Zhang, Tianwei, Nyagwencha, Ivy Njoki, Dirani, Zahraa, Joshi, Shalini, Hale, Scott A. · Nov 4, 2026
arXiv cs.AI paper introduces ALTO, a TFGBV dataset in three languages
Markdown · JSON · Original source
The authors of ALTO describe a community-led effort to build a dataset for detecting tech-facilitated gender-based violence (TFGBV) in Levantine Arabic, African French and Swahili. They worked with civil society organizations in Jordan, Francophone West Africa and Kenya to crowdsource culturally and linguistically relevant examples, then used active learning to annotate 3,022 instances. Their and experiments found that existing harmful content detection models had poor TFGBV recall on ALTO, and that fine-tuning improved performance. Yet models often missed covert harms across all three languages, and error rates were markedly higher in Swahili. The authors present ALTO as a resource to improve detection in languages less represented in existing datasets and models, and report releasing its annotation taxonomy, dataset and trained models. The findings make the limits visible: adapting models can improve benchmark performance, but the reported experiments also leave covert harms and uneven error rates as concerns. The abstract does not provide the size of the improvements or establish how performance carries over beyond ALTO’s dataset.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 4, 2026 (2026-11-04).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T03:08:13.165Z. First observed: 2026-11-05T05:06:41.146Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T03:02:59.078Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied source is the abstract; it does not give the numerical gains or language-specific error rates. The reported performance is on ALTO; the abstract does not establish how it carries over to content outside the dataset.
Open question
How large were the gains and the differences in error rates across the three languages in the reported experiments?
Source-stated
The authors developed ALTO, a dataset of 3,022 crowdsourced, annotated TFGBV instances in Levantine Arabic, African French and Swahili, working with civil society organizations in Jordan, Francophone West Africa and Kenya.
In collaboration with civil society organizations (CSOs) from Jordan, Francophone West Africa, and Kenya, we developed a community-led approach to crowdsource culturally and linguistically relevant instances of TFGBV in Levantine Arabic, African French, and Swahili.
Source-stated
In the authors’ benchmark and fine-tuning experiments, existing harmful content detection models had poor TFGBV recall on ALTO, and fine-tuning improved performance.
existing harmful content detection models show poor TFGBV recall within ALTO and improve with fine-tuning.
Source-stated
The authors report that models often missed covert harms across all three languages, with markedly higher error rates in Swahili.
models often miss covert harms across all languages, while error rates are markedly higher in Swahili.
Source-stated
The authors report releasing ALTO’s annotation taxonomy, dataset and trained models.
We report the experimental results and release the annotation taxonomy, dataset, and trained models.
Source and contributor context
Zhang, Tianwei, Nyagwencha, Ivy Njoki, Dirani, Zahraa, Joshi, Shalini, Hale, Scott A. · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Fine-tuning
Further training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: cfac2e4e-c7f8-4f17-8b38-dd2afe7f9b2d.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T03:08:13.165Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: c49b2d3a3c058063a4fa3e18508eb437fb0e963adebea65084b8c63cb21c8544. Source text hash: 95d0dbeff2f5af66af9dc187b1f41472dfab377420d6589286a3f6b0d6caad76.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-10T03:08:13.165Z
arXiv cs.AI paper introduces ALTO, a TFGBV dataset in three languages
The authors of ALTO describe a community-led effort to build a dataset for detecting tech-facilitated gender-based violence (TFGBV) in Levantine Arabic, African French and Swahili. They worked with civil society organizations in Jordan, Francophone West Africa and Kenya to crowdsource culturally and linguistically relevant examples, then used active learning to annotate 3,022 instances. Their and experiments found that existing harmful content detection models had poor TFGBV recall on ALTO, and that fine-tuning improved performance. Yet models often missed covert harms across all three languages, and error rates were markedly higher in Swahili. The authors present ALTO as a resource to improve detection in languages less represented in existing datasets and models, and report releasing its annotation taxonomy, dataset and trained models. The findings make the limits visible: adapting models can improve benchmark performance, but the reported experiments also leave covert harms and uneven error rates as concerns. The abstract does not provide the size of the improvements or establish how performance carries over beyond ALTO’s dataset.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 4, 2026 (2026-11-04).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T03:08:13.165Z. First observed: 2026-11-05T05:06:41.146Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T03:02:59.078Z.
Limits
The supplied source is the abstract; it does not give the numerical gains or language-specific error rates. The reported performance is on ALTO; the abstract does not establish how it carries over to content outside the dataset.
Open question
How large were the gains and the differences in error rates across the three languages in the reported experiments?
Source-stated
The authors developed ALTO, a dataset of 3,022 crowdsourced, annotated TFGBV instances in Levantine Arabic, African French and Swahili, working with civil society organizations in Jordan, Francophone West Africa and Kenya.
In collaboration with civil society organizations (CSOs) from Jordan, Francophone West Africa, and Kenya, we developed a community-led approach to crowdsource culturally and linguistically relevant instances of TFGBV in Levantine Arabic, African French, and Swahili.
Source-stated
In the authors’ benchmark and fine-tuning experiments, existing harmful content detection models had poor TFGBV recall on ALTO, and fine-tuning improved performance.
existing harmful content detection models show poor TFGBV recall within ALTO and improve with fine-tuning.
Source-stated
The authors report that models often missed covert harms across all three languages, with markedly higher error rates in Swahili.
models often miss covert harms across all languages, while error rates are markedly higher in Swahili.
Source-stated
The authors report releasing ALTO’s annotation taxonomy, dataset and trained models.
We report the experimental results and release the annotation taxonomy, dataset, and trained models.
Source and contributor context
Zhang, Tianwei, Nyagwencha, Ivy Njoki, Dirani, Zahraa, Joshi, Shalini, Hale, Scott A. · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Fine-tuning
Further training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: cfac2e4e-c7f8-4f17-8b38-dd2afe7f9b2d.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T03:08:13.165Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: c49b2d3a3c058063a4fa3e18508eb437fb0e963adebea65084b8c63cb21c8544. Source text hash: 95d0dbeff2f5af66af9dc187b1f41472dfab377420d6589286a3f6b0d6caad76.
passed · 2026-11-10T03:08:13.165Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: cfac2e4e-c7f8-4f17-8b38-dd2afe7f9b2d
attribution — pass: The reading attributes the work and findings to the paper's authors throughout, using phrasing such as 'the authors report.' It does not present the results as established fact. The title calls it an 'arXiv cs.AI paper.' The primary listing is cs.CL with a cs.AI cross-list, which matches the feed source and is not a misattribution.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
summary — pass: The reading leads with the actor and the development, and it spells out TFGBV in full. It conveys the key findings: poor recall, gains from fine-tuning, missed covert harms, and higher Swahili error rates. It also gives the motivation, which is that existing data is dominated by Global North languages. Terms like recall, active learning and fine-tuning are left to tooltips, but their gist comes through in context. The closing interpretation is modest and stays faithful. The question follows from a real gap in the abstract.
Current models and annotated datasets for gendered harm detection are dominated by data from, and models trained in, Global North languages.
date — pass: The originalPublished date, 2026-11-04, matches the v1 submission date on arXiv. It is not the later feed entry date.
[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Every claim is a near-verbatim match to the abstract. The limitations accurately note that the abstract gives no numerical gains, no per-language rates and no evidence of generalization beyond the dataset. No benefits or costs are invented.
existing harmful content detection models show poor TFGBV recall within ALTO and improve with fine-tuning
media — pass: The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page. It is the direct original source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceFurther training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivFurther training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
Definition referenceFurther training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceFurther training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivFurther training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
Definition referenceFurther training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.
Definition reference