arXiv cs.AI: Task-aware CT sampling for predicting hemodynamics

arXiv cs.AI: Task-aware CT sampling for predicting hemodynamics

Authors Mahmoud Elhadidy, Roshan M. D'Souza and Amirhossein Arzani investigate choosing CT projections to predict hemodynamics, rather than primarily to reconstruct images. They use computational fluid dynamics simulations of intracranial aneurysms to generate synthetic fan-beam CTA projections, then train a Fourier neural operator (FNO) to predict spatially resolved and spatially averaged time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS). They compare fixed uniform and golden-angle sampling with Gumbel-Softmax, Soft top-K and an agentic AI selector. For spatially resolved TAWSS, the authors report that Agentic and Soft top-K achieve the lowest mean errors and substantially outperform fixed sampling under extreme sparsity; Agentic performs slightly better. For spatially averaged TAWSS, optimized selection matters at extremely sparse acquisitions. The selected masks cluster around multiple informative regions, but masks optimized for hemodynamic prediction yield poor image reconstructions. The authors argue that sparse acquisitions may need to be designed for the downstream physical quantity, not image reconstruction. The results use simulated aneurysms and synthetic projections; the abstract does not report testing on clinical CTA measurements.

Publication: 2109b0ad-7589-4088-825d-ddb1a2160096

attribution — pass: The draft names the three listed authors and attributes the findings to them as reported results. The arXiv cs.AI listing is identified correctly.

Authors:Mahmoud Elhadidy, Roshan M. D'Souza, Amirhossein Arzani

summary — uncertain: The summary is accurate but hard for a general reader to follow. It never says what sparse-view CT does: it reduces the number of acquired projections. It also does not say why selecting fewer projections matters, and that motivation is the paper's premise. Central terms such as hemodynamics, projections, TAWSS, FNO, Gumbel-Softmax, Soft top-K and agentic AI selector are left bare, and no term-library tooltips are indicated. Smallest repair: add the source's framing sentence about reducing acquired projections, and flag these terms for tooltips. The title and question are fine. The simulation-only limitation is well stated.

Sparse-view computed tomography (CT) reduces the number of acquired projections

date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-10-28, which matches the v1 submission date. The feed date of Oct 31 is later and is correctly not used.

[Submitted on 28 Oct 2026]

support — uncertain: The listed claims match the abstract. One summary sentence is stronger than the source: 'The authors argue that sparse acquisitions may need to be designed for the downstream physical quantity' turns the abstract's hedged 'suggests the possibility' into an implied necessity. Smallest repair: 'The authors suggest the possibility of designing sparse acquisitions directly around downstream physical quantities.' The question about clinical CTA is a legitimate open issue and is not a claim.

This work suggests the possibility of designing sparse acquisitions directly around downstream physical quantities.

media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page. It is the most direct and relevant access to the source.