Chen, Chen, Bagherieh, Omid, Balaji, Naveen Nikamanth Appiah, Gonzalez, Jesse T., Heravi, Negin, Islam, Fahad, Li, Xueting, Regli, Jean-Baptiste, Ren, Kejia, Švec, Petr, Yoon, David J., Müller, Matthias, Koltun, Vladlen · Nov 6, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: On Agentic Manipulation Policies
Markdown · JSON · Original source
The authors of “On Manipulation Policies” argue that generalist AI models can control robot manipulators more reliably than specialist policies. Their agentic manipulation policies (AMPs) let a generalist AI model command a manipulator directly and adapt its actions as a task unfolds. The authors present AMP1, a reference harness that runs across single-arm, bimanual, and mobile manipulation, without demonstrations or task-specific training. They report an 85.6% success rate on RoboLab-120, compared with 49.2% and 42.9% for leading vision-language-action models (VLAs) and world-action models (WAMs). In real-world trials, they report success in 104 of 108 attempts across twelve tasks and three robot instances, with failure rates 20x and 15x lower than strong VLA and WAM baselines. The authors say the basic harness has no supplied grasping, pushing, or placing skills; the agent develops strategies including searching for hidden objects, using objects as tools, and calibrating cameras. They also report that adding a persistent memory store lowers failure rates on RoboDojo bimanual manipulation tasks by 4.6x relative to zero-shot deployment. The authors describe AMPs as a promising foundation for robot manipulation. The abstract does not provide task-by-task results or full evaluation details.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 6, 2026 (2026-11-06).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-12T22:19:52.471Z. First observed: 2026-11-09T05:04:17.047Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-12T22:18:52.153Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied source is an page containing the paper’s abstract, not its full evaluation details; it does not report AMP1’s results separately for each real-world task. The reported and real-world results are claims made in the abstract; this evidence does not independently verify them.
Open question
How did AMP1’s success and failure rates vary across the twelve real-world tasks?
Source-stated
The authors argue that generalist AI models can control manipulators more reliably than specialist policies, and describe AMPs as generalist models that command a manipulator directly while adapting actions as the task unfolds.
We show that generalist AI models can control manipulators more reliably than specialist policies such as vision-language-action models (VLAs) and world-action models (WAMs). We systematically analyze agentic manipulation policies (AMPs), in which a generalist AI model commands the manipulator
Source-stated
The authors report AMP1 achieves an 85.6% zero-shot success rate on RoboLab-120, compared with 49.2% and 42.9% for leading VLA and WAM policies.
On RoboLab-120, AMP1 reaches an 85.6\% success rate zero-shot, compared to 49.2\% and 42.9\% for leading VLA and WAM policies.
Source-stated
The authors report AMP1 succeeded in 104 of 108 real-world trials spanning twelve tasks and three robot instances, with failure rates 20x and 15x lower than strong VLA and WAM baselines.
The agent succeeds zero-shot in 104 of 108 real-world trials spanning twelve tasks and three robot instances, reducing failure rates by 20x and 15x relative to strong VLA and WAM baselines.
Source-stated
The authors say the basic harness supplies no grasping, pushing, or placing skills, and that the agent develops strategies including searching for hidden objects, using objects as tools, and calibrating its cameras.
The basic harness supplies no grasping, pushing, or placing skills; the agent develops its own strategies, such as searching for hidden objects, using objects as tools, and calibrating its cameras.
Source-stated
The authors report that adding a persistent memory store to the harness lowers failure rates on RoboDojo bimanual manipulation tasks by 4.6x relative to zero-shot deployment.
With the addition of a persistent memory store, the agent can also learn from experience: an augmented harness with a memory representation that is carried across episodes lowers the failure rate on RoboDojo bimanual manipulation tasks by 4.6x relative to zero-shot deployment.
Source and contributor context
Chen, Chen, Bagherieh, Omid, Balaji, Naveen Nikamanth Appiah, Gonzalez, Jesse T., Heravi, Negin, Islam, Fahad, Li, Xueting, Regli, Jean-Baptiste, Ren, Kejia, Švec, Petr, Yoon, David J., Müller, Matthias, Koltun, Vladlen · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Agentic AI
AI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer.
Zero-shot
Doing a task without worked examples (zero-shot) or with only a few examples given in the prompt (few-shot).
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: de2a678b-bcb3-4f65-8cbf-9fb4461de754.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-12T22:19:52.471Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 8873ae19d3f1ac2d0ff6086ebe956e2a578918c601fa8080df97d8249a50a44e. Source text hash: c053c15e9287472aa50a7a84d3545558e3b9373fb5b73484c4dc22668ed11d54.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-12T22:19:52.471Z
arXiv cs.AI: On Agentic Manipulation Policies
The authors of “On Manipulation Policies” argue that generalist AI models can control robot manipulators more reliably than specialist policies. Their agentic manipulation policies (AMPs) let a generalist AI model command a manipulator directly and adapt its actions as a task unfolds. The authors present AMP1, a reference harness that runs across single-arm, bimanual, and mobile manipulation, without demonstrations or task-specific training. They report an 85.6% success rate on RoboLab-120, compared with 49.2% and 42.9% for leading vision-language-action models (VLAs) and world-action models (WAMs). In real-world trials, they report success in 104 of 108 attempts across twelve tasks and three robot instances, with failure rates 20x and 15x lower than strong VLA and WAM baselines. The authors say the basic harness has no supplied grasping, pushing, or placing skills; the agent develops strategies including searching for hidden objects, using objects as tools, and calibrating cameras. They also report that adding a persistent memory store lowers failure rates on RoboDojo bimanual manipulation tasks by 4.6x relative to zero-shot deployment. The authors describe AMPs as a promising foundation for robot manipulation. The abstract does not provide task-by-task results or full evaluation details.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 6, 2026 (2026-11-06).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-12T22:19:52.471Z. First observed: 2026-11-09T05:04:17.047Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-12T22:18:52.153Z.
Limits
The supplied source is an page containing the paper’s abstract, not its full evaluation details; it does not report AMP1’s results separately for each real-world task. The reported and real-world results are claims made in the abstract; this evidence does not independently verify them.
Open question
How did AMP1’s success and failure rates vary across the twelve real-world tasks?
Source-stated
The authors argue that generalist AI models can control manipulators more reliably than specialist policies, and describe AMPs as generalist models that command a manipulator directly while adapting actions as the task unfolds.
We show that generalist AI models can control manipulators more reliably than specialist policies such as vision-language-action models (VLAs) and world-action models (WAMs). We systematically analyze agentic manipulation policies (AMPs), in which a generalist AI model commands the manipulator
Source-stated
The authors report AMP1 achieves an 85.6% zero-shot success rate on RoboLab-120, compared with 49.2% and 42.9% for leading VLA and WAM policies.
On RoboLab-120, AMP1 reaches an 85.6\% success rate zero-shot, compared to 49.2\% and 42.9\% for leading VLA and WAM policies.
Source-stated
The authors report AMP1 succeeded in 104 of 108 real-world trials spanning twelve tasks and three robot instances, with failure rates 20x and 15x lower than strong VLA and WAM baselines.
The agent succeeds zero-shot in 104 of 108 real-world trials spanning twelve tasks and three robot instances, reducing failure rates by 20x and 15x relative to strong VLA and WAM baselines.
Source-stated
The authors say the basic harness supplies no grasping, pushing, or placing skills, and that the agent develops strategies including searching for hidden objects, using objects as tools, and calibrating its cameras.
The basic harness supplies no grasping, pushing, or placing skills; the agent develops its own strategies, such as searching for hidden objects, using objects as tools, and calibrating its cameras.
Source-stated
The authors report that adding a persistent memory store to the harness lowers failure rates on RoboDojo bimanual manipulation tasks by 4.6x relative to zero-shot deployment.
With the addition of a persistent memory store, the agent can also learn from experience: an augmented harness with a memory representation that is carried across episodes lowers the failure rate on RoboDojo bimanual manipulation tasks by 4.6x relative to zero-shot deployment.
Source and contributor context
Chen, Chen, Bagherieh, Omid, Balaji, Naveen Nikamanth Appiah, Gonzalez, Jesse T., Heravi, Negin, Islam, Fahad, Li, Xueting, Regli, Jean-Baptiste, Ren, Kejia, Švec, Petr, Yoon, David J., Müller, Matthias, Koltun, Vladlen · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Agentic AI
AI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer.
Zero-shot
Doing a task without worked examples (zero-shot) or with only a few examples given in the prompt (few-shot).
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: de2a678b-bcb3-4f65-8cbf-9fb4461de754.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-12T22:19:52.471Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 8873ae19d3f1ac2d0ff6086ebe956e2a578918c601fa8080df97d8249a50a44e. Source text hash: c053c15e9287472aa50a7a84d3545558e3b9373fb5b73484c4dc22668ed11d54.
uncertain · 2026-11-12T22:19:52.471Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: de2a678b-bcb3-4f65-8cbf-9fb4461de754
attribution — pass: The reading attributes the claims to the paper's authors and keeps the benchmark results as their reported findings. Rendering the abstract's 'We show' as 'argue' or 'report' keeps the claim attributed without overstating it. The arXiv page lists the authors and the cs.AI cross-listing, consistent with the publisher label.
Authors:Chen Chen, Omid Bagherieh, Naveen Nikamanth Appiah Balaji, Jesse T. Gonzalez
summary — uncertain: The figures and the question are faithful, but several central terms are never explained in plain language: manipulator (robot arm or gripper), policy, reference harness, zero-shot (no task-specific training or examples), bimanual, and VLA/WAM beyond their expanded names. A reader without a robotics background cannot easily tell what changed or why it matters. Smallest repair: add term-library tooltips for harness, zero-shot, policy and manipulator, plus one plain sentence on the stakes. Minor fidelity gap: the abstract says AMP1 'runs unchanged' across robot types, but the reading drops 'unchanged', which weakens a central generality point.
We present AMP1, a reference harness that runs unchanged across single-arm, bimanual, and mobile manipulation.
date — pass: The originalPublished value of 2026-11-06 matches the v1 submission date. It does not use the later feed date.
[Submitted on 6 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Every claim and number (85.6%, 49.2%, 42.9%, 104 of 108 trials, 20x and 15x, 4.6x) matches the abstract. The limitations correctly note that only the abstract is available and that the results are unverified. The question about per-task variation follows from that missing detail and is not leading.
The agent succeeds zero-shot in 104 of 108 real-world trials spanning twelve tasks and three robot instances
media — pass: The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the direct original source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
AI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer.
Definition referenceDoing a task without worked examples (zero-shot) or with only a few examples given in the prompt (few-shot).
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceAI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer.
Definition referenceDoing a task without worked examples (zero-shot) or with only a few examples given in the prompt (few-shot).
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition reference