Basit, Abdul, Shafique, Muhammad · Nov 5, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: Energy-Aware Open-Vocabulary Detection Scheduling for Low-Power Robotic Autonomy
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Authors Abdul Basit and Muhammad Shafique present an energy-aware scheduler for open-vocabulary object detection (OVD), which lets robots search for run- object queries. They argue that fixed-rate inference can spend embedded compute on low-value frames during idle motion, map revisits or stable viewpoints. Their scheduler uses odometry, map change and detector confidence to switch among low-, mid- and high-power YOLO-World-S modes on a Jetson Orin Nano. In real navigation trials with an AgileX LIMO, two target objects and four perception policies, it recorded 8/10 mission success, compared with 7/10 for each fixed-rate baseline. Against an 8 Hz high-rate baseline, mean Jetson input power fell by 5.2% and achieved OVD call rate by 34.0%. But the scheduler did not minimize mission-window Jetson input energy: longer missions can erase instantaneous power savings. In a separate stationary microbenchmark, it reduced mean power and energy relative to that baseline. The authors present robot-state-aware scheduling as a promising power-management mechanism with competitive task reliability, while cautioning that mission-window energy must be considered alongside task progress and runtime.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T22:32:46.472Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:37.830Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T22:31:57.573Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The navigation evaluation covered 40 real trials, two target objects, five placements per target-policy pair, and four perception policies. The authors state that the scheduler did not minimize mission-window Jetson input energy; longer missions can erase instantaneous power savings. The 60 s stationary microbenchmark isolates the perception workload and is separate from the navigation trials.
Open question
How do task progress and runtime affect mission-window Jetson input energy when using the scheduler?
Source-stated
The scheduler uses robot-state information and detector confidence to switch among power modes for open-vocabulary object detection.
The scheduler uses odometry, map change, and detector confidence to switch among low-, mid-, and high-power YOLO-World-S modes
Source-stated
Across the reported navigation trials, the scheduler achieved 8/10 mission success, while each fixed-rate baseline achieved 7/10.
Across bottle and cup trials, the scheduler records 8/10 mission success compared with 7/10 for each fixed-rate baseline
Source-stated
Against the 8 Hz high-rate baseline, the scheduler reduced mean Jetson input power by 5.2% and achieved OVD call rate by 34.0%.
reducing mean Jetson input power (a Jetson-side power-draw metric) by 5.2% relative to an 8 Hz high-rate baseline and lowering achieved OVD call rate by 34.0%.
Source-stated
The authors report that longer missions can erase instantaneous power savings, so the scheduler did not minimize mission-window Jetson input energy.
It does not minimize mission-window Jetson input energy because longer missions can erase instantaneous power savings.
Source-stated
In a separate stationary microbenchmark, the scheduler reduced mean power and energy relative to the 8 Hz baseline.
the scheduler lowers mean power from 8.045 W to 7.301 W and energy from 484.7 J to 438.1 J relative to the 8 Hz baseline.
Source and contributor context
Basit, Abdul, Shafique, Muhammad · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
TIME
TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 75a2b834-04e0-4eeb-80e7-1ef8e443c88f.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T22:32:46.472Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 09bfae2188c863a170e5379b903c48acd1d30ca2ab985998977be12f92281273. Source text hash: 2b5adbc84986a5669f60ad106ded7e7be3f5e7824823700f6133d687dbd30603.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-08T22:32:46.472Z
arXiv cs.AI: Energy-Aware Open-Vocabulary Detection Scheduling for Low-Power Robotic Autonomy
Authors Abdul Basit and Muhammad Shafique present an energy-aware scheduler for open-vocabulary object detection (OVD), which lets robots search for run- object queries. They argue that fixed-rate inference can spend embedded compute on low-value frames during idle motion, map revisits or stable viewpoints. Their scheduler uses odometry, map change and detector confidence to switch among low-, mid- and high-power YOLO-World-S modes on a Jetson Orin Nano. In real navigation trials with an AgileX LIMO, two target objects and four perception policies, it recorded 8/10 mission success, compared with 7/10 for each fixed-rate baseline. Against an 8 Hz high-rate baseline, mean Jetson input power fell by 5.2% and achieved OVD call rate by 34.0%. But the scheduler did not minimize mission-window Jetson input energy: longer missions can erase instantaneous power savings. In a separate stationary microbenchmark, it reduced mean power and energy relative to that baseline. The authors present robot-state-aware scheduling as a promising power-management mechanism with competitive task reliability, while cautioning that mission-window energy must be considered alongside task progress and runtime.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T22:32:46.472Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:37.830Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T22:31:57.573Z.
Limits
The navigation evaluation covered 40 real trials, two target objects, five placements per target-policy pair, and four perception policies. The authors state that the scheduler did not minimize mission-window Jetson input energy; longer missions can erase instantaneous power savings. The 60 s stationary microbenchmark isolates the perception workload and is separate from the navigation trials.
Open question
How do task progress and runtime affect mission-window Jetson input energy when using the scheduler?
Source-stated
The scheduler uses robot-state information and detector confidence to switch among power modes for open-vocabulary object detection.
The scheduler uses odometry, map change, and detector confidence to switch among low-, mid-, and high-power YOLO-World-S modes
Source-stated
Across the reported navigation trials, the scheduler achieved 8/10 mission success, while each fixed-rate baseline achieved 7/10.
Across bottle and cup trials, the scheduler records 8/10 mission success compared with 7/10 for each fixed-rate baseline
Source-stated
Against the 8 Hz high-rate baseline, the scheduler reduced mean Jetson input power by 5.2% and achieved OVD call rate by 34.0%.
reducing mean Jetson input power (a Jetson-side power-draw metric) by 5.2% relative to an 8 Hz high-rate baseline and lowering achieved OVD call rate by 34.0%.
Source-stated
The authors report that longer missions can erase instantaneous power savings, so the scheduler did not minimize mission-window Jetson input energy.
It does not minimize mission-window Jetson input energy because longer missions can erase instantaneous power savings.
Source-stated
In a separate stationary microbenchmark, the scheduler reduced mean power and energy relative to the 8 Hz baseline.
the scheduler lowers mean power from 8.045 W to 7.301 W and energy from 484.7 J to 438.1 J relative to the 8 Hz baseline.
Source and contributor context
Basit, Abdul, Shafique, Muhammad · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
TIME
TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 75a2b834-04e0-4eeb-80e7-1ef8e443c88f.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T22:32:46.472Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 09bfae2188c863a170e5379b903c48acd1d30ca2ab985998977be12f92281273. Source text hash: 2b5adbc84986a5669f60ad106ded7e7be3f5e7824823700f6133d687dbd30603.
uncertain · 2026-11-08T22:32:46.472Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 75a2b834-04e0-4eeb-80e7-1ef8e443c88f
attribution — pass: The reading correctly credits the paper to Abdul Basit and Muhammad Shafique. It keeps findings framed as the authors' reported results and argument, for example 'They argue' and 'The authors present'.
Authors:Abdul Basit, Muhammad Shafique
summary — uncertain: The reading is faithful and keeps the authors' caveat, but its central tension is hard to follow without background. It never says the Jetson Orin Nano is the robot's onboard computer. It also does not plainly explain why lower instantaneous power can still fail to lower total mission energy: total energy depends on how long the mission runs. Odometry and YOLO-World-S are central and unexplained, and no term-library tooltips are indicated. Smallest repair: add tooltips or brief glosses for Jetson Orin Nano, odometry and mission-window energy (power over time). Optionally note that the 8/10 vs 7/10 difference is one trial out of ten.
It does not minimize mission-window Jetson input energy because longer missions can erase instantaneous power savings.
date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-11-05. This matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The 2026-11-06 feed date is correctly not used.
[Submitted on 5 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Every claim and limitation matches the abstract: the mode switching, 8/10 vs 7/10 mission success, the 5.2% power and 34.0% call-rate reductions, the energy caveat, and the separate stationary microbenchmark. The reading invents no benefits, costs or forecasts. 'Promising' and 'competitive task reliability' are the authors' own framing.
These results support robot-state-aware OVD scheduling as a promising power-management mechanism with competitive task reliability
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct way to reach the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Explore TIMEarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivTIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Explore TIMEarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv