Li, Jichao, Lu, Jinrong, Yu, Manjiang, Liu, Zhixuan · Nov 5, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: DelegateEval proposes a framework to evaluate personal external service agents
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Jichao Li and coauthors propose DelegateEval, a framework for evaluating platforms that let an agent authorized and continuously managed by an individual take on external client work. The framework considers whether platforms enable people to turn their expertise into ongoing services. Its eight dimensions include delivery quality, expertise inheritance, service continuity, reliability and governance, and efficiency and value. The authors also include ease of creation and service discovery and matching. They say such agents could help individuals serve more clients with less direct involvement and generate economic value at scale. That is a possibility the paper proposes, not a demonstrated outcome: the authors present a framework and experimental design, while complete datasets, executable environments, a unified scoring protocol, and cross-model results remain to be developed and empirically validated.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T02:38:25.944Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:46.972Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T02:33:50.812Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The source presents an evaluation framework and experimental design; the abstract says the complete datasets, executable environments, unified scoring protocol, and cross-model results remain to be developed and empirically validated. The evidence is the abstract and does not provide details of the proposed experimental design.
Open question
How will DelegateEval’s eight dimensions be measured in a unified scoring protocol, and what will cross-model results show?
Source-stated
The authors define a personal external service agent as an agent authorized and continuously managed by an individual to handle client requests, deliver work, and provide ongoing support using that person’s expertise and boundaries.
an agent authorized and continuously managed by a specific individual to accept client requests, deliver work, and provide ongoing support
Source-stated
DelegateEval is a proposed platform-level framework covering eight dimensions, including delivery quality, expertise inheritance, service continuity, and reliability and governance.
It covers eight dimensions: ease of creation, service discovery and matching, delivery quality, expertise inheritance, service continuity, learning and improvement, reliability and governance, and efficiency and value.
Source-stated
The authors suggest these agents could help individuals serve more clients with less direct involvement and generate economic value at scale.
Such agents could allow individuals to serve more clients with less direct involvement and generate economic value at scale.
Source-stated
The framework’s datasets, executable environments, unified scoring protocol, and cross-model results remain to be developed and empirically validated.
Complete datasets, executable environments, a unified scoring protocol, and cross-model results remain to be developed and empirically validated.
Source and contributor context
Li, Jichao, Lu, Jinrong, Yu, Manjiang, Liu, Zhixuan · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: afb76a52-9049-4903-89c5-5a934fffbed2.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T02:38:25.944Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: useful_perspective.
Observation: 1369a3fd7cf0d133b08ccf10b0336b8c296c2df8e3394d1f72d64a0a5bf15bc2. Source text hash: 0654b4e587f1f45a1857761febc920d290710e6ed85c44929fdeada25cbd6275.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-09T02:38:25.944Z
arXiv cs.AI: DelegateEval proposes a framework to evaluate personal external service agents
Jichao Li and coauthors propose DelegateEval, a framework for evaluating platforms that let an agent authorized and continuously managed by an individual take on external client work. The framework considers whether platforms enable people to turn their expertise into ongoing services. Its eight dimensions include delivery quality, expertise inheritance, service continuity, reliability and governance, and efficiency and value. The authors also include ease of creation and service discovery and matching. They say such agents could help individuals serve more clients with less direct involvement and generate economic value at scale. That is a possibility the paper proposes, not a demonstrated outcome: the authors present a framework and experimental design, while complete datasets, executable environments, a unified scoring protocol, and cross-model results remain to be developed and empirically validated.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T02:38:25.944Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:46.972Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T02:33:50.812Z.
Limits
The source presents an evaluation framework and experimental design; the abstract says the complete datasets, executable environments, unified scoring protocol, and cross-model results remain to be developed and empirically validated. The evidence is the abstract and does not provide details of the proposed experimental design.
Open question
How will DelegateEval’s eight dimensions be measured in a unified scoring protocol, and what will cross-model results show?
Source-stated
The authors define a personal external service agent as an agent authorized and continuously managed by an individual to handle client requests, deliver work, and provide ongoing support using that person’s expertise and boundaries.
an agent authorized and continuously managed by a specific individual to accept client requests, deliver work, and provide ongoing support
Source-stated
DelegateEval is a proposed platform-level framework covering eight dimensions, including delivery quality, expertise inheritance, service continuity, and reliability and governance.
It covers eight dimensions: ease of creation, service discovery and matching, delivery quality, expertise inheritance, service continuity, learning and improvement, reliability and governance, and efficiency and value.
Source-stated
The authors suggest these agents could help individuals serve more clients with less direct involvement and generate economic value at scale.
Such agents could allow individuals to serve more clients with less direct involvement and generate economic value at scale.
Source-stated
The framework’s datasets, executable environments, unified scoring protocol, and cross-model results remain to be developed and empirically validated.
Complete datasets, executable environments, a unified scoring protocol, and cross-model results remain to be developed and empirically validated.
Source and contributor context
Li, Jichao, Lu, Jinrong, Yu, Manjiang, Liu, Zhixuan · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: afb76a52-9049-4903-89c5-5a934fffbed2.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T02:38:25.944Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: useful_perspective.
Observation: 1369a3fd7cf0d133b08ccf10b0336b8c296c2df8e3394d1f72d64a0a5bf15bc2. Source text hash: 0654b4e587f1f45a1857761febc920d290710e6ed85c44929fdeada25cbd6275.
passed · 2026-11-09T02:38:25.944Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: afb76a52-9049-4903-89c5-5a934fffbed2
attribution — pass: The reading correctly attributes the framework, definition and economic-value suggestion to the listed authors, Jichao Li and coauthors, on arXiv cs.AI. It keeps the scaling claim as the authors' possibility, not an established fact.
Authors:Jichao Li, Jinrong Lu, Manjiang Yu, Zhixuan Liu
summary — pass: The summary leads with the actor and the proposal, defines a personal external service agent in plain terms, and lists seven of the eight dimensions. The omitted dimension is learning and improvement, and the wording 'include' keeps the list accurate. It keeps the paper's framework-only status clear. The question follows directly from the unbuilt scoring protocol and missing cross-model results. Terms such as expertise inheritance are left unexplained but do not block understanding.
These dimensions assess whether a platform enables people with different backgrounds to turn their expertise into ongoing services that deliver verifiable work
date — pass: The original publication date of 2026-11-05 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The feed date of Nov 6 is a later announcement and is correctly not used.
[Submitted on 5 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Each claim matches the abstract verbatim or closely. The economic benefit is framed explicitly as a possibility, not a demonstrated outcome. The limitations accurately note that datasets, environments, scoring and results are still to be developed and validated. The reading invents no stakeholders or outcomes.
We present the framework and an experimental design. Complete datasets, executable environments, a unified scoring protocol, and cross-model results remain to be developed and empirically validated.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct access to the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv