Yu, Yongcan, Guo, Kuangpu, Liang, Jian, He, Lingxiao, Wang, Meng, He, Ran · Oct 13, 2026
arXiv cs.AI lists a survey of supervised fine-tuning for reasoning large language models
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Yongcan Yu, Kuangpu Guo, Jian Liang, Lingxiao He, Meng Wang and Ran He present a survey of supervised (SFT) for reasoning . They describe SFT on long data as a foundation for eliciting and enhancing these models’ reasoning abilities, and say the fast-growing field lacks a systematic survey. The authors organize methodological work into data-centric approaches and algorithm-centric innovations, covering the SFT pipeline. They group analytical studies by data characteristics, optimization dynamics and mechanistic insights. By bringing these strands together, the survey aims to clarify current research focuses, remaining bottlenecks and possible future directions. The abstract does not detail those bottlenecks or directions; it presents the paper as a guide to a field whose methods and analysis are developing quickly.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Oct 13, 2026 (2026-10-13).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T08:10:14.086Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:42:58.992Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T05:32:19.366Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the abstract, which does not specify the survey’s examples, the remaining bottlenecks, or the future directions it identifies.
Open question
Which specific bottlenecks and future directions does the survey identify?
Source-stated
The authors describe supervised fine-tuning on long chain-of-thought data as a crucial foundation for eliciting and enhancing reasoning abilities in large reasoning models.
supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on long chain-of-thought data serves as a crucial foundation for eliciting and enhancing their reasoning abilities.
Source-stated
The authors say the field lacks a systematic survey consolidating its fast-growing literature on reasoning-oriented SFT.
the field still lacks a systematic survey that consolidates its fast-growing literature.
Source-stated
The survey organizes methodological improvements into data-centric approaches and algorithm-centric innovations, and analytical studies by data characteristics, optimization dynamics and mechanistic insights.
we review methodological improvements across the SFT pipeline and categorize them into data-centric approaches and algorithm-centric innovations.
Source-stated
The authors say they synthesize current research focuses and remaining bottlenecks and outline promising future directions.
by synthesizing current research focuses and remaining bottlenecks, we outline promising future directions for reasoning SFT.
Source and contributor context
Yu, Yongcan, Guo, Kuangpu, Liang, Jian, He, Lingxiao, Wang, Meng, He, Ran · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Fine-tuning
Further training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Chain of thought
The step-by-step working a model writes out before giving its final answer.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 3beb27b1-b9f0-4125-8fda-ea412a90353f.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T08:10:14.086Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: useful_perspective.
Observation: 29b04d4a899a433062665f4b4d2263a5742eaec7e0840106e83067f9d8fe02bb. Source text hash: 7f8fe04604a293299a5ffbc01e3d01a38ce4b4055cd65be1b75ea38a04895964.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-11T08:10:14.086Z
arXiv cs.AI lists a survey of supervised fine-tuning for reasoning large language models
Yongcan Yu, Kuangpu Guo, Jian Liang, Lingxiao He, Meng Wang and Ran He present a survey of supervised (SFT) for reasoning . They describe SFT on long data as a foundation for eliciting and enhancing these models’ reasoning abilities, and say the fast-growing field lacks a systematic survey. The authors organize methodological work into data-centric approaches and algorithm-centric innovations, covering the SFT pipeline. They group analytical studies by data characteristics, optimization dynamics and mechanistic insights. By bringing these strands together, the survey aims to clarify current research focuses, remaining bottlenecks and possible future directions. The abstract does not detail those bottlenecks or directions; it presents the paper as a guide to a field whose methods and analysis are developing quickly.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Oct 13, 2026 (2026-10-13).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T08:10:14.086Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:42:58.992Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T05:32:19.366Z.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the abstract, which does not specify the survey’s examples, the remaining bottlenecks, or the future directions it identifies.
Open question
Which specific bottlenecks and future directions does the survey identify?
Source-stated
The authors describe supervised fine-tuning on long chain-of-thought data as a crucial foundation for eliciting and enhancing reasoning abilities in large reasoning models.
supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on long chain-of-thought data serves as a crucial foundation for eliciting and enhancing their reasoning abilities.
Source-stated
The authors say the field lacks a systematic survey consolidating its fast-growing literature on reasoning-oriented SFT.
the field still lacks a systematic survey that consolidates its fast-growing literature.
Source-stated
The survey organizes methodological improvements into data-centric approaches and algorithm-centric innovations, and analytical studies by data characteristics, optimization dynamics and mechanistic insights.
we review methodological improvements across the SFT pipeline and categorize them into data-centric approaches and algorithm-centric innovations.
Source-stated
The authors say they synthesize current research focuses and remaining bottlenecks and outline promising future directions.
by synthesizing current research focuses and remaining bottlenecks, we outline promising future directions for reasoning SFT.
Source and contributor context
Yu, Yongcan, Guo, Kuangpu, Liang, Jian, He, Lingxiao, Wang, Meng, He, Ran · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Fine-tuning
Further training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Chain of thought
The step-by-step working a model writes out before giving its final answer.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 3beb27b1-b9f0-4125-8fda-ea412a90353f.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T08:10:14.086Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: useful_perspective.
Observation: 29b04d4a899a433062665f4b4d2263a5742eaec7e0840106e83067f9d8fe02bb. Source text hash: 7f8fe04604a293299a5ffbc01e3d01a38ce4b4055cd65be1b75ea38a04895964.
passed · 2026-11-11T08:10:14.086Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 3beb27b1-b9f0-4125-8fda-ea412a90353f
attribution — pass: The six named authors match the arXiv listing, and the claims are framed as the authors' descriptions. The title's attribution to the arXiv cs.AI feed is consistent: the paper's primary category is cs.CL, but it is cross-listed in cs.AI.
Authors:Yongcan Yu, Kuangpu Guo, Jian Liang, Lingxiao He, Meng Wang, Ran He
summary — pass: The summary faithfully conveys the survey's motivation, its two-part organization (methodological and analytical) and its stated aim. It also says the abstract does not detail the bottlenecks or future directions. Terms such as SFT, chain-of-thought, optimization dynamics and mechanistic insights are kept exactly and left for term-library tooltips, which is acceptable under the term policy. The question asks about a genuine unresolved gap. Omitting the EMNLP 2026 acceptance note is minor.
we present a comprehensive review of recent advancements in reasoning SFT, examining the literature through the dual lenses of methodological design and analytical investigation.
date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-10-13 matches the v1 submission date. The later feed date is correctly not used.
[Submitted on 13 Oct 2026]
support — pass: Each claim is source-stated and backed by verbatim abstract text. The reading adds no inferred benefits, costs or real-world reliability claims. It also states that the abstract gives no specific bottlenecks.
Second, we reorganize analytical studies along three dimensions: data characteristics, optimization dynamics, and mechanistic insights.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified, direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct access to the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
Further training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
Definition referenceA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceThe step-by-step working a model writes out before giving its final answer.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivFurther training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
Definition referenceA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceThe step-by-step working a model writes out before giving its final answer.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv