Yadav, Rahul Kumar, Ghosh, Tunir, Ahir, Sudhendu, Pandit, Parthe, Bhagoji, Arjun · Nov 5, 2026
arXiv cs.AI paper: Yadav and coauthors report greater native robustness in kernel machines
Markdown · JSON · Original source
In their paper, Rahul Kumar Yadav and coauthors compare kernel-based models with under adversarial attacks. They report experiments on image and tabular classification tasks, using white-box and black-box evasion attacks, and say kernel machines are natively more robust: their performance degrades more gracefully against adversarial perturbations. The study also evaluates random feature classifiers and Recursive Feature Machines, and presents an algorithm for approximate adversarial training of kernel machines. The authors describe the work as an empirical investigation; the reported comparison concerns the tasks and attacks they tested, not every setting in which these models might be used. The abstract does not give dataset names, numerical results, or details of the training algorithm, so the strength and scope of the reported advantage cannot be assessed from this page alone.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T03:03:30.711Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:10:31.659Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T03:02:24.904Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the abstract; it does not name the datasets, provide numerical results, or describe the approximate adversarial training algorithm, limiting assessment of the reported comparison.
Open question
Across which image and tabular datasets, and under which attack settings, do the authors find kernel machines’ performance degrades more gracefully than ?
Source-stated
The authors report an empirical investigation of adversarial robustness in kernel-based models for binary and multiclass classification, using white-box and black-box evasion attacks.
a thorough empirical investigation of the adversarial robustness of kernel-based models for both binary and multiclass classification tasks, via white-box and black-box evasion attacks
Source-stated
The authors report that kernel machines are natively more robust than neural networks on the classification tasks they tested, with performance degrading more gracefully against adversarial perturbations.
Our experiments on classification tasks on image and tabular datasets strongly indicate that kernel machines are natively more robust than neural networks, i.e., their performance degrades more gracefully against adversarial perturbations.
Source-stated
The paper evaluates random feature classifiers and Recursive Feature Machines, and presents an algorithm for approximate adversarial training of kernel machines.
We evaluate the native robustness of kernel machines, random feature classifiers, and the relatively newer Recursive Feature Machines. In addition, we provide an algorithm for approximate adversarial training of kernel machines.
Source and contributor context
Yadav, Rahul Kumar, Ghosh, Tunir, Ahir, Sudhendu, Pandit, Parthe, Bhagoji, Arjun · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Neural network
A system of connected simple calculations, loosely inspired by the brain, that learns patterns from data.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: dec21a94-8737-43b1-846a-cda514c6a7fe.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T03:03:30.711Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: af8b157bb4b2cc8219a655eed6c179cdde3d2af7f43ab7d7f65dd1859ef2cb7c. Source text hash: b22b2d55be97e66cc402acfbb93050615acf3c057e82ff60abd5e49ebb89a60d.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-09T03:03:30.711Z
arXiv cs.AI paper: Yadav and coauthors report greater native robustness in kernel machines
In their paper, Rahul Kumar Yadav and coauthors compare kernel-based models with under adversarial attacks. They report experiments on image and tabular classification tasks, using white-box and black-box evasion attacks, and say kernel machines are natively more robust: their performance degrades more gracefully against adversarial perturbations. The study also evaluates random feature classifiers and Recursive Feature Machines, and presents an algorithm for approximate adversarial training of kernel machines. The authors describe the work as an empirical investigation; the reported comparison concerns the tasks and attacks they tested, not every setting in which these models might be used. The abstract does not give dataset names, numerical results, or details of the training algorithm, so the strength and scope of the reported advantage cannot be assessed from this page alone.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T03:03:30.711Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:10:31.659Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T03:02:24.904Z.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the abstract; it does not name the datasets, provide numerical results, or describe the approximate adversarial training algorithm, limiting assessment of the reported comparison.
Open question
Across which image and tabular datasets, and under which attack settings, do the authors find kernel machines’ performance degrades more gracefully than ?
Source-stated
The authors report an empirical investigation of adversarial robustness in kernel-based models for binary and multiclass classification, using white-box and black-box evasion attacks.
a thorough empirical investigation of the adversarial robustness of kernel-based models for both binary and multiclass classification tasks, via white-box and black-box evasion attacks
Source-stated
The authors report that kernel machines are natively more robust than neural networks on the classification tasks they tested, with performance degrading more gracefully against adversarial perturbations.
Our experiments on classification tasks on image and tabular datasets strongly indicate that kernel machines are natively more robust than neural networks, i.e., their performance degrades more gracefully against adversarial perturbations.
Source-stated
The paper evaluates random feature classifiers and Recursive Feature Machines, and presents an algorithm for approximate adversarial training of kernel machines.
We evaluate the native robustness of kernel machines, random feature classifiers, and the relatively newer Recursive Feature Machines. In addition, we provide an algorithm for approximate adversarial training of kernel machines.
Source and contributor context
Yadav, Rahul Kumar, Ghosh, Tunir, Ahir, Sudhendu, Pandit, Parthe, Bhagoji, Arjun · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Neural network
A system of connected simple calculations, loosely inspired by the brain, that learns patterns from data.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: dec21a94-8737-43b1-846a-cda514c6a7fe.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T03:03:30.711Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: af8b157bb4b2cc8219a655eed6c179cdde3d2af7f43ab7d7f65dd1859ef2cb7c. Source text hash: b22b2d55be97e66cc402acfbb93050615acf3c057e82ff60abd5e49ebb89a60d.
uncertain · 2026-11-09T03:03:30.711Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: dec21a94-8737-43b1-846a-cda514c6a7fe
attribution — pass: The reading correctly attributes the work and its findings to Rahul Kumar Yadav and coauthors, and frames the robustness result as the authors' report. The title says 'arXiv cs.AI paper', but the page lists cs.LG as the primary category, with cs.AI as a cross-list. This matches the publisher metadata and is not misattribution.
Authors:Rahul Kumar Yadav, Tunir Ghosh, Sudhendu Ahir, Parthe Pandit, Arjun Bhagoji
summary — uncertain: The reading is faithful, but it is not readable on its own for a non-specialist. Its central terms go unexplained: 'kernel machines', 'adversarial attacks/perturbations', 'white-box and black-box evasion attacks' and 'natively more robust'. It also never says why robustness to adversarial examples matters, for example that small deliberate input changes can fool a classifier. Smallest repair: add a one-clause plain gloss of adversarial perturbations and kernel machines, or confirm that term-library tooltips cover them. The question and the scope caveats are well grounded.
their performance degrades more gracefully against adversarial perturbations
date — pass: The displayed original publication date, 2026-11-05, matches the v1 submission date on the arXiv page. It is not the later feed date.
[Submitted on 5 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Each claim is directly supported by the abstract. The reading keeps the result as the authors' empirical finding on the tasks they tested. The limitation correctly notes that the abstract gives no dataset names, numbers or algorithm details. No benefits or costs are invented. The authors' phrase 'strongly indicate' is rendered as 'report', which keeps the claim attributed without inflating it.
Our experiments on classification tasks on image and tabular datasets strongly indicate that kernel machines are natively more robust than neural networks
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page, which is the original source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A system of connected simple calculations, loosely inspired by the brain, that learns patterns from data.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA system of connected simple calculations, loosely inspired by the brain, that learns patterns from data.
Definition referenceA system of connected simple calculations, loosely inspired by the brain, that learns patterns from data.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA system of connected simple calculations, loosely inspired by the brain, that learns patterns from data.
Definition reference