arXiv cs.AI: KARMA: Training-Free Knowledge-Atomic Harness Evolution for Industrial Advertising Agents

arXiv cs.AI: KARMA: Training-Free Knowledge-Atomic Harness Evolution for Industrial Advertising Agents

Authors Xinhua Miao, Yuanzhen Rong, Weiru Zhang and Xiaoyi Zeng present KARMA, a framework for adapting industrial advertising agents as products, traffic patterns and operating policies change. KARMA changes decision knowledge while keeping model weights and executable harness code frozen. A deterministic Trace Verifier maps errors to candidate modules. A Critic compares successful and failed trajectories, and a tool-constrained Evolver makes atomic knowledge edits. A fixed validation gate keeps an edit only if its measured gain reaches a threshold; otherwise, the previous knowledge state is restored. The authors evaluate KARMA across 18 domain–model settings using cases sampled from operation logs across six e-commerce domains. They report that average hold-out score rises from 30.19 to 39.15, a gain of 8.96 points. They also report that removing either successful or failed trajectories more than halves the average hold-out gain, and that evolved knowledge transfers across domains without further adaptation. The authors say linking retained patches to diagnostic evidence and validation outcomes supports inspectable and reversible knowledge adaptation. The abstract does not define the hold-out score or establish how the results carry over to live advertising operations.

Publication: f57a3e69-2061-4ae6-8e81-dcb6b3caa7f6

attribution — pass: The reading correctly credits the four listed authors and the arXiv cs.AI preprint. Results are framed as what the authors report or say, not as established fact.

Authors:Xinhua Miao, Yuanzhen Rong, Weiru Zhang, Xiaoyi Zeng

summary — uncertain: The reading tracks the abstract faithfully, but central jargon is left unexplained for a general reader: model weights, executable harness code, training-free, trajectories, atomic knowledge edits and hold-out score. The core idea is never stated plainly. That idea is that the agent improves by editing its stored written knowledge rather than retraining the AI model. The title also just repeats the paper title. Smallest repair: add one plain sentence explaining that KARMA edits and tests the agent's knowledge without retraining the model, and define trajectories as recorded attempts that succeeded or failed.

a training-free framework that evolves six typed knowledge modules while keeping model weights and executable harness code frozen

date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-10-29 matches the v1 submission date on the arXiv page. The later feed date is correctly not used.

[Submitted on 29 Oct 2026]

support — pass: The source supports each claim: frozen weights and code, the 30.19 to 39.15 gain across 18 settings, the ablation finding, cross-domain transfer, and inspectable, reversible adaptation. The limitations accurately note what the abstract leaves undefined. The question about live operations follows from the evidence and is not a leading claim.

Across 18 domain--model settings, KARMA raises the average hold-out score from 30.19 to 39.15 (+8.96 points, +29.7%).

media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page. It is the most direct way to reach the source.