Wu, Yecheng, Han, Song, Cai, Han · Sep 13, 2026
arXiv cs.AI paper: Lightning Weave: Improving the Accuracy-Efficiency Frontier of Reasoning Models through Capability Composition
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Yecheng Wu, Song Han, and Han Cai introduce Lightning Weave, a post-training framework that combines capabilities learned by separately post-trained models. The authors describe using on-policy distillation to compose those capabilities in a student model. They say cached signals let subsequent training proceed without serving multiple live anchor models at once. On mathematics and code , the authors report improved accuracy with fewer response tokens, including results for Qwen3.5-4B. They also report that adjusting the relative strengths of the anchor signals yields an empirical accuracy-efficiency Pareto frontier. These are benchmark results; how well the method transfers to other tasks or settings remains open.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Sep 13, 2026 (2026-09-13).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-14T01:33:29.584Z. First observed: 2026-10-28T08:22:34.898Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-30T22:34:32.871Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The source labels the paper “Work in progress.” The supplied abstract reports results on mathematics and code ; it does not establish performance on other tasks or settings.
Open question
How does Lightning Weave perform on tasks or settings beyond the mathematics and code reported in the paper?
Source-stated
The authors introduce Lightning Weave, a post-training framework that composes capabilities learned by separately post-trained models in one student through on-policy distillation.
We introduce Lightning Weave, a post-training framework that extracts and composes these independently learned capabilities in a single student through on-policy distillation.
Source-stated
The method uses cached signals so subsequent student training does not require multiple live anchor models to be served concurrently.
Each anchor pair scores the cached trajectories once, enabling subsequent student training without serving multiple live anchor models concurrently.
Source-stated
On Qwen3.5-4B, the paper reports higher HMMT 2025 accuracy with fewer response tokens than the base student.
On Qwen3.5-4B, it raises HMMT 2025 accuracy from 59.2% to 64.0% with 10.7% fewer response tokens
Source-stated
On Qwen3.5-4B, the paper reports higher LiveCodeBench v5 accuracy with fewer response tokens than the base student.
and LiveCodeBench v5 accuracy from 41.7% to 54.2% with 9.6% fewer response tokens.
Source-stated
The authors report that varying the relative strengths of the anchor signals yields an empirical accuracy-efficiency Pareto frontier.
Adjusting the relative strengths of the anchor signals yields a strong empirical accuracy-efficiency Pareto frontier.
Source and contributor context
Wu, Yecheng, Han, Song, Cai, Han · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Reasoning model
A language model trained to work through a problem in written steps before it answers.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 139b1620-d481-4ed3-8ebd-4072e12b74ab.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-14T01:33:29.584Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 8673693d1bd216ece9e1f41c9671c5232b6e2cd5c7fc6ad83581a3a93c004095. Source text hash: e6c08348ffa6c47a39875fdf5e8bc4a212307ba1bf79ecf87ed4151d0030a391.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-14T01:33:29.584Z
arXiv cs.AI paper: Lightning Weave: Improving the Accuracy-Efficiency Frontier of Reasoning Models through Capability Composition
Yecheng Wu, Song Han, and Han Cai introduce Lightning Weave, a post-training framework that combines capabilities learned by separately post-trained models. The authors describe using on-policy distillation to compose those capabilities in a student model. They say cached signals let subsequent training proceed without serving multiple live anchor models at once. On mathematics and code , the authors report improved accuracy with fewer response tokens, including results for Qwen3.5-4B. They also report that adjusting the relative strengths of the anchor signals yields an empirical accuracy-efficiency Pareto frontier. These are benchmark results; how well the method transfers to other tasks or settings remains open.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Sep 13, 2026 (2026-09-13).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-14T01:33:29.584Z. First observed: 2026-10-28T08:22:34.898Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-30T22:34:32.871Z.
Limits
The source labels the paper “Work in progress.” The supplied abstract reports results on mathematics and code ; it does not establish performance on other tasks or settings.
Open question
How does Lightning Weave perform on tasks or settings beyond the mathematics and code reported in the paper?
Source-stated
The authors introduce Lightning Weave, a post-training framework that composes capabilities learned by separately post-trained models in one student through on-policy distillation.
We introduce Lightning Weave, a post-training framework that extracts and composes these independently learned capabilities in a single student through on-policy distillation.
Source-stated
The method uses cached signals so subsequent student training does not require multiple live anchor models to be served concurrently.
Each anchor pair scores the cached trajectories once, enabling subsequent student training without serving multiple live anchor models concurrently.
Source-stated
On Qwen3.5-4B, the paper reports higher HMMT 2025 accuracy with fewer response tokens than the base student.
On Qwen3.5-4B, it raises HMMT 2025 accuracy from 59.2% to 64.0% with 10.7% fewer response tokens
Source-stated
On Qwen3.5-4B, the paper reports higher LiveCodeBench v5 accuracy with fewer response tokens than the base student.
and LiveCodeBench v5 accuracy from 41.7% to 54.2% with 9.6% fewer response tokens.
Source-stated
The authors report that varying the relative strengths of the anchor signals yields an empirical accuracy-efficiency Pareto frontier.
Adjusting the relative strengths of the anchor signals yields a strong empirical accuracy-efficiency Pareto frontier.
Source and contributor context
Wu, Yecheng, Han, Song, Cai, Han · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Reasoning model
A language model trained to work through a problem in written steps before it answers.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 139b1620-d481-4ed3-8ebd-4072e12b74ab.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-14T01:33:29.584Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 8673693d1bd216ece9e1f41c9671c5232b6e2cd5c7fc6ad83581a3a93c004095. Source text hash: e6c08348ffa6c47a39875fdf5e8bc4a212307ba1bf79ecf87ed4151d0030a391.
uncertain · 2026-11-14T01:33:29.584Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 139b1620-d481-4ed3-8ebd-4072e12b74ab
attribution — pass: The reading correctly credits Yecheng Wu, Song Han and Han Cai. It keeps the method description and benchmark results framed as the authors' claims rather than established facts.
Authors:Yecheng Wu, Song Han, Han Cai
summary — uncertain: The summary is faithful but hard to follow without specialist background. It never states the paper's core motivation: improving accuracy and efficiency together is hard because they can favor different reasoning behaviors, and separately post-trained specialists are strong in each. Terms such as anchor models, on-policy distillation, student model, response tokens and Pareto frontier also go unexplained. Smallest repair: add one sentence stating this accuracy-versus-efficiency tension. Also say plainly that one specialist is accurate, another is efficient, and the student learns both. Add term-library tooltips for these terms.
jointly improving reasoning accuracy and inference efficiency can be challenging, as the two objectives can favor different reasoning behaviors
date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-09-13 matches the v1 submission date. It is not the later v3 revision or the feed date.
[Submitted on 13 Sep 2026 (v1), last revised 26 Oct 2026 (this version, v3)]
support — pass: Each claim quotes the abstract accurately, including the Qwen3.5-4B figures for HMMT 2025 and LiveCodeBench v5. The limitations are grounded, citing the work-in-progress label and the math and code scope. The open question follows from that scope without implying unsupported benefits.
On Qwen3.5-4B, it raises HMMT 2025 accuracy from 59.2% to 64.0% with 10.7% fewer response tokens
media — pass: The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page itself. It is the direct original source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition reference