Banwait, Harsidak Singh · Nov 4, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: Transforming Integer Grids to Spatial Intuition: Perception, Not Planning, Governs ARC-AGI-3
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Harsidak Singh Banwait argues that ARC-AGI-3 performance depends more on perceiving spatial structure than on planning. The paper presents SARBLOH, an agent that converts each game frame into an object inventory, a geometric briefing distinguishing proven invariants from affordance hypotheses, and an annotated canvas. Banwait’s account is that raw integer grids obscure spatial relationships, leading models to spend actions rediscovering boundaries and symmetries; SARBLOH instead uses a code-as-action runtime to express algorithmic hypotheses. In the paper’s experiments, grounded perception raises a rubric score from 3/28 to 25/28 and cuts token use by 89.4%. The reported results also draw a boundary: geometric invariants generalized with 100% accuracy on 23 held-out games, but single-frame affordance guesses reached only 6–50%, so active verification probes remain necessary. On the public set, briefing-on Run B reached 63.5% single-pass efficiency, compared with 59.4% for briefing-off Run A. Within a nine-hour budget on one Kaggle RTX PRO 6000 , SARBLOH scored 16.53 on the hidden Kaggle evaluation. As an Escape Meridian interpretation, these results support Banwait’s case for better perception in this ; the abstract does not establish how well the approach transfers beyond ARC-AGI-3.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 4, 2026 (2026-11-04).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T06:53:58.217Z. First observed: 2026-11-05T05:03:30.851Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T06:53:09.825Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The evidence is the abstract, not the full paper; experimental setup and evaluation details beyond the abstract are not available here. The abstract reports ARC-AGI-3 results and does not establish transfer to other interactive environments. The abstract reports strong generalization for geometric invariants but much lower accuracy for single-frame affordance guesses, and says active verification probes remain necessary.
Open question
How would SARBLOH’s reported results change on interactive environments beyond ARC-AGI-3?
Source-stated
Banwait argues that spatial perception, rather than planning capacity, governs interactive reasoning on ARC-AGI-3.
SARBLOH, an open-weight agent built on the premise that spatial perception, not planning capacity, governs interactive reasoning on ARC-AGI-3.
Source-stated
The agent turns each frame into an object inventory, a geometric briefing, and an annotated canvas, then uses a code-as-action runtime to express algorithmic hypotheses.
A zero-parameter O(HW) perception engine turns each frame, in 35 ms, into an object inventory with bipartite temporal tracking, a geometric briefing that separates proven invariants from affordance hypotheses, and an annotated canvas.
Source-stated
The paper reports that grounded perception raised the rubric score from 3/28 to 25/28 while reducing token use by 89.4%.
Across eight presentations, grounded perception raises the rubric score from 3/28 to 25/28 points while cutting token use by 89.4%.
Source-stated
On 23 held-out games, geometric invariants generalized with 100% accuracy, while single-frame affordance guesses ranged from 6% to 50%; the author says active verification probes remain necessary.
On 23 held-out games, geometric invariants generalize with 100% accuracy, while single-frame affordance guesses fall to 6-50%, so active verification probes remain necessary.
Source-stated
On the public set, briefing-on Run B reached 63.5% single-pass efficiency; briefing-off Run A reached 59.4%.
Run A (briefing off) solved 143 of 183 levels in 8.2 hours at 59.4% single-pass efficiency; Run B (briefing on) reached 63.5%.
Source-stated
Within a nine-hour budget on one Kaggle RTX PRO 6000 GPU, SARBLOH scored 16.53 on the hidden Kaggle evaluation.
Within the nine-hour budget on one Kaggle RTX PRO 6000 GPU, SARBLOH scored 16.53 on the hidden Kaggle evaluation, 13.7x the first Milestone winner.
Escape Meridian interpretation
The reported benchmark results support Banwait’s argument about ARC-AGI-3, but the abstract does not report results on other interactive environments.
SARBLOH scored 16.53 on the hidden Kaggle evaluation
Source and contributor context
Banwait, Harsidak Singh · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Open weights
A model whose trained numbers are published so others can download, run and inspect it; the license and training data may still be restricted.
Graphics processing unit
A chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: ae82ee90-f10a-46fd-8c41-7ee61c685053.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T06:53:58.217Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 4bc7fb9fc4c5913fc71eb8e71431c6ba722e3e45703e60a76d1c7ba85cb8c9db. Source text hash: 8032aa62e1a2a8b2051323e0535d8337ec63a66b336574590d494c8cf7420915.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-09T06:53:58.217Z
arXiv cs.AI: Transforming Integer Grids to Spatial Intuition: Perception, Not Planning, Governs ARC-AGI-3
Harsidak Singh Banwait argues that ARC-AGI-3 performance depends more on perceiving spatial structure than on planning. The paper presents SARBLOH, an agent that converts each game frame into an object inventory, a geometric briefing distinguishing proven invariants from affordance hypotheses, and an annotated canvas. Banwait’s account is that raw integer grids obscure spatial relationships, leading models to spend actions rediscovering boundaries and symmetries; SARBLOH instead uses a code-as-action runtime to express algorithmic hypotheses. In the paper’s experiments, grounded perception raises a rubric score from 3/28 to 25/28 and cuts token use by 89.4%. The reported results also draw a boundary: geometric invariants generalized with 100% accuracy on 23 held-out games, but single-frame affordance guesses reached only 6–50%, so active verification probes remain necessary. On the public set, briefing-on Run B reached 63.5% single-pass efficiency, compared with 59.4% for briefing-off Run A. Within a nine-hour budget on one Kaggle RTX PRO 6000 , SARBLOH scored 16.53 on the hidden Kaggle evaluation. As an Escape Meridian interpretation, these results support Banwait’s case for better perception in this ; the abstract does not establish how well the approach transfers beyond ARC-AGI-3.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 4, 2026 (2026-11-04).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T06:53:58.217Z. First observed: 2026-11-05T05:03:30.851Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T06:53:09.825Z.
Limits
The evidence is the abstract, not the full paper; experimental setup and evaluation details beyond the abstract are not available here. The abstract reports ARC-AGI-3 results and does not establish transfer to other interactive environments. The abstract reports strong generalization for geometric invariants but much lower accuracy for single-frame affordance guesses, and says active verification probes remain necessary.
Open question
How would SARBLOH’s reported results change on interactive environments beyond ARC-AGI-3?
Source-stated
Banwait argues that spatial perception, rather than planning capacity, governs interactive reasoning on ARC-AGI-3.
SARBLOH, an open-weight agent built on the premise that spatial perception, not planning capacity, governs interactive reasoning on ARC-AGI-3.
Source-stated
The agent turns each frame into an object inventory, a geometric briefing, and an annotated canvas, then uses a code-as-action runtime to express algorithmic hypotheses.
A zero-parameter O(HW) perception engine turns each frame, in 35 ms, into an object inventory with bipartite temporal tracking, a geometric briefing that separates proven invariants from affordance hypotheses, and an annotated canvas.
Source-stated
The paper reports that grounded perception raised the rubric score from 3/28 to 25/28 while reducing token use by 89.4%.
Across eight presentations, grounded perception raises the rubric score from 3/28 to 25/28 points while cutting token use by 89.4%.
Source-stated
On 23 held-out games, geometric invariants generalized with 100% accuracy, while single-frame affordance guesses ranged from 6% to 50%; the author says active verification probes remain necessary.
On 23 held-out games, geometric invariants generalize with 100% accuracy, while single-frame affordance guesses fall to 6-50%, so active verification probes remain necessary.
Source-stated
On the public set, briefing-on Run B reached 63.5% single-pass efficiency; briefing-off Run A reached 59.4%.
Run A (briefing off) solved 143 of 183 levels in 8.2 hours at 59.4% single-pass efficiency; Run B (briefing on) reached 63.5%.
Source-stated
Within a nine-hour budget on one Kaggle RTX PRO 6000 GPU, SARBLOH scored 16.53 on the hidden Kaggle evaluation.
Within the nine-hour budget on one Kaggle RTX PRO 6000 GPU, SARBLOH scored 16.53 on the hidden Kaggle evaluation, 13.7x the first Milestone winner.
Escape Meridian interpretation
The reported benchmark results support Banwait’s argument about ARC-AGI-3, but the abstract does not report results on other interactive environments.
SARBLOH scored 16.53 on the hidden Kaggle evaluation
Source and contributor context
Banwait, Harsidak Singh · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Open weights
A model whose trained numbers are published so others can download, run and inspect it; the license and training data may still be restricted.
Graphics processing unit
A chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: ae82ee90-f10a-46fd-8c41-7ee61c685053.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T06:53:58.217Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 4bc7fb9fc4c5913fc71eb8e71431c6ba722e3e45703e60a76d1c7ba85cb8c9db. Source text hash: 8032aa62e1a2a8b2051323e0535d8337ec63a66b336574590d494c8cf7420915.
uncertain · 2026-11-09T06:53:58.217Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: ae82ee90-f10a-46fd-8c41-7ee61c685053
attribution — pass: The draft attributes the argument and results to Harsidak Singh Banwait, the sole listed author. It keeps the claims framed as the paper's own: 'argues', 'Banwait's account', 'the paper's experiments'. The interpretive sentence is labeled as Escape Meridian interpretation.
Authors:Harsidak Singh Banwait
summary — uncertain: The central benchmark, ARC-AGI-3, is never explained. The abstract describes it as uninstructed visual games scored by Relative Human Action Efficiency, which quadratically penalizes wasted exploratory actions. Without that context, readers cannot see why fewer rediscovery actions matter or what the 63.5% efficiency and 16.53 score measure. The score of 16.53 also appears without the abstract's comparison point, 13.7x the first Milestone winner. Minimal repair: add one plain sentence defining ARC-AGI-3 and its action-efficiency scoring, and restore the 13.7x comparison. Smaller point: 'obscure' softens the source's 'serialization destroys spatial topology'.
ARC-AGI-3 tests this across uninstructed visual games scored by Relative Human Action Efficiency, which penalizes exploratory waste quadratically.
date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-11-04. This matches the arXiv v1 submission date, Wed, 4 Nov 2026. It is not the later feed date.
[Submitted on 4 Nov 2026]
support — pass: The numerical claims are stated in the abstract: 3/28 to 25/28, 89.4%, 100% vs 6-50%, 59.4% vs 63.5%, and 16.53 on one RTX PRO 6000 within nine hours. The limitation about active verification probes is preserved. The EM interpretation is labeled and conditional. It limits support to this benchmark and correctly notes that the abstract shows no transfer beyond ARC-AGI-3. The question follows from that gap and is not leading.
Across eight presentations, grounded perception raises the rubric score from 3/28 to 25/28 points while cutting token use by 89.4%.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the original source. No better source media was found.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A model whose trained numbers are published so others can download, run and inspect it; the license and training data may still be restricted.
Definition referenceA chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA model whose trained numbers are published so others can download, run and inspect it; the license and training data may still be restricted.
Definition referenceA chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv