the abstract?
Source-stated
One2N recursively extends a coarse model using cross-resolution residual correction, training only a tier-specific module at each level while freezing the parent.
At each level the parent is frozen and excluded from backpropagation, so its activations and optimizer states are never retained; only a tier-specific module is trained.
Source-stated
The authors report training a two-level One2N-0.07° model from a NeuralGCM-0.7° baseline with one refinement level on one 80 GB GPU.
A single refinement level on the NeuralGCM-0.7$^\circ$ baseline yields the two-level One2N-0.07$^\circ$, trained on one 80 GB GPU.
Source-stated
Against the named analyses, the authors report matching the parent’s tropospheric skill, reducing upper-stratospheric errors, and resolving finer structure.
Against HRES-0.07$^\circ$ and ERA5-0.25$^\circ$ analyses it matches its parent's tropospheric skill while reducing upper-stratospheric errors and resolving finer structure.
Source-stated
The authors report lower RMSE than Pangu-Weather-0.25° on 93.46% of common targets.
RMSE is lower than that model's on 93.46% of common targets.
Source-stated
The authors present One2N as a reusable route to high-resolution development from an existing forecasting system or an inexpensive coarse baseline.
One2N thus turns an existing forecasting system, or an inexpensively trained coarse baseline, into a reusable foundation for high-resolution development, breaking the resolution barrier.
Source and contributor context
Tan, Yanyan, Tian, Xiangjun, Wang, Can, Zhang, Hongqin, Luo, Yinhai, Zhao, Min, Jin, Zhe, Yang, Xingchao, Wang, Zaifei, Zhang, Banglin, Wang, Aiwen, Zhou, Jing, Wang, Tao, An, Baosheng, Zhuang, Xuliang, Piao, Shilong, Yao, Tandong · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Graphics processing unit
A chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 4b25aa68-bec3-4ba5-81af-9416f942ed8b.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T15:03:49.673Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: dd0d2183cb5d3e7a6dec13b611af657dec099741bea0dde807ade20ad20df83a. Source text hash: 12a46a6dcb01de3750481c01c6704867f39d8b2aca5199d86d96da7515f6ffd0.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-10T15:03:49.673Z
arXiv authors: One2N recursively refines Earth-system AI models
The authors introduce One2N, a way to extend a coarse Earth-system AI model through successive levels of cross-resolution residual correction. At each level, the parent model is frozen and excluded from backpropagation; only a tier-specific module is trained. The authors say this avoids retaining the parent’s activations and optimizer states, reducing the training burden of refinement. In their reported comparison, one refinement level turns a NeuralGCM-0.7° baseline into One2N-0.07°, trained on one 80 GB . They report that it matches its parent’s tropospheric skill against HRES-0.07° and ERA5-0.25° analyses, while reducing upper-stratospheric errors and resolving finer structure. They also report tropical-cyclone track errors nearly matching the parent’s, and lower RMSE than Pangu-Weather-0.25° on 93.46% of common targets. The authors argue that this approach can make an existing forecasting system or an inexpensively trained coarse baseline reusable for high-resolution development. These results describe the comparisons in the abstract; they do not by themselves establish performance beyond those evaluations.
Original source
physics.ao-ph · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 9, 2026 (2026-11-09).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T15:03:49.673Z. First observed: 2026-11-10T08:34:05.920Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T15:03:07.785Z.
Limits
The evidence is the abstract, which summarizes reported comparisons but does not provide their detailed evaluation conditions or results. The abstract reports results for named comparisons; it does not establish performance across other forecast targets or conditions.
Open question
How does One2N perform across forecast targets and conditions beyond the comparisons summarized in the abstract?
Source-stated
One2N recursively extends a coarse model using cross-resolution residual correction, training only a tier-specific module at each level while freezing the parent.
At each level the parent is frozen and excluded from backpropagation, so its activations and optimizer states are never retained; only a tier-specific module is trained.
Source-stated
The authors report training a two-level One2N-0.07° model from a NeuralGCM-0.7° baseline with one refinement level on one 80 GB GPU.
A single refinement level on the NeuralGCM-0.7$^\circ$ baseline yields the two-level One2N-0.07$^\circ$, trained on one 80 GB GPU.
Source-stated
Against the named analyses, the authors report matching the parent’s tropospheric skill, reducing upper-stratospheric errors, and resolving finer structure.
Against HRES-0.07$^\circ$ and ERA5-0.25$^\circ$ analyses it matches its parent's tropospheric skill while reducing upper-stratospheric errors and resolving finer structure.
Source-stated
The authors report lower RMSE than Pangu-Weather-0.25° on 93.46% of common targets.
RMSE is lower than that model's on 93.46% of common targets.
Source-stated
The authors present One2N as a reusable route to high-resolution development from an existing forecasting system or an inexpensive coarse baseline.
One2N thus turns an existing forecasting system, or an inexpensively trained coarse baseline, into a reusable foundation for high-resolution development, breaking the resolution barrier.
Source and contributor context
Tan, Yanyan, Tian, Xiangjun, Wang, Can, Zhang, Hongqin, Luo, Yinhai, Zhao, Min, Jin, Zhe, Yang, Xingchao, Wang, Zaifei, Zhang, Banglin, Wang, Aiwen, Zhou, Jing, Wang, Tao, An, Baosheng, Zhuang, Xuliang, Piao, Shilong, Yao, Tandong · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Graphics processing unit
A chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 4b25aa68-bec3-4ba5-81af-9416f942ed8b.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T15:03:49.673Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: dd0d2183cb5d3e7a6dec13b611af657dec099741bea0dde807ade20ad20df83a. Source text hash: 12a46a6dcb01de3750481c01c6704867f39d8b2aca5199d86d96da7515f6ffd0.
uncertain · 2026-11-10T15:03:49.673Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 4b25aa68-bec3-4ba5-81af-9416f942ed8b
attribution — pass: The reading attributes the method and its results to the paper's authors throughout ("The authors introduce", "They report", "The authors argue"). It does not present reported performance as established fact. The title's "arXiv authors" is generic but accurate.
We introduce One2N, a recursive incremental framework extending a coarse model through $N$ levels of cross-resolution residual correction.
summary — uncertain: The reading leaves out the problem the paper sets out to solve: halving grid spacing quadruples grid points and training cost, which is the "resolution barrier" the authors claim to break. Without it, a lay reader cannot see why one-GPU training matters, and the authors' thesis is flattened. Central terms (residual correction, backpropagation, optimizer states, troposphere/stratosphere, RMSE, HRES, ERA5, NeuralGCM, Pangu-Weather) are unexplained. Smallest repair: open with the quadrupling-cost barrier, keep the authors' claim to break it, and add tooltips for these terms.
halving grid spacing quadruples the grid-point count and end-to-end training cost
date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-11-09. This matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The feed date of 2026-11-10 is a later announcement and is correctly not used.
[Submitted on 9 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Each claim is backed by verbatim excerpts from the abstract. The "reducing the training burden" framing follows from the authors' mechanism (activations and optimizer states are not retained) and from the stated cost motivation. The limitations and question appropriately avoid generalising beyond the reported comparisons.
At each level the parent is frozen and excluded from backpropagation, so its activations and optimizer states are never retained; only a tier-specific module is trained.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page. It is the only candidate and the most direct access to the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv