Sui, Yuan, Chen, Yulin, Li, Yibo, Jiang, Xue, He, Yufei, Dong, Yihong, He, Xiaoxin, Gao, Tianyu, Hooi, Bryan · May 7, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: TACT Mitigates Overthinking and Overacting in Coding Agents
Markdown · JSON · Original source
The authors of TACT describe “agent drift” as a decline in coding-agent performance over long task trajectories, marked by overthinking—repeating reasoning about information already available—or overacting—making tool calls without using recent observations or gathering new evidence. They propose detecting these patterns in the residual stream, the model’s internal representations, and using activation steering to pull drifted steps toward what they label calibrated behavior. The authors report that hidden states for the three labels separate along two drift axes, with AUC approximately 0.9. In experiments on SWE-bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0, and CLAW-Eval, they report higher average resolve rates than unsteered baselines: 5.8 percentage points for Qwen3.5-27B and 4.8 percentage points for Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it. They also report that TACT cuts steps-to-resolve by up to 26%. Their argument is that overthinking and overacting can be treated as directions in the residual stream and adjusted during inference, offering a possible method for improving performance on long coding tasks. These results are reported for the named models and ; the abstract does not establish how well the method transfers beyond them.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: May 7, 2026 (2026-05-07).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T19:02:11.454Z. First observed: 2026-11-11T05:04:52.954Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-11T18:50:23.940Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the page and abstract, not the full paper; it does not provide detailed experimental methods or results beyond the abstract’s summary. The reported results cover SWE-bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0, and CLAW-Eval and the two named models; the evidence does not establish performance on other models or tasks.
Open question
How does TACT perform on coding-agent models and tasks beyond the models and reported in the abstract?
Source-stated
The authors define agent drift as a degradation over long coding-agent trajectories, with overthinking and overacting as recurring failure modes.
they often degrade over long trajectories, which we define as *agent drift*. We focus on two recurring failure modes *overthinking* and *overacting*
Source-stated
The authors say overthinking repeats reasoning about information already available, while overacting makes tool calls without integrating recent observations or acquiring new evidence.
where the agent repeatedly reasons over information it already has, and where it issues tool calls without integrating recent observations or acquiring new evidence.
Source-stated
TACT labels trajectory steps as overthinking, overacting, or calibrated and reports that hidden states separate along two drift axes, with AUC approximately 0.9.
we label trajectory steps as overthinking, overacting, or calibrated, and find that their hidden states can separate linearly along two *drift axes*, pointing from calibrated behavior toward each failure mode (AUC $\approx$ 0.9).
Source-stated
The authors report that TACT projects each step’s activation onto the drift axes at test time and pulls drifted steps toward the calibrated region.
we project each step's activation onto these axes at test time and pull drifted ones back toward the calibrated region.
Source-stated
Across the named benchmarks, the authors report average resolve-rate increases of 5.8 percentage points on Qwen3.5-27B and 4.8 percentage points on Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, plus up to a 26% reduction in steps-to-resolve.
lifting average resolve rate by $+5.8$ pp on Qwen3.5-27B and $+4.8$ pp on Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it while cutting steps-to-resolve by up to $26\%$.
Source and contributor context
Sui, Yuan, Chen, Yulin, Li, Yibo, Jiang, Xue, He, Yufei, Dong, Yihong, He, Xiaoxin, Gao, Tianyu, Hooi, Bryan · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: e042a2e6-4202-4ae0-8733-8daaa6da3a26.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T19:02:11.454Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 2d2235a78f6e0fd78b8e1c04d6c24235332b507f938ee8c9ea59e22d53bbb4ab. Source text hash: 011c95fb203c6596cd3b0426fbe6a657587f4bd325992f206ecd5579f1c41e23.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-11T19:02:11.454Z
arXiv cs.AI: TACT Mitigates Overthinking and Overacting in Coding Agents
The authors of TACT describe “agent drift” as a decline in coding-agent performance over long task trajectories, marked by overthinking—repeating reasoning about information already available—or overacting—making tool calls without using recent observations or gathering new evidence. They propose detecting these patterns in the residual stream, the model’s internal representations, and using activation steering to pull drifted steps toward what they label calibrated behavior. The authors report that hidden states for the three labels separate along two drift axes, with AUC approximately 0.9. In experiments on SWE-bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0, and CLAW-Eval, they report higher average resolve rates than unsteered baselines: 5.8 percentage points for Qwen3.5-27B and 4.8 percentage points for Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it. They also report that TACT cuts steps-to-resolve by up to 26%. Their argument is that overthinking and overacting can be treated as directions in the residual stream and adjusted during inference, offering a possible method for improving performance on long coding tasks. These results are reported for the named models and ; the abstract does not establish how well the method transfers beyond them.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: May 7, 2026 (2026-05-07).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T19:02:11.454Z. First observed: 2026-11-11T05:04:52.954Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-11T18:50:23.940Z.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the page and abstract, not the full paper; it does not provide detailed experimental methods or results beyond the abstract’s summary. The reported results cover SWE-bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0, and CLAW-Eval and the two named models; the evidence does not establish performance on other models or tasks.
Open question
How does TACT perform on coding-agent models and tasks beyond the models and reported in the abstract?
Source-stated
The authors define agent drift as a degradation over long coding-agent trajectories, with overthinking and overacting as recurring failure modes.
they often degrade over long trajectories, which we define as *agent drift*. We focus on two recurring failure modes *overthinking* and *overacting*
Source-stated
The authors say overthinking repeats reasoning about information already available, while overacting makes tool calls without integrating recent observations or acquiring new evidence.
where the agent repeatedly reasons over information it already has, and where it issues tool calls without integrating recent observations or acquiring new evidence.
Source-stated
TACT labels trajectory steps as overthinking, overacting, or calibrated and reports that hidden states separate along two drift axes, with AUC approximately 0.9.
we label trajectory steps as overthinking, overacting, or calibrated, and find that their hidden states can separate linearly along two *drift axes*, pointing from calibrated behavior toward each failure mode (AUC $\approx$ 0.9).
Source-stated
The authors report that TACT projects each step’s activation onto the drift axes at test time and pulls drifted steps toward the calibrated region.
we project each step's activation onto these axes at test time and pull drifted ones back toward the calibrated region.
Source-stated
Across the named benchmarks, the authors report average resolve-rate increases of 5.8 percentage points on Qwen3.5-27B and 4.8 percentage points on Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, plus up to a 26% reduction in steps-to-resolve.
lifting average resolve rate by $+5.8$ pp on Qwen3.5-27B and $+4.8$ pp on Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it while cutting steps-to-resolve by up to $26\%$.
Source and contributor context
Sui, Yuan, Chen, Yulin, Li, Yibo, Jiang, Xue, He, Yufei, Dong, Yihong, He, Xiaoxin, Gao, Tianyu, Hooi, Bryan · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: e042a2e6-4202-4ae0-8733-8daaa6da3a26.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T19:02:11.454Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 2d2235a78f6e0fd78b8e1c04d6c24235332b507f938ee8c9ea59e22d53bbb4ab. Source text hash: 011c95fb203c6596cd3b0426fbe6a657587f4bd325992f206ecd5579f1c41e23.
passed · 2026-11-11T19:02:11.454Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: e042a2e6-4202-4ae0-8733-8daaa6da3a26
attribution — pass: The reading attributes the definitions, method and results to the paper's authors as reported claims. The arXiv cs.AI title prefix and the paper-title wording keep the source identity clear.
Authors:Yuan Sui, Yulin Chen, Yibo Li, Xue Jiang, Yufei He, Yihong Dong, Xiaoxin He, Tianyu Gao, Bryan Hooi
summary — pass: The reading leads with the problem the authors define and explains overthinking, overacting and residual stream in plain language. It then covers the steering method, reported gains and the authors' framing. AUC is left technical; it can be covered by a term-library tooltip and does not block understanding. The question follows directly from the stated scope gap.
These gains frame agent drift as a steerable direction in the residual stream, and position TACT as a viable handle for reliable long-horizon agents.
date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-05-07 matches the v1 submission date. It is not the later v3 revision or the November feed date.
[Submitted on 7 May 2026 (v1), last revised 10 Nov 2026 (this version, v3)]
support — pass: All numeric claims match the abstract: AUC about 0.9, +5.8 pp and +4.8 pp, and up to 26% fewer steps. The significance line is hedged as a possible method, which is consistent with the authors' 'viable handle' framing. The limitations accurately note that only the abstract was supplied and that results are limited to the named models and benchmarks.
lifting average resolve rate by $+5.8$ pp on Qwen3.5-27B and $+4.8$ pp on Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it while cutting steps-to-resolve by up to $26\%$.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page. This is the most direct way to reach the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition reference