arXiv cs.AI authors propose separating creative process from output

arXiv cs.AI authors propose separating creative process from output

Alon Albalak, Sebastian Gabriel, David B. D'Ambrosio, Joel Lehman and Kenneth O. Stanley argue that AI creativity faces a “creative paradox”: training on examples of past creative success can make those same examples more likely to recur, working against new ideas. Their proposed approach, creative priming (CP), separates the process intended to encourage creativity from the response that process helps produce. A trained priming model generates a prompt-specific primer for a response model. The priming model learns through GRPO, with rewards based on whether its primers lead to responses that are novel, high-quality and diverse. The authors’ central distinction is that this rewards a process for producing creative responses without reinforcing any one response. If it works as intended, the approach could address a tension between learning from creative examples and avoiding repetition of them. The supplied arXiv page presents the proposal in an abstract; it does not provide evaluation results showing whether the method achieves that aim.

Publication: 4d095ec5-74ae-4aed-87ad-486d6743c5ad

attribution — pass: The draft names the five listed authors and attributes the creative paradox argument and the creative priming proposal to them. The title's phrase "arXiv cs.AI authors" is generic but accurate, because the paper is listed in arXiv cs.AI.

Authors:Alon Albalak, Sebastian Gabriel, David B. D'Ambrosio, Joel Lehman, Kenneth O. Stanley

summary — pass: The draft faithfully conveys the paradox, the priming/response split, the GRPO reward criteria and the process-not-product distinction. It plainly explains what a primer does. The question targets the real gap, the lack of shown results. Optional repair: add the authors' stated stakes, that advances like curing diseases or new scientific theories are creative acts, and their thesis that creativity is better modeled as a process. Doing so would show readers why this matters. GRPO could use a term-library tooltip.

Many of the most consequential advances promised by AI, from curing diseases and inventing new technologies to formulating new scientific theories, are fundamentally creative acts.

date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-11-09 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. It is not the later feed date of 2026-11-10.

[Submitted on 9 Nov 2026]

support — pass: Each claim matches a verbatim abstract excerpt. The draft states the benefit conditionally ("If it works as intended"). It correctly notes that the supplied page gives no evaluation results. No outcomes or stakeholder impacts are invented.

reinforcing the process that yields creative responses without reinforcing any specific response

media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct access to the source.