Sung-Bin, Kim, Chang, Joohyun, Harwath, David, Oh, Tae-Hyun · Dec 16, 2025
arXiv cs.AI: FacEDiT—Talking Head Video Editing via Facial Motion Infilling
Markdown · JSON · Original source
The authors of FacEDiT argue that editing a segment of a talking-head video is challenging: a replacement must fit the speech while preserving the person, untouched footage, and continuity at the boundaries. They frame editing as facial motion infilling, recovering masked facial motion from speech and surrounding motion. This approach lets them simulate local edits during training with ordinary video–speech pairs, rather than requiring paired recordings of the same person and scene that differ only in a local spoken segment. The authors introduce FacEDiT, a mask-controlled model with a local temporal attention bias and temporal smoothness regularization. They report that experiments produce accurate, speech-aligned edits with strong identity preservation and seamless boundary transitions. They also introduce FacEDiTBench, which covers different edit types and lengths, and say the same model can perform portrait animation and lip synchronization by changing the mask pattern. The abstract reports these results but gives no scores or experiment details, so their magnitude and scope cannot be assessed from this evidence alone.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Dec 16, 2025 (2025-12-16).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T01:24:18.980Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:49.672Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T01:23:29.743Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The evidence is the abstract, which reports experimental results but provides no scores or experiment details for assessing their magnitude or scope.
Open question
How does FacEDiT perform across the different edit types and lengths in FacEDiTBench?
Source-stated
The authors say local talking-head video edits must synthesize a replacement while preserving identity, unedited regions, and continuity at segment boundaries.
This involves variable-duration local rewriting while preserving identity, unedited regions, and boundary continuity
Source-stated
The authors formulate editing as facial motion infilling, recovering masked motion from speech and surrounding motion context using ordinary video–speech pairs.
a self-supervised pretext task that recovers masked facial motion from speech and surrounding motion context using ordinary video--speech pairs.
Source-stated
The authors introduce FacEDiT, using a mask-controlled model, a local temporal attention bias, and temporal smoothness regularization.
a mask-controlled talking head model with a local temporal attention bias and temporal smoothness regularization
Source-stated
The authors report accurate, speech-aligned edits, identity preservation, and seamless boundary transitions in their experiments.
FacEDiT produces accurate, speech-aligned edits with strong identity preservation and seamless boundary transitions.
Source-stated
The authors introduce FacEDiTBench for talking-head video editing, covering diverse edit types and lengths with dedicated evaluation metrics.
the first benchmark for talking head video editing, covering diverse edit types and lengths with dedicated evaluation metrics.
Source-stated
The authors say changing the mask pattern allows the same model to perform portrait animation and lip synchronization.
the same facial motion infilling model extends to portrait animation and lip synchronization by simply changing the mask pattern
Source and contributor context
Sung-Bin, Kim, Chang, Joohyun, Harwath, David, Oh, Tae-Hyun · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: cd4ddfdb-ccb8-43de-83b2-eee4d26b497e.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T01:24:18.980Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 160f1aa9b2342250a558285b937b81582a71843c27e7928306e40006b83922f5. Source text hash: 22fa424d2034268eb113d2e9e68d13f3e6d59cfec1d8568f714b2e6890c941c5.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-09T01:24:18.980Z
arXiv cs.AI: FacEDiT—Talking Head Video Editing via Facial Motion Infilling
The authors of FacEDiT argue that editing a segment of a talking-head video is challenging: a replacement must fit the speech while preserving the person, untouched footage, and continuity at the boundaries. They frame editing as facial motion infilling, recovering masked facial motion from speech and surrounding motion. This approach lets them simulate local edits during training with ordinary video–speech pairs, rather than requiring paired recordings of the same person and scene that differ only in a local spoken segment. The authors introduce FacEDiT, a mask-controlled model with a local temporal attention bias and temporal smoothness regularization. They report that experiments produce accurate, speech-aligned edits with strong identity preservation and seamless boundary transitions. They also introduce FacEDiTBench, which covers different edit types and lengths, and say the same model can perform portrait animation and lip synchronization by changing the mask pattern. The abstract reports these results but gives no scores or experiment details, so their magnitude and scope cannot be assessed from this evidence alone.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Dec 16, 2025 (2025-12-16).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T01:24:18.980Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:49.672Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T01:23:29.743Z.
Limits
The evidence is the abstract, which reports experimental results but provides no scores or experiment details for assessing their magnitude or scope.
Open question
How does FacEDiT perform across the different edit types and lengths in FacEDiTBench?
Source-stated
The authors say local talking-head video edits must synthesize a replacement while preserving identity, unedited regions, and continuity at segment boundaries.
This involves variable-duration local rewriting while preserving identity, unedited regions, and boundary continuity
Source-stated
The authors formulate editing as facial motion infilling, recovering masked motion from speech and surrounding motion context using ordinary video–speech pairs.
a self-supervised pretext task that recovers masked facial motion from speech and surrounding motion context using ordinary video--speech pairs.
Source-stated
The authors introduce FacEDiT, using a mask-controlled model, a local temporal attention bias, and temporal smoothness regularization.
a mask-controlled talking head model with a local temporal attention bias and temporal smoothness regularization
Source-stated
The authors report accurate, speech-aligned edits, identity preservation, and seamless boundary transitions in their experiments.
FacEDiT produces accurate, speech-aligned edits with strong identity preservation and seamless boundary transitions.
Source-stated
The authors introduce FacEDiTBench for talking-head video editing, covering diverse edit types and lengths with dedicated evaluation metrics.
the first benchmark for talking head video editing, covering diverse edit types and lengths with dedicated evaluation metrics.
Source-stated
The authors say changing the mask pattern allows the same model to perform portrait animation and lip synchronization.
the same facial motion infilling model extends to portrait animation and lip synchronization by simply changing the mask pattern
Source and contributor context
Sung-Bin, Kim, Chang, Joohyun, Harwath, David, Oh, Tae-Hyun · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: cd4ddfdb-ccb8-43de-83b2-eee4d26b497e.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T01:24:18.980Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 160f1aa9b2342250a558285b937b81582a71843c27e7928306e40006b83922f5. Source text hash: 22fa424d2034268eb113d2e9e68d13f3e6d59cfec1d8568f714b2e6890c941c5.
uncertain · 2026-11-09T01:24:18.980Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: cd4ddfdb-ccb8-43de-83b2-eee4d26b497e
attribution — pass: The draft attributes the problem framing, method, benchmark and results to the paper's authors. It does not present them as established fact. The arXiv cs.AI label matches the publisher metadata, and the paper is cross-listed in cs.AI.
Authors:Kim Sung-Bin, Joohyun Chang, David Harwath, Tae-Hyun Oh
summary — uncertain: The draft is faithful, but it leaves out the source's stated practical stake: editing a segment without reshooting the scene. That is the clearest reason a non-specialist would care. Central terms are also not explained in plain language, including talking-head video (a video of a person speaking to camera), masked motion and mask pattern. Smallest repair: add 'without reshooting the scene' and a brief plain gloss of talking-head video and masking. The 'first benchmark' framing is also omitted, though that is minor.
Editing a local segment of a talking head video without reshooting the scene remains challenging and underexplored.
date — pass: originalPublished is 2025-12-16, which matches the v1 submission date. It is not the 5 Nov 2026 v2 revision or the later feed date.
Submitted on 16 Dec 2025 (v1), last revised 5 Nov 2026 (this version, v2)
support — pass: Each claim matches the abstract and keeps the source's scope. Results are framed as author-reported, and the limitation correctly notes that no scores are given. The question about performance across edit types and lengths follows from the benchmark description without assuming an answer. No unsupported benefits or costs are implied.
Our key insight is that local video editing can be simulated during training by masking a motion span and reconstructing it from speech and visible motion context.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page, which is the original source itself.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition reference