Cheng, Zi-Jian, Wu, Weiming, Meng, Jie, Peng, Zhen, Huang, Shan, Li, Qun, Wu, Guobing, Guo, Lan-Zhe · Nov 4, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: KDASO: Knowledge-Data Dual-Driven Automated Skill Optimization for Liability Adjudication Tasks
Markdown · JSON · Original source
The authors propose KDASO, a method for keeping executable skill libraries usable in liability adjudication tasks such as legal charge determination. They argue that existing approaches face three problems: skill libraries can become stale as scenarios change, can deviate from the intended expert logic in skill descriptions, and large skill collections can exceed context budgets, leaving out relevant skills. KDASO combines induction of skills from recent adjudication data, refinement based on analysis of LLM trajectories, and routing that accounts for context budgets. The authors report experiments in ride-hailing adjudication, legal liability determination, and logical reasoning judgment, where KDASO outperforms the general-purpose and domain-specific baselines they tested. They also report an 8.96% improvement when transferring skills to concept-similar scenarios and consistent performance gains through continuous optimization. These results are the authors’ experimental claims; the supplied abstract does not give the underlying results or explain how the reported improvement is calculated.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 4, 2026 (2026-11-04).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T16:47:53.957Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:06:58.217Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T16:47:03.839Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied abstract does not provide results, details of the baselines, or the calculation behind the reported 8.96% improvement; the strength and scope of those experimental claims cannot be assessed from this evidence alone.
Open question
How do the underlying results and the calculation of the reported 8.96% improvement support the authors’ claims?
Source-stated
The authors identify staleness, a semantic execution gap, and context-budget constraints as limitations of existing approaches.
skill libraries become stale as real-world scenarios dynamically evolve, skill descriptions often suffer from a semantic execution gap where LLMs deviate from intended expert logic, and growing skill collections exceed context budgets causing critical skill omission
Source-stated
KDASO induces skills from recent adjudication data, refines them through LLM trajectory analysis, and routes skill selection according to context budgets.
neighborhood-conditioned induction from recent adjudication data, execution-aligned refinement based on LLM trajectory analysis, and context-budgeted routing for scalable skill selection
Source-stated
The authors report that KDASO outperforms the baselines tested across three types of task.
Experiments across ride-hailing adjudication, legal liability determination, and logical reasoning judgment demonstrate that KDASO significantly outperforms current general-purpose and domain-specific baselines.
Source-stated
The authors report an 8.96% improvement when transferring skills to concept-similar scenarios, and consistent performance gains through continuous optimization.
KDASO further achieves 8.96% improvement when transferring skills to concept-similar scenarios and maintains consistent performance gains through continuous optimization
Source and contributor context
Cheng, Zi-Jian, Wu, Weiming, Meng, Jie, Peng, Zhen, Huang, Shan, Li, Qun, Wu, Guobing, Guo, Lan-Zhe · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 22d9285b-dee6-4899-8c70-c4d32e7c7a96.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T16:47:53.957Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 5f30805fcde7ee8b7d48c1c9b04d7eaea326bd89d9fee583c5ae9905bdc6de93. Source text hash: a0edcdc2db6108ffe5f6ffe8777e0a9c84bb0d68ec830b0b3c156a30b34f8fbe.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-08T16:47:53.957Z
arXiv cs.AI: KDASO: Knowledge-Data Dual-Driven Automated Skill Optimization for Liability Adjudication Tasks
The authors propose KDASO, a method for keeping executable skill libraries usable in liability adjudication tasks such as legal charge determination. They argue that existing approaches face three problems: skill libraries can become stale as scenarios change, can deviate from the intended expert logic in skill descriptions, and large skill collections can exceed context budgets, leaving out relevant skills. KDASO combines induction of skills from recent adjudication data, refinement based on analysis of LLM trajectories, and routing that accounts for context budgets. The authors report experiments in ride-hailing adjudication, legal liability determination, and logical reasoning judgment, where KDASO outperforms the general-purpose and domain-specific baselines they tested. They also report an 8.96% improvement when transferring skills to concept-similar scenarios and consistent performance gains through continuous optimization. These results are the authors’ experimental claims; the supplied abstract does not give the underlying results or explain how the reported improvement is calculated.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 4, 2026 (2026-11-04).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T16:47:53.957Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:06:58.217Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T16:47:03.839Z.
Limits
The supplied abstract does not provide results, details of the baselines, or the calculation behind the reported 8.96% improvement; the strength and scope of those experimental claims cannot be assessed from this evidence alone.
Open question
How do the underlying results and the calculation of the reported 8.96% improvement support the authors’ claims?
Source-stated
The authors identify staleness, a semantic execution gap, and context-budget constraints as limitations of existing approaches.
skill libraries become stale as real-world scenarios dynamically evolve, skill descriptions often suffer from a semantic execution gap where LLMs deviate from intended expert logic, and growing skill collections exceed context budgets causing critical skill omission
Source-stated
KDASO induces skills from recent adjudication data, refines them through LLM trajectory analysis, and routes skill selection according to context budgets.
neighborhood-conditioned induction from recent adjudication data, execution-aligned refinement based on LLM trajectory analysis, and context-budgeted routing for scalable skill selection
Source-stated
The authors report that KDASO outperforms the baselines tested across three types of task.
Experiments across ride-hailing adjudication, legal liability determination, and logical reasoning judgment demonstrate that KDASO significantly outperforms current general-purpose and domain-specific baselines.
Source-stated
The authors report an 8.96% improvement when transferring skills to concept-similar scenarios, and consistent performance gains through continuous optimization.
KDASO further achieves 8.96% improvement when transferring skills to concept-similar scenarios and maintains consistent performance gains through continuous optimization
Source and contributor context
Cheng, Zi-Jian, Wu, Weiming, Meng, Jie, Peng, Zhen, Huang, Shan, Li, Qun, Wu, Guobing, Guo, Lan-Zhe · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 22d9285b-dee6-4899-8c70-c4d32e7c7a96.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T16:47:53.957Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 5f30805fcde7ee8b7d48c1c9b04d7eaea326bd89d9fee583c5ae9905bdc6de93. Source text hash: a0edcdc2db6108ffe5f6ffe8777e0a9c84bb0d68ec830b0b3c156a30b34f8fbe.
uncertain · 2026-11-08T16:47:53.957Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 22d9285b-dee6-4899-8c70-c4d32e7c7a96
attribution — pass: The reading consistently attributes the problem framing, the method and the experimental results to the paper's authors. It labels the results as the authors' claims and does not present them as established facts.
Experiments across ride-hailing adjudication, legal liability determination, and logical reasoning judgment demonstrate that KDASO significantly outperforms current general-purpose and domain-specific baselines.
summary — uncertain: The summary is faithful, but central terms are left unexplained for a general reader: executable skills or skill libraries, context budgets, LLM trajectories, induction and routing. LLM is never expanded. A newcomer may not grasp what a skill is or why exceeding a context budget drops skills. The reading also omits the authors' interpretability framing. Smallest repair: define skill, context budget and trajectory in plain language, using tooltips or suggested term-library additions, and keep the authors' interpretable-reasoning framing.
leveraging executable skills for interpretable reasoning
date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-11-04, which matches the arXiv v1 submission date. It does not use the later feed date of November 6.
[v1] Wed, 4 Nov 2026 13:05:02 UTC (1,889 KB)
support — pass: Each claim is directly supported by the abstract. The limitation notes that the abstract gives no benchmark detail or baseline for the 8.96% figure. The question follows from that gap without asserting anything new. The reading implies no unsupported benefits or costs.
KDASO further achieves 8.96% improvement when transferring skills to concept-similar scenarios
media — pass: The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page itself. It is the direct original source and the most relevant link.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition reference