Skip to content
Escape
Meridian

The future is still open.

Yu, Tao, Zhang, Xinyu, Chen, Qianqian, Xiang, Xiaoneng, Kwangyang, Chia, Huang, Xingchen, Chen, Ran, Ding, Yangkai, Wang, Zheng, Hong, Yeo Boon, Gan, Bingzheng, Hu, Enrui, Cheng, Shuo, Li, Deyang, Shi, Ruifeng, Wang, Hongbo, Ye, Qi, Jin, Xuefeng, Zhao, Zhangchun · Aug 28, 2026

arXiv authors present openJiuwen for Long-Horizon Coding Agents

Markdown · JSON · Original source

The authors of the paper on openJiuwen argue that long-horizon coding agents need harnesses that can be composed and adapted as tasks evolve. The paper calls these needs Structural Composability and Runtime Adaptivity: developers should be able to assemble and reconfigure capabilities without rebuilding orchestration, while new evidence from a task should influence later runtime decisions. The authors present openJiuwen as an open-source harness with a shared execution substrate and Rail-based capability composition across single agents, delegated sub-agents, and Swarm Flow. They say it adapts framework-controlled runtime decisions around a fixed model policy, using evolving evidence to affect context, feedback, and task control. The paper reports results on SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.6% and 87.19%, respectively. It says these exceed the strongest selected official-leaderboard point estimates by 3.4 and 3.39 percentage points. These are results, not evidence in this abstract of performance across all coding work. The paper’s case is that evolving task evidence should shape runtime decisions, while developers need ways to compose capabilities without rebuilding orchestration.

Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.

arXiv cs.AIArticle · arxiv.orgOpen original source

Original source

cs.AI · Article

Source details

Original source date: Aug 28, 2026 (2026-08-28).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T01:54:16.303Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:07:30.012Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T01:53:05.249Z.

Referenced by

Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.

No public references recorded here yet.

Reference data (JSON)

Limits

The supplied evidence is the page abstract, not the paper’s full methods or results; it does not provide details needed to assess the setups or how results vary across tasks. The reported scores concern SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1; the supplied abstract does not report results on other coding tasks.

Open question

How well do openJiuwen’s reported results carry over to coding tasks beyond the two named ?

Source-stated

The authors describe two challenges for harnesses used by long-horizon coding agents: composing capabilities and adapting runtime decisions as task evidence changes.

We characterize these challenges as Structural Composability and Runtime Adaptivity.

Source-stated

The authors present openJiuwen as an open-source harness that uses a shared execution substrate and Rail-based composition across single agents, delegated sub-agents, and Swarm Flow.

openJiuwen provides a shared execution substrate and Rail-based capability composition across single agents, delegated sub-agents, and Swarm Flow

Source-stated

The authors say openJiuwen adapts framework-controlled runtime decisions around a fixed model policy, using evolving evidence to affect context, feedback, and task control.

It further adapts framework-controlled runtime decisions around a fixed model policy, allowing evolving evidence to dynamically affect context, feedback, and task control toward successful completion.

Source-stated

The abstract reports 82.6% on SWE-bench Verified and 87.19% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, exceeding the strongest selected official-leaderboard point estimates by 3.4 and 3.39 percentage points, respectively.

it achieves 82.6% and 87.19%, respectively, exceeding the strongest selected official-leaderboard point estimates by 3.4 and 3.39 percentage points.

Escape Meridian interpretation

The abstract’s reported benchmark results establish performance on the two named evaluations, but do not by themselves establish performance on other coding tasks.

We systematically evaluate openJiuwen on SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1

Source and contributor context

Yu, Tao, Zhang, Xinyu, Chen, Qianqian, Xiang, Xiaoneng, Kwangyang, Chia, Huang, Xingchen, Chen, Ran, Ding, Yangkai, Wang, Zheng, Hong, Yeo Boon, Gan, Bingzheng, Hu, Enrui, Cheng, Shuo, Li, Deyang, Shi, Ruifeng, Wang, Hongbo, Ye, Qi, Jin, Xuefeng, Zhao, Zhangchun · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.

Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

Benchmark

A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.

arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 766dca55-f464-4e7a-863e-3b7f413ff7e2.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T01:54:16.303Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.

Observation: 82efea5360749c87e1439783b0da9e043fa8e0ca72f23439c96a6ec6ed8ce37e. Source text hash: 79b7ad863e19128d01e128d4e17ed19da51ea3675db81ae44790a263bb7857ab.

Revision and source-check history

Version 1 · 2026-11-09T01:54:16.303Z

arXiv authors present openJiuwen for Long-Horizon Coding Agents

The authors of the paper on openJiuwen argue that long-horizon coding agents need harnesses that can be composed and adapted as tasks evolve. The paper calls these needs Structural Composability and Runtime Adaptivity: developers should be able to assemble and reconfigure capabilities without rebuilding orchestration, while new evidence from a task should influence later runtime decisions. The authors present openJiuwen as an open-source harness with a shared execution substrate and Rail-based capability composition across single agents, delegated sub-agents, and Swarm Flow. They say it adapts framework-controlled runtime decisions around a fixed model policy, using evolving evidence to affect context, feedback, and task control. The paper reports results on SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.6% and 87.19%, respectively. It says these exceed the strongest selected official-leaderboard point estimates by 3.4 and 3.39 percentage points. These are results, not evidence in this abstract of performance across all coding work. The paper’s case is that evolving task evidence should shape runtime decisions, while developers need ways to compose capabilities without rebuilding orchestration.

Original source

cs.AI · Article

Source details

Original source date: Aug 28, 2026 (2026-08-28).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T01:54:16.303Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:07:30.012Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T01:53:05.249Z.

Limits

The supplied evidence is the page abstract, not the paper’s full methods or results; it does not provide details needed to assess the setups or how results vary across tasks. The reported scores concern SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1; the supplied abstract does not report results on other coding tasks.

Open question

How well do openJiuwen’s reported results carry over to coding tasks beyond the two named ?

Source-stated

The authors describe two challenges for harnesses used by long-horizon coding agents: composing capabilities and adapting runtime decisions as task evidence changes.

We characterize these challenges as Structural Composability and Runtime Adaptivity.

Source-stated

The authors present openJiuwen as an open-source harness that uses a shared execution substrate and Rail-based composition across single agents, delegated sub-agents, and Swarm Flow.

openJiuwen provides a shared execution substrate and Rail-based capability composition across single agents, delegated sub-agents, and Swarm Flow

Source-stated

The authors say openJiuwen adapts framework-controlled runtime decisions around a fixed model policy, using evolving evidence to affect context, feedback, and task control.

It further adapts framework-controlled runtime decisions around a fixed model policy, allowing evolving evidence to dynamically affect context, feedback, and task control toward successful completion.

Source-stated

The abstract reports 82.6% on SWE-bench Verified and 87.19% on Terminal-Bench 2.1, exceeding the strongest selected official-leaderboard point estimates by 3.4 and 3.39 percentage points, respectively.

it achieves 82.6% and 87.19%, respectively, exceeding the strongest selected official-leaderboard point estimates by 3.4 and 3.39 percentage points.

Escape Meridian interpretation

The abstract’s reported benchmark results establish performance on the two named evaluations, but do not by themselves establish performance on other coding tasks.

We systematically evaluate openJiuwen on SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.1

Source and contributor context

Yu, Tao, Zhang, Xinyu, Chen, Qianqian, Xiang, Xiaoneng, Kwangyang, Chia, Huang, Xingchen, Chen, Ran, Ding, Yangkai, Wang, Zheng, Hong, Yeo Boon, Gan, Bingzheng, Hu, Enrui, Cheng, Shuo, Li, Deyang, Shi, Ruifeng, Wang, Hongbo, Ye, Qi, Jin, Xuefeng, Zhao, Zhangchun · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.

Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

Benchmark

A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.

arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 766dca55-f464-4e7a-863e-3b7f413ff7e2.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T01:54:16.303Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.

Observation: 82efea5360749c87e1439783b0da9e043fa8e0ca72f23439c96a6ec6ed8ce37e. Source text hash: 79b7ad863e19128d01e128d4e17ed19da51ea3675db81ae44790a263bb7857ab.

uncertain · 2026-11-09T01:54:16.303Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Publication: 766dca55-f464-4e7a-863e-3b7f413ff7e2

attribution — pass: The reading consistently attributes the framing, design claims and benchmark results to the paper's authors on arXiv. It does not present them as established fact or as Escape Meridian's view.

We present openJiuwen, an open-source harness designed for both developer composability and adaptive task execution.

summary — uncertain: The summary is faithful, but the central jargon is unexplained for a non-specialist reader. It never says plainly what an agent harness is (the software around an AI model that manages its tools, steps and context) or what long-horizon coding agents are. It also leaves SWE-bench Verified, Terminal-Bench, Rail-based composition, Swarm Flow and fixed model policy without plain context, and the last sentence repeats earlier points. Smallest repair: add one plain-language clause each for harness and for what the two benchmarks measure, kept separate from the source terms. Add tooltips for the remaining terms.

These trends pose two complementary challenges for the agent harness.

date — pass: originalPublished 2026-08-28 matches the v1 submission date. It is not the 5 Nov 2026 revision or the feed date.

[Submitted on 28 Aug 2026 (v1), last revised 5 Nov 2026 (this version, v2)]

support — pass: All source-stated claims match the abstract, including the scores, the margins and the qualifier 'strongest selected official-leaderboard point estimates'. The interpretation claim is labeled and stays conditional: the benchmarks do not establish performance elsewhere. The question follows from the evidence without assuming an answer.

it achieves 82.6% and 87.19%, respectively, exceeding the strongest selected official-leaderboard point estimates by 3.4 and 3.39 percentage points.

media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, the most direct access to the source.

Challenge or correct this reading

Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.