Feng, Xinshun, Miao, Ziqi, Li, Lijun, Shao, Jing · Aug 1, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: Tracing the Cascade: A Topology-Aware Evaluation Framework for Scientific Agent Hallucinations
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Authors Xinshun Feng, Ziqi Miao, Lijun Li and Jing Shao introduce SCHEMA, a framework for evaluating in scientific agents. It builds scientific concept graphs from seeds and literature evidence, then creates tasks and checks both intermediate reasoning and selected failures. The authors report that hallucinations cluster around highly connected knowledge hubs, and that correct final answers can result from flawed reasoning. They argue that final-answer accuracy alone is not enough to assess reliability in high-stakes scientific applications. How well does SCHEMA's evaluation work across different scientific fields and agent systems?
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Aug 1, 2026 (2026-08-01).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-13T22:18:59.198Z. First observed: 2026-10-28T09:00:39.636Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-30T04:18:19.106Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the paper's abstract and does not give quantitative results, scale, or details of how the reported findings vary across scientific fields or agent systems.
Open question
How well does SCHEMA's evaluation work across different scientific fields and agent systems?
Source-stated
The authors introduce SCHEMA as an evidence-grounded, topology-aware framework for evaluating hallucinations in scientific agents.
We address this gap with SCHEMA, the first evidence-grounded, topology-aware evaluation framework for hallucinations in scientific agents.
Source-stated
SCHEMA builds scientific concept graphs from benchmark seeds and literature evidence, and uses them to create several kinds of evaluation tasks.
SCHEMA automatically constructs scientific concept graphs from benchmark seeds and literature evidence, synthesizes graph-grounded tasks spanning claim verification, multi-hop reasoning, open-ended explanation, and experimental code generation
Source-stated
The authors report that hallucinations are concentrated around a small number of highly connected knowledge hubs.
SCHEMA reveals that hallucinations concentrate at a small set of highly connected knowledge hubs
Source-stated
The authors report that correct final answers can still follow structurally flawed reasoning.
models often reach correct conclusions through structurally flawed reasoning.
Source-stated
The authors argue that final-answer accuracy alone is insufficient for judging agent reliability in high-stakes scientific applications.
for high-stakes scientific applications, terminal accuracy alone is an insufficient signal of agent reliability
Source and contributor context
Feng, Xinshun, Miao, Ziqi, Li, Lijun, Shao, Jing · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Hallucination
When an AI system states something false or made up as if it were true.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 5816d45b-3f6f-45be-892e-f6a00ffb1c8d.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-13T22:18:59.198Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 70f3c45abe106f684cb27fa9a02a71d8e18b18273cc3db45a52e5de743409628. Source text hash: e0be5b09ce863c9a320d3fd9809dbeb6478c907f1bab7569de6330bbab7319ca.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-13T22:18:59.198Z
arXiv cs.AI: Tracing the Cascade: A Topology-Aware Evaluation Framework for Scientific Agent Hallucinations
Authors Xinshun Feng, Ziqi Miao, Lijun Li and Jing Shao introduce SCHEMA, a framework for evaluating in scientific agents. It builds scientific concept graphs from seeds and literature evidence, then creates tasks and checks both intermediate reasoning and selected failures. The authors report that hallucinations cluster around highly connected knowledge hubs, and that correct final answers can result from flawed reasoning. They argue that final-answer accuracy alone is not enough to assess reliability in high-stakes scientific applications. How well does SCHEMA's evaluation work across different scientific fields and agent systems?
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Aug 1, 2026 (2026-08-01).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-13T22:18:59.198Z. First observed: 2026-10-28T09:00:39.636Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-30T04:18:19.106Z.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the paper's abstract and does not give quantitative results, scale, or details of how the reported findings vary across scientific fields or agent systems.
Open question
How well does SCHEMA's evaluation work across different scientific fields and agent systems?
Source-stated
The authors introduce SCHEMA as an evidence-grounded, topology-aware framework for evaluating hallucinations in scientific agents.
We address this gap with SCHEMA, the first evidence-grounded, topology-aware evaluation framework for hallucinations in scientific agents.
Source-stated
SCHEMA builds scientific concept graphs from benchmark seeds and literature evidence, and uses them to create several kinds of evaluation tasks.
SCHEMA automatically constructs scientific concept graphs from benchmark seeds and literature evidence, synthesizes graph-grounded tasks spanning claim verification, multi-hop reasoning, open-ended explanation, and experimental code generation
Source-stated
The authors report that hallucinations are concentrated around a small number of highly connected knowledge hubs.
SCHEMA reveals that hallucinations concentrate at a small set of highly connected knowledge hubs
Source-stated
The authors report that correct final answers can still follow structurally flawed reasoning.
models often reach correct conclusions through structurally flawed reasoning.
Source-stated
The authors argue that final-answer accuracy alone is insufficient for judging agent reliability in high-stakes scientific applications.
for high-stakes scientific applications, terminal accuracy alone is an insufficient signal of agent reliability
Source and contributor context
Feng, Xinshun, Miao, Ziqi, Li, Lijun, Shao, Jing · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Hallucination
When an AI system states something false or made up as if it were true.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 5816d45b-3f6f-45be-892e-f6a00ffb1c8d.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-13T22:18:59.198Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 70f3c45abe106f684cb27fa9a02a71d8e18b18273cc3db45a52e5de743409628. Source text hash: e0be5b09ce863c9a320d3fd9809dbeb6478c907f1bab7569de6330bbab7319ca.
uncertain · 2026-11-13T22:18:59.198Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 5816d45b-3f6f-45be-892e-f6a00ffb1c8d
attribution — pass: The reading correctly credits Xinshun Feng, Ziqi Miao, Lijun Li and Jing Shao for SCHEMA. Findings and conclusions stay framed as what the authors report or argue, not as established fact.
Authors:Xinshun Feng, Ziqi Miao, Lijun Li, Jing Shao
summary — uncertain: The summary omits the paper's central motivation, the cascade named in the title: one wrong claim about a foundational concept can spread through multi-step reasoning and corrupt the whole chain. Without that point, a non-specialist cannot see why clustering at hubs matters. It also softens 'often' to 'can'. 'Hallucinations', 'scientific agents' and 'knowledge hubs' go unexplained, and the title only repeats the paper title. Smallest repair: add one sentence on the propagation mechanism with a plain gloss of an agent and a hallucination, and restore 'often'.
a single erroneous claim on a foundational concept can propagate through multi-step reasoning and corrupt entire trajectories
date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-08-01 matches the v1 submission date. It does not use the 27 Oct 2026 v2 revision or the October feed date.
Submitted on 1 Aug 2026 (v1), last revised 27 Oct 2026 (this version, v2)
support — pass: Each claim is directly supported by an abstract excerpt and labeled source-stated. The limitation correctly notes that the evidence gives no quantitative results. The question about generalization across fields and agent systems follows from that gap without presuming an answer. No benefits or costs are invented.
These results indicate that for high-stakes scientific applications, terminal accuracy alone is an insufficient signal of agent reliability
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the original source and the most direct access point.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
When an AI system states something false or made up as if it were true.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceWhen an AI system states something false or made up as if it were true.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition reference