Chen, Zhiyang, Yao, Hailong · Nov 7, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: Chen and Yao present an improved algorithm for quantified Boolean formulas
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Zhiyang Chen and Hailong Yao report a new algorithm for quantified Boolean formula (QBF), the quantified version of Boolean satisfiability (SAT), a fundamental problem in constraint solving. They say it uses memoized search and solves QBF with n variables and m clauses in 1.685^m·poly(n) and space. The authors describe this as the first improvement in over 20 years on the 1.709^m·poly(n) bound by Williams. Their technique uses minimum vertex cover of conflict graphs, an idea previously proposed for studying the parameterized complexity of SAT, and extends it to QBF. They also state that QBF is slicewise polynomial-time solvable using this parameter. Escape Meridian interpretation: this is a theoretical improvement in the stated bound for solving QBF; the abstract does not report empirical performance or describe the algorithm’s practical use. The claims concern a problem the authors characterize as PSPACE-complete, so the improvement is in the algorithmic bound they give, not a claim that the problem has become easy in practice.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 7, 2026 (2026-11-07).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T15:17:20.656Z. First observed: 2026-11-10T08:39:44.365Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T15:16:34.893Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The evidence is the abstract, not the full paper; it does not provide the proof or details needed to assess the stated bounds. The abstract does not report empirical performance or describe practical applications.
Open question
How does the algorithm perform on QBF instances in practice, beyond the stated theoretical and space bound?
Source-stated
Chen and Yao present a memoized-search algorithm for QBF with n variables and m clauses, with a stated running-time and space bound of 1.685^m·poly(n).
we present a new algorithm based on memoized search, which solves QBF with $n$ variables and $m$ clauses in $1.685^m\cdot\text{poly}(n)$ time and space.
Source-stated
The authors say this is the first improvement in over 20 years on the 1.709^m·poly(n) bound by Williams.
This is the first improvement over the $1.709^m\cdot\text{poly}(n)$ bound by Williams in over 20 years.
Source-stated
The technique extends minimum vertex cover of conflict graphs, previously proposed for studying the parameterized complexity of SAT, to QBF; the authors also state that QBF is slicewise polynomial-time solvable using this parameter.
Our technique is based on the minimum vertex cover of the conflict graphs, which was proposed to study the parameterized complexity of SAT. We extend this idea to QBF and further show that QBF is slicewise polynomial-time solvable using this parameter.
Escape Meridian interpretation
The abstract presents a theoretical algorithmic bound and does not report empirical performance or practical use.
we present a new algorithm based on memoized search, which solves QBF with $n$ variables and $m$ clauses in $1.685^m\cdot\text{poly}(n)$ time and space.
Source and contributor context
Chen, Zhiyang, Yao, Hailong · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
TIME
TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: b1adc809-e656-4ca7-86ec-c6cd9eee8a22.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T15:17:20.656Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: a492e00d76ccd33e8cabd65fd0fe694493a16abb0b41dc176b8c16bf1346f19f. Source text hash: 9a549fc1dcf0b718e7b50ab89ab803623529837d46024dccfaffd611e7b535dc.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-10T15:17:20.656Z
arXiv cs.AI: Chen and Yao present an improved algorithm for quantified Boolean formulas
Zhiyang Chen and Hailong Yao report a new algorithm for quantified Boolean formula (QBF), the quantified version of Boolean satisfiability (SAT), a fundamental problem in constraint solving. They say it uses memoized search and solves QBF with n variables and m clauses in 1.685^m·poly(n) and space. The authors describe this as the first improvement in over 20 years on the 1.709^m·poly(n) bound by Williams. Their technique uses minimum vertex cover of conflict graphs, an idea previously proposed for studying the parameterized complexity of SAT, and extends it to QBF. They also state that QBF is slicewise polynomial-time solvable using this parameter. Escape Meridian interpretation: this is a theoretical improvement in the stated bound for solving QBF; the abstract does not report empirical performance or describe the algorithm’s practical use. The claims concern a problem the authors characterize as PSPACE-complete, so the improvement is in the algorithmic bound they give, not a claim that the problem has become easy in practice.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 7, 2026 (2026-11-07).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T15:17:20.656Z. First observed: 2026-11-10T08:39:44.365Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T15:16:34.893Z.
Limits
The evidence is the abstract, not the full paper; it does not provide the proof or details needed to assess the stated bounds. The abstract does not report empirical performance or describe practical applications.
Open question
How does the algorithm perform on QBF instances in practice, beyond the stated theoretical and space bound?
Source-stated
Chen and Yao present a memoized-search algorithm for QBF with n variables and m clauses, with a stated running-time and space bound of 1.685^m·poly(n).
we present a new algorithm based on memoized search, which solves QBF with $n$ variables and $m$ clauses in $1.685^m\cdot\text{poly}(n)$ time and space.
Source-stated
The authors say this is the first improvement in over 20 years on the 1.709^m·poly(n) bound by Williams.
This is the first improvement over the $1.709^m\cdot\text{poly}(n)$ bound by Williams in over 20 years.
Source-stated
The technique extends minimum vertex cover of conflict graphs, previously proposed for studying the parameterized complexity of SAT, to QBF; the authors also state that QBF is slicewise polynomial-time solvable using this parameter.
Our technique is based on the minimum vertex cover of the conflict graphs, which was proposed to study the parameterized complexity of SAT. We extend this idea to QBF and further show that QBF is slicewise polynomial-time solvable using this parameter.
Escape Meridian interpretation
The abstract presents a theoretical algorithmic bound and does not report empirical performance or practical use.
we present a new algorithm based on memoized search, which solves QBF with $n$ variables and $m$ clauses in $1.685^m\cdot\text{poly}(n)$ time and space.
Source and contributor context
Chen, Zhiyang, Yao, Hailong · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
TIME
TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: b1adc809-e656-4ca7-86ec-c6cd9eee8a22.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T15:17:20.656Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: a492e00d76ccd33e8cabd65fd0fe694493a16abb0b41dc176b8c16bf1346f19f. Source text hash: 9a549fc1dcf0b718e7b50ab89ab803623529837d46024dccfaffd611e7b535dc.
uncertain · 2026-11-10T15:17:20.656Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: b1adc809-e656-4ca7-86ec-c6cd9eee8a22
attribution — pass: The reading correctly credits Zhiyang Chen and Hailong Yao and keeps the bound, the 20-year improvement and the slicewise result as the authors' stated claims. The label 'arXiv cs.AI' matches the feed publisher. The paper's primary category is cs.DS and cs.AI is a cross-list, but this does not misattribute the work.
Authors:Zhiyang Chen, Hailong Yao
summary — uncertain: The reading is faithful but hard for a reader without specialist background to follow. Central terms are left unexplained: memoized search, PSPACE-complete, minimum vertex cover, conflict graphs, parameterized complexity, slicewise polynomial-time and the bound 1.685^m·poly(n). Nor does it say in plain words what a QBF or SAT problem asks. Smallest repair: briefly gloss QBF/SAT and note that lowering the exponential base from 1.709 to 1.685 shrinks the worst-case growth rate as clauses increase. Tooltips could cover the remaining terms. The question is reasonable.
Quantified Boolean formula (QBF), the quantified version of Boolean satisfiability (SAT), is a fundamental problem in constraint solving.
date — pass: The originalPublished value of 2026-11-07 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The feed date of 2026-11-10 is correctly not used.
[Submitted on 7 Nov 2026]
support — pass: All source-stated claims match the abstract verbatim in substance. The labeled interpretation, that the abstract gives a theoretical bound without empirical results or practical use, is accurate for the abstract. It is appropriately hedged and does not turn the bound into a claim of practical reliability. The draft invents no benefits or costs.
This is the first improvement over the $1.709^m\cdot\text{poly}(n)$ bound by Williams in over 20 years.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct access to the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Explore TIMEarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivTIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Explore TIMETIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Explore TIMEarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivTIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Explore TIME