Jiang, Shuli, Pahwa, Khushbu, Zhang, Yuting, Zhang, Yi, Xia, Wei, Soatto, Stefano · Nov 4, 2026
arXiv authors propose learning when LLM agents should consult humans
Markdown · JSON · Original source
In their paper, Shuli Jiang and coauthors argue that an agent should consult a human where that input is valuable to the particular agent doing the later work. The same human judgment may help different agents by different amounts. The authors say human decision capacity does not scale with model capabilities, and consultation opportunities come with a limited budget. They introduce Consultation Value Distillation (CVD): they estimate consultation values offline using Monte Carlo executor rollouts, then train lightweight predictors to allocate a limited consultation budget without rollout-based value estimation at deployment. The paper reports tests across five batch and three sequential settings with two frontier executors. The authors say CVD improves allocation through joint and continuation-aware value learning; independent consultation values remain competitive in several settings. They also report that CVD broadly outperforms direct prompting and Value of Information where applicable, works with substantially less rollout supervision, and enables nearly lossless approximate allocation at low search cost. These are results reported in the abstract; it does not give numerical effect sizes or detail the tested tasks. The proposal makes the human’s contribution part of the allocation problem: not simply whether to ask, but which decision merits a scarce consultation
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 4, 2026 (2026-11-04).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T06:23:05.761Z. First observed: 2026-11-05T05:06:29.845Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T06:17:34.334Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the paper’s abstract; it reports no numerical effect sizes or task-level results for the comparisons. The abstract does not specify how results varied across the settings or the two frontier executors.
Open question
How do the reported allocation results vary across the batch and sequential settings and the two frontier executors?
Source-stated
The authors frame human consultation as allocating limited human decision capacity across multiple opportunities, with value dependent on the downstream executor.
the same human input may benefit different downstream agents differently
Source-stated
CVD estimates consultation values offline with Monte Carlo executor rollouts and distills them into lightweight predictors for budgeted allocation, avoiding rollout-based value estimation at deployment.
estimates consultation values offline using Monte Carlo executor rollouts and distills these values into lightweight predictors for budgeted allocation, requiring no rollout-based value estimation at deployment
Source-stated
The authors report that CVD improves allocation across five batch and three sequential settings with two frontier executors.
Across five batch and three sequential settings with two frontier executors, CVD improves allocation
Source-stated
The authors report that CVD broadly outperforms direct prompting and Value of Information where applicable, remains robust with substantially less rollout supervision, and supports nearly lossless approximate allocation at low search cost.
CVD also broadly outperforms direct prompting and Value of Information where applicable, remains robust with substantially less rollout supervision, and enables nearly lossless approximate allocation at low search cost.
Source and contributor context
Jiang, Shuli, Pahwa, Khushbu, Zhang, Yuting, Zhang, Yi, Xia, Wei, Soatto, Stefano · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: c841a43f-bc38-4f60-85e5-9bb7a08df0c7.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T06:23:05.761Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 91b1bd60166ee70b52d344c8d98f12817f7ae01eb76101f6755eda0e2dbff9f3. Source text hash: 6f2557973e709580dd5fde46f0a6bf05dbbb60447f5500488ee395b0fbe724c9.
Correction reason: Removed the unsupported claim that people have limited time; the revised summary attributes the stated constraint to human decision capacity and the limited consultation budget.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-09T06:23:05.761Z · Removed the unsupported claim that people have limited time; the revised summary attributes the stated constraint to human decision capacity and the limited consultation budget.
arXiv authors propose learning when LLM agents should consult humans
In their paper, Shuli Jiang and coauthors argue that an agent should consult a human where that input is valuable to the particular agent doing the later work. The same human judgment may help different agents by different amounts. The authors say human decision capacity does not scale with model capabilities, and consultation opportunities come with a limited budget. They introduce Consultation Value Distillation (CVD): they estimate consultation values offline using Monte Carlo executor rollouts, then train lightweight predictors to allocate a limited consultation budget without rollout-based value estimation at deployment. The paper reports tests across five batch and three sequential settings with two frontier executors. The authors say CVD improves allocation through joint and continuation-aware value learning; independent consultation values remain competitive in several settings. They also report that CVD broadly outperforms direct prompting and Value of Information where applicable, works with substantially less rollout supervision, and enables nearly lossless approximate allocation at low search cost. These are results reported in the abstract; it does not give numerical effect sizes or detail the tested tasks. The proposal makes the human’s contribution part of the allocation problem: not simply whether to ask, but which decision merits a scarce consultation
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 4, 2026 (2026-11-04).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T06:23:05.761Z. First observed: 2026-11-05T05:06:29.845Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T06:17:34.334Z.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the paper’s abstract; it reports no numerical effect sizes or task-level results for the comparisons. The abstract does not specify how results varied across the settings or the two frontier executors.
Open question
How do the reported allocation results vary across the batch and sequential settings and the two frontier executors?
Source-stated
The authors frame human consultation as allocating limited human decision capacity across multiple opportunities, with value dependent on the downstream executor.
the same human input may benefit different downstream agents differently
Source-stated
CVD estimates consultation values offline with Monte Carlo executor rollouts and distills them into lightweight predictors for budgeted allocation, avoiding rollout-based value estimation at deployment.
estimates consultation values offline using Monte Carlo executor rollouts and distills these values into lightweight predictors for budgeted allocation, requiring no rollout-based value estimation at deployment
Source-stated
The authors report that CVD improves allocation across five batch and three sequential settings with two frontier executors.
Across five batch and three sequential settings with two frontier executors, CVD improves allocation
Source-stated
The authors report that CVD broadly outperforms direct prompting and Value of Information where applicable, remains robust with substantially less rollout supervision, and supports nearly lossless approximate allocation at low search cost.
CVD also broadly outperforms direct prompting and Value of Information where applicable, remains robust with substantially less rollout supervision, and enables nearly lossless approximate allocation at low search cost.
Source and contributor context
Jiang, Shuli, Pahwa, Khushbu, Zhang, Yuting, Zhang, Yi, Xia, Wei, Soatto, Stefano · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: c841a43f-bc38-4f60-85e5-9bb7a08df0c7.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T06:23:05.761Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 91b1bd60166ee70b52d344c8d98f12817f7ae01eb76101f6755eda0e2dbff9f3. Source text hash: 6f2557973e709580dd5fde46f0a6bf05dbbb60447f5500488ee395b0fbe724c9.
Correction reason: Removed the unsupported claim that people have limited time; the revised summary attributes the stated constraint to human decision capacity and the limited consultation budget.
uncertain · 2026-11-09T06:23:05.761Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: c841a43f-bc38-4f60-85e5-9bb7a08df0c7
attribution — pass: The reading attributes the proposal and results to Shuli Jiang and coauthors in an arXiv paper. It frames the results as reported by the authors, not as established fact.
Authors:Shuli Jiang, Khushbu Pahwa, Yuting Zhang, Yi Zhang, Wei Xia, Stefano Soatto
summary — uncertain: The core idea is faithful: under a limited budget, pick which decisions merit consulting a human, with value depending on the executor. But central terms are left unexplained for lay readers. These include Monte Carlo executor rollouts, frontier executors, batch vs sequential settings, joint and continuation-aware value learning, and Value of Information. Smallest repair: add term-library tooltips for these terms. Also restore the source's reason humans matter (private context, authority, or judgments the agent lacks) and add the missing period to the final sentence.
humans remain essential for providing private context, authority, or judgments unavailable to the agent
date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-11-04, which matches the v1 arXiv submission date. The later feed date was correctly not used.
[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Each claim is a source-stated abstract statement. The nuance that independent values remain competitive is preserved. The limitations correctly note the absence of effect sizes and task detail. The question raises a real gap rather than a leading claim, and no benefits are invented.
CVD improves allocation through joint and continuation-aware value learning, while independent consultation values remain competitive in several settings
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. This is the most direct access to the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv