Jin, Haoran, Lian, Defu, Wang, Xiting, Xie, Hong · Oct 28, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: MUSE gives scientific coding agents layered memory
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Authors Haoran Jin, Defu Lian, Xiting Wang and Hong Xie introduce MUSE, a memory management framework for scientific coding agents. They argue that task-level retrieval can miss implementation lessons that become relevant while an agent is working. MUSE builds global, approach-level and implementation-level memory from past trajectories. At initialization, the agent receives global memory and problem-matched approach-level memory; during execution, current interactions retrieve implementation-level memory. An gate selects relevant experience and generates review advice, or skips injection. The authors report that MUSE outperforms retrieval and memory baselines on all evaluation metrics across four covering numerical problem solving, kernel optimization and scientific software repair. They say ablations support the multi-level design and gated injection, while transfer experiments show memory remains useful across kernel benchmarks. The paper is marked under review. The abstract gives no metric values or detailed benchmark conditions, so the scale and conditions of the reported gains cannot be assessed from this evidence.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Oct 28, 2026 (2026-10-28).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T13:10:58.190Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:40:48.405Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T10:02:45.034Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The evidence is the paper’s abstract; it does not provide metric values or detailed conditions, limiting assessment of the reported gains. The paper is marked “Under review.”
Open question
What were the evaluation metrics and conditions, and how large were MUSE’s gains over the retrieval and memory baselines?
Source-stated
The authors introduce MUSE, which combines memory at multiple levels with selective runtime injection for scientific coding agents.
We introduce MUSE, a memory management framework combining multi-level memory with selective runtime injection for scientific coding agents.
Source-stated
MUSE builds global, approach-level and implementation-level memory; implementation-level memory is retrieved during execution using current interactions.
During execution, current interactions are used to retrieve implementation-level memory.
Source-stated
An LLM gate selects relevant experience and produces review advice, or skips injection.
An LLM gate selects relevant experience and generates specific review advice, or skips injection.
Source-stated
The authors report that MUSE outperforms retrieval and memory baselines on all evaluation metrics across four benchmarks.
Across four benchmarks spanning numerical problem solving, kernel optimization, and scientific software repair, MUSE outperforms retrieval and memory baselines on all evaluation metrics.
Source-stated
The authors report that ablations support the design and that memory remains useful across kernel benchmarks in transfer experiments.
Ablations support the multi-level design and gated injection, while transfer experiments show that memory remains useful across kernel benchmarks.
Source and contributor context
Jin, Haoran, Lian, Defu, Wang, Xiting, Xie, Hong · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: a4390737-40ed-4a34-8a27-e66f770f287b.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T13:10:58.190Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 8220901257e3dc9d8b1d4fc21a64fee77c25571a01c9f3916ce026175fb77553. Source text hash: e695422e9e340d8b4f8a49e2d4350a9a324ed86e9280f1122f6629f3fe95471f.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-11T13:10:58.190Z
arXiv cs.AI: MUSE gives scientific coding agents layered memory
Authors Haoran Jin, Defu Lian, Xiting Wang and Hong Xie introduce MUSE, a memory management framework for scientific coding agents. They argue that task-level retrieval can miss implementation lessons that become relevant while an agent is working. MUSE builds global, approach-level and implementation-level memory from past trajectories. At initialization, the agent receives global memory and problem-matched approach-level memory; during execution, current interactions retrieve implementation-level memory. An gate selects relevant experience and generates review advice, or skips injection. The authors report that MUSE outperforms retrieval and memory baselines on all evaluation metrics across four covering numerical problem solving, kernel optimization and scientific software repair. They say ablations support the multi-level design and gated injection, while transfer experiments show memory remains useful across kernel benchmarks. The paper is marked under review. The abstract gives no metric values or detailed benchmark conditions, so the scale and conditions of the reported gains cannot be assessed from this evidence.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Oct 28, 2026 (2026-10-28).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T13:10:58.190Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:40:48.405Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T10:02:45.034Z.
Limits
The evidence is the paper’s abstract; it does not provide metric values or detailed conditions, limiting assessment of the reported gains. The paper is marked “Under review.”
Open question
What were the evaluation metrics and conditions, and how large were MUSE’s gains over the retrieval and memory baselines?
Source-stated
The authors introduce MUSE, which combines memory at multiple levels with selective runtime injection for scientific coding agents.
We introduce MUSE, a memory management framework combining multi-level memory with selective runtime injection for scientific coding agents.
Source-stated
MUSE builds global, approach-level and implementation-level memory; implementation-level memory is retrieved during execution using current interactions.
During execution, current interactions are used to retrieve implementation-level memory.
Source-stated
An LLM gate selects relevant experience and produces review advice, or skips injection.
An LLM gate selects relevant experience and generates specific review advice, or skips injection.
Source-stated
The authors report that MUSE outperforms retrieval and memory baselines on all evaluation metrics across four benchmarks.
Across four benchmarks spanning numerical problem solving, kernel optimization, and scientific software repair, MUSE outperforms retrieval and memory baselines on all evaluation metrics.
Source-stated
The authors report that ablations support the design and that memory remains useful across kernel benchmarks in transfer experiments.
Ablations support the multi-level design and gated injection, while transfer experiments show that memory remains useful across kernel benchmarks.
Source and contributor context
Jin, Haoran, Lian, Defu, Wang, Xiting, Xie, Hong · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: a4390737-40ed-4a34-8a27-e66f770f287b.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T13:10:58.190Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 8220901257e3dc9d8b1d4fc21a64fee77c25571a01c9f3916ce026175fb77553. Source text hash: e695422e9e340d8b4f8a49e2d4350a9a324ed86e9280f1122f6629f3fe95471f.
uncertain · 2026-11-11T13:10:58.190Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: a4390737-40ed-4a34-8a27-e66f770f287b
attribution — pass: The draft correctly names authors Haoran Jin, Defu Lian, Xiting Wang and Hong Xie and keeps performance results attributed to them ("The authors report"). The arXiv cs.AI label matches the publisher field, and the paper is cross-listed in cs.AI.
Authors:Haoran Jin, Defu Lian, Xiting Wang, Hong Xie
summary — uncertain: The summary follows the abstract faithfully, and the question is substantive. But central terms are not explained for a general reader: scientific coding agents, trajectories (past agent work logs), kernel optimization, ablations, LLM gate and injection. It also never says in plain words why reusing an agent's past experience could matter. Smallest repair: add one plain-language gloss sentence, or term-library tooltips for trajectories, ablations and kernel optimization, without adding new claims.
MUSE builds global, approach-level, and implementation-level memory from historical trajectories.
date — pass: originalPublished 2026-10-28 matches the v1 submission date. The later feed date of Oct 31 is correctly not used.
[Submitted on 28 Oct 2026]
support — pass: Every claim matches the abstract wording and stays attributed. The stated limitations, which note that the abstract has no metric values and that the paper is under review, are accurate and avoid turning benchmark results into real-world reliability.
Across four benchmarks spanning numerical problem solving, kernel optimization, and scientific software repair, MUSE outperforms retrieval and memory baselines on all evaluation metrics.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page. This is the most direct way to access the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition reference