arXiv cs.AI: Hindsight Relabeling is All You Need for Reach-Avoid Learning

arXiv cs.AI: Hindsight Relabeling is All You Need for Reach-Avoid Learning

Authors Kevin Li and Marinka Zitnik introduce RADT, a decision transformer approach for offline, reward-free, goal-conditioned, avoid-region-conditioned reinforcement learning. In reach-avoid tasks, an agent must reach a target while avoiding undesirable regions. The authors say existing approaches encode avoid-region information into the state space and cost function, limiting flexible specification at evaluation time, and depend on carefully designed reward and cost functions. RADT instead represents goals and avoid-regions as prompt tokens, and uses avoid-region hindsight relabeling to learn from suboptimal trajectories generated by a random policy without reward or cost supervision. The authors report tests across 17 tasks, environments, and experimental settings. They say RADT generalizes zero-shot to avoid-region sizes and counts outside its training distribution, outperforming baselines that require retraining. In one such setting, they report a 35.7% improvement in normalized cost over the best retrained baseline while maintaining high goal-reaching success. They also apply RADT to cell reprogramming in biology. The results suggest a way to change avoid-region specifications at evaluation time without retraining, although the abstract does not provide experimental details needed to assess the reported comparisons or the biology application.

Publication: 69d845aa-52e7-40c5-8be5-c1fa06f79bae

attribution — pass: The draft correctly credits the work to Kevin Li and Marinka Zitnik. It keeps the method, results and biology application framed as the authors' claims, and the arXiv publisher label matches the source page.

Authors:Kevin Li, Marinka Zitnik

summary — uncertain: The content is faithful: reach-avoid is defined, and the evaluation-time flexibility point is preserved. However, the central mechanism remains opaque to non-specialists. Hindsight relabeling (the title concept), decision transformer, offline RL, reward-free, goal-conditioned, prompt tokens, random policy, zero-shot and normalized cost are stacked without explanation. Cell reprogramming is also unexplained. Smallest repair: attach term-library tooltips for these terms, and add hindsight relabeling and normalized cost if they are missing. The technical terms themselves should stay unchanged.

using our novel avoid-region hindsight relabeling approach, without the need for reward/cost supervision

date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2025-05-25 matches the v1 submission. It is correctly preferred over the v3 revision of 3 Nov 2026 and the November 2026 feed date.

[Submitted on 25 May 2025 (v1), last revised 3 Nov 2026 (this version, v3)]

support — pass: Each claim matches the abstract: prompt-token encoding, learning without reward or cost supervision from random-policy trajectories, the 17-setting benchmark, zero-shot out-of-distribution generalization, the 35.7% normalized-cost improvement and the cell reprogramming application. The closing interpretation stays tied to the authors' evaluation-time claim, and the limitation correctly notes that only the abstract is available. The question is an unresolved issue rather than a leading claim.

RADT generalizes in a zero-shot manner to out-of-distribution avoid-region sizes and counts, outperforming baselines that require retraining.

media — pass: The selected media is the verified, direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It matches the source URL and is the easiest route to the original work.