Görkem, Orhun, Vasilopoulos, Athanasios, Pagonis, Georgios, Clerico, Victoria, Benmeziane, Hadjer, Boybat, Irem, Tsai, Hsinyu, Sebastian, Abu, Simon, William Andrew · Nov 5, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: CAMP maps LLMs onto 3D-IMC arrays
Markdown · JSON · Original source
The authors of CAMP argue that where weights are placed in 3D-IMC arrays can limit how many matrix-vector multiplications (MVMs) run concurrently, leaving compute resources underused. Their software-based mapping algorithm accounts for the architecture, targeted network and runtime context in a conflict matrix, then uses profiling-driven feedback to refine the mapping. The proposed approach requires no hardware changes. The authors report that it raises compute utilization from 42.4% to 60.3%, with up to 2.0x higher 3D-IMC throughput and 1.74x higher end-to-end throughput than state-of-the-art mapping algorithms. These are results reported in the paper’s abstract; they do not by themselves establish how the gains vary across deployment settings. The abstract frames weight placement as a way to address resource contention, but does not detail the evaluation conditions behind the reported gains.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T02:32:01.630Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:12:36.796Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T02:31:18.762Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the page's abstract; it does not provide the evaluation conditions or results by architecture, network, or runtime context. The reported gains therefore cannot be assessed across those settings from this evidence alone.
Open question
Across which architectures, networks and runtime contexts does CAMP achieve the reported throughput gains?
Source-stated
The paper's authors say 3D-IMC weight placement affects which matrix-vector multiplications can run concurrently, and that this concurrency issue is underexplored.
how weights are placed in memory determines which matrix-vector multiplications (MVMs) can execute concurrently
Source-stated
CAMP is an inference-context-aware weight mapping algorithm for 3D-IMC-based LLM accelerators.
we propose CAMP (Context-Aware Mapping and Placement), an inference-context-aware weight mapping algorithm for 3D-IMC-based LLM accelerators.
Source-stated
CAMP represents potential resource contention in a conflict matrix and refines its mapping through profiling-driven feedback.
CAMP captures the potential resource contention resulting from the architecture, targeted network, and runtime context in a conflict matrix
Source-stated
The authors report that CAMP increases 3D-IMC compute utilization from 42.4% to 60.3%.
improving 3D-IMC compute utilization from 42.4% to 60.3%
Source-stated
The authors report up to 2.0x higher 3D-IMC throughput and 1.74x higher end-to-end throughput than state-of-the-art mapping algorithms.
delivering up to 2.0x higher 3D-IMC throughput and 1.74x higher end-to-end throughput over state-of-the-art mapping algorithms.
Source-stated
The authors describe CAMP as an offline, software-based solution that requires no hardware changes.
CAMP is an offline, software-based solution requiring no hardware changes
Source and contributor context
Görkem, Orhun, Vasilopoulos, Athanasios, Pagonis, Georgios, Clerico, Victoria, Benmeziane, Hadjer, Boybat, Irem, Tsai, Hsinyu, Sebastian, Abu, Simon, William Andrew · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 6686cc2e-df7a-4a0b-8679-d9ae96f54907.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T02:32:01.630Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: e8abb5598db516c5f5711e087894467d4651918ed7c3720aedf61771d084eae4. Source text hash: 2916a52e81d1faeda1f5b7c617b0c0c24a909d89e3fcfab8e8d3bdd4b9ade67d.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-09T02:32:01.630Z
arXiv cs.AI: CAMP maps LLMs onto 3D-IMC arrays
The authors of CAMP argue that where weights are placed in 3D-IMC arrays can limit how many matrix-vector multiplications (MVMs) run concurrently, leaving compute resources underused. Their software-based mapping algorithm accounts for the architecture, targeted network and runtime context in a conflict matrix, then uses profiling-driven feedback to refine the mapping. The proposed approach requires no hardware changes. The authors report that it raises compute utilization from 42.4% to 60.3%, with up to 2.0x higher 3D-IMC throughput and 1.74x higher end-to-end throughput than state-of-the-art mapping algorithms. These are results reported in the paper’s abstract; they do not by themselves establish how the gains vary across deployment settings. The abstract frames weight placement as a way to address resource contention, but does not detail the evaluation conditions behind the reported gains.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T02:32:01.630Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:12:36.796Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T02:31:18.762Z.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the page's abstract; it does not provide the evaluation conditions or results by architecture, network, or runtime context. The reported gains therefore cannot be assessed across those settings from this evidence alone.
Open question
Across which architectures, networks and runtime contexts does CAMP achieve the reported throughput gains?
Source-stated
The paper's authors say 3D-IMC weight placement affects which matrix-vector multiplications can run concurrently, and that this concurrency issue is underexplored.
how weights are placed in memory determines which matrix-vector multiplications (MVMs) can execute concurrently
Source-stated
CAMP is an inference-context-aware weight mapping algorithm for 3D-IMC-based LLM accelerators.
we propose CAMP (Context-Aware Mapping and Placement), an inference-context-aware weight mapping algorithm for 3D-IMC-based LLM accelerators.
Source-stated
CAMP represents potential resource contention in a conflict matrix and refines its mapping through profiling-driven feedback.
CAMP captures the potential resource contention resulting from the architecture, targeted network, and runtime context in a conflict matrix
Source-stated
The authors report that CAMP increases 3D-IMC compute utilization from 42.4% to 60.3%.
improving 3D-IMC compute utilization from 42.4% to 60.3%
Source-stated
The authors report up to 2.0x higher 3D-IMC throughput and 1.74x higher end-to-end throughput than state-of-the-art mapping algorithms.
delivering up to 2.0x higher 3D-IMC throughput and 1.74x higher end-to-end throughput over state-of-the-art mapping algorithms.
Source-stated
The authors describe CAMP as an offline, software-based solution that requires no hardware changes.
CAMP is an offline, software-based solution requiring no hardware changes
Source and contributor context
Görkem, Orhun, Vasilopoulos, Athanasios, Pagonis, Georgios, Clerico, Victoria, Benmeziane, Hadjer, Boybat, Irem, Tsai, Hsinyu, Sebastian, Abu, Simon, William Andrew · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 6686cc2e-df7a-4a0b-8679-d9ae96f54907.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T02:32:01.630Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: e8abb5598db516c5f5711e087894467d4651918ed7c3720aedf61771d084eae4. Source text hash: 2916a52e81d1faeda1f5b7c617b0c0c24a909d89e3fcfab8e8d3bdd4b9ade67d.
uncertain · 2026-11-09T02:32:01.630Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 6686cc2e-df7a-4a0b-8679-d9ae96f54907
attribution — pass: The claims are attributed to the paper's authors as reported results. Labeling the source as arXiv cs.AI fits the cross-listing, although the primary category is cs.AR.
Hardware Architecture (cs.AR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
summary — uncertain: The draft is accurate but hard for non-specialists to follow. It never explains 3D-IMC (analog in-memory computing, which runs calculations directly on weights stored in memory, with memory arrays stacked in vertical tiers). It also omits the motivating problem: LLMs incur heavy memory-access costs, and in-memory computing aims to cut energy and latency. Without that context, readers cannot see why weight placement matters. Smallest repair: add one sentence explaining IMC and 3D stacking and one sentence on the memory-access motivation. Terms such as weights, MVMs and throughput also need tooltips.
Analog In-Memory Computing (AIMC) is an emerging solution that enables computation directly on static weights stored in memory, substantially reducing energy and latency.
date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-11-05 matches the v1 submission date shown on the arXiv page.
[Submitted on 5 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Every claim matches the abstract, including the utilization figures, the 'up to' qualifier on throughput, the offline and software-only design, the conflict matrix and the profiling feedback loop. The caveats and the question correctly note that the abstract does not give evaluation conditions, and they do not invent benefits.
CAMP is an offline, software-based solution requiring no hardware changes and improving 3D-IMC compute utilization from 42.4% to 60.3%
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page, which is the original source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv