Michelucci, Umberto · Oct 13, 2026
arXiv cs.AI: Umberto Michelucci’s practical introduction to large language models
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Umberto Michelucci presents his book as a practical, accessible introduction to (LLMs) for scientists and professionals, written as a basis for a lecture in a master’s program in artificial intelligence in medicine. He says it explains tokenisation, , training, inference, , prompting and instruction hierarchies while avoiding mathematical detail. Its focus is not only how to use LLMs, but how to judge their outputs: the book addresses , uncertainty, reproducibility and bias, and the need for systematic verification and human oversight. It also covers privacy, governance and security, alongside advanced topics such as (RAG), agents and workflows. A practical exercise has readers run a local LLM with Ollama and Open WebUI to interact with scientific papers. The exercise emphasizes evidence retrieval, source verification, uncertainty, disagreement between studies, and the difference between plausible language and scientifically supported conclusions. The abstract says no programming knowledge is required. It describes the book’s intended contents and exercise, but does not report how readers used them or what they learned.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Oct 13, 2026 (2026-10-13).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T04:22:54.874Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:42:59.797Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T09:01:28.576Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The available evidence is the page text and abstract; it does not include the book’s full text. The abstract describes the exercise but gives no results showing how readers performed or whether the exercise improved their ability to evaluate outputs.
Open question
How is the practical exercise designed to address the distinction between plausible -generated language and conclusions supported by scientific evidence?
Source-stated
Michelucci says he wrote the document as a basis for a lecture in a master’s program in artificial intelligence in medicine at the University of Turin.
I wrote this document as a basis for my lecture on LLM in the master in artificial intelligence in medicine at the university of Turin, Italy.
Source-stated
The book introduces core LLM concepts for scientists and professionals while deliberately avoiding mathematical detail.
This book provides a practical and accessible introduction to LLMs for scientists and professionals. It explains the fundamental ideas behind tokenisation, embeddings, training, inference, context windows, prompting, and instruction hierarchies, while deliberately avoiding mathematical detail.
Source-stated
Michelucci says the book addresses limitations of LLM-generated answers and the need for verification and human oversight.
Particular attention is given to the limitations of LLM-generated answers, including hallucinations, uncertainty, reproducibility, bias, and the need for systematic verification and human oversight.
Source-stated
The practical exercise uses a local LLM with scientific papers and emphasizes evidence retrieval, source verification, uncertainty and disagreement between studies.
A substantial practical exercise guides the reader through running a local LLM with Ollama and Open WebUI and using it to interact with a collection of scientific papers.
Escape Meridian interpretation
The abstract describes the book’s contents and exercise but reports no results from readers using them.
A substantial practical exercise guides the reader through running a local LLM with Ollama and Open WebUI
Source and contributor context
Michelucci, Umberto · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Embedding vector
A list of numbers that represents a piece of text, an image or another item so software can compare meanings.
Context window
How much text a model can take in and consider at one time.
Hallucination
When an AI system states something false or made up as if it were true.
Retrieval-augmented generation
A setup in which a model first looks up relevant documents and then answers using them.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: b91902f9-91e5-40fe-85c2-e4473331caca.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T04:22:54.874Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: useful_perspective.
Observation: c2fab48f4be0d942d421187b11a64868d7e3081f09258c8c06f7a3d7995ee464. Source text hash: 94479e7ca48a45e25ebcbe1ee05ee5c4138c74854b7614ca38aa204b14e9727f.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-11T04:22:54.874Z
arXiv cs.AI: Umberto Michelucci’s practical introduction to large language models
Umberto Michelucci presents his book as a practical, accessible introduction to (LLMs) for scientists and professionals, written as a basis for a lecture in a master’s program in artificial intelligence in medicine. He says it explains tokenisation, , training, inference, , prompting and instruction hierarchies while avoiding mathematical detail. Its focus is not only how to use LLMs, but how to judge their outputs: the book addresses , uncertainty, reproducibility and bias, and the need for systematic verification and human oversight. It also covers privacy, governance and security, alongside advanced topics such as (RAG), agents and workflows. A practical exercise has readers run a local LLM with Ollama and Open WebUI to interact with scientific papers. The exercise emphasizes evidence retrieval, source verification, uncertainty, disagreement between studies, and the difference between plausible language and scientifically supported conclusions. The abstract says no programming knowledge is required. It describes the book’s intended contents and exercise, but does not report how readers used them or what they learned.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Oct 13, 2026 (2026-10-13).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T04:22:54.874Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:42:59.797Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T09:01:28.576Z.
Limits
The available evidence is the page text and abstract; it does not include the book’s full text. The abstract describes the exercise but gives no results showing how readers performed or whether the exercise improved their ability to evaluate outputs.
Open question
How is the practical exercise designed to address the distinction between plausible -generated language and conclusions supported by scientific evidence?
Source-stated
Michelucci says he wrote the document as a basis for a lecture in a master’s program in artificial intelligence in medicine at the University of Turin.
I wrote this document as a basis for my lecture on LLM in the master in artificial intelligence in medicine at the university of Turin, Italy.
Source-stated
The book introduces core LLM concepts for scientists and professionals while deliberately avoiding mathematical detail.
This book provides a practical and accessible introduction to LLMs for scientists and professionals. It explains the fundamental ideas behind tokenisation, embeddings, training, inference, context windows, prompting, and instruction hierarchies, while deliberately avoiding mathematical detail.
Source-stated
Michelucci says the book addresses limitations of LLM-generated answers and the need for verification and human oversight.
Particular attention is given to the limitations of LLM-generated answers, including hallucinations, uncertainty, reproducibility, bias, and the need for systematic verification and human oversight.
Source-stated
The practical exercise uses a local LLM with scientific papers and emphasizes evidence retrieval, source verification, uncertainty and disagreement between studies.
A substantial practical exercise guides the reader through running a local LLM with Ollama and Open WebUI and using it to interact with a collection of scientific papers.
Escape Meridian interpretation
The abstract describes the book’s contents and exercise but reports no results from readers using them.
A substantial practical exercise guides the reader through running a local LLM with Ollama and Open WebUI
Source and contributor context
Michelucci, Umberto · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Embedding vector
A list of numbers that represents a piece of text, an image or another item so software can compare meanings.
Context window
How much text a model can take in and consider at one time.
Hallucination
When an AI system states something false or made up as if it were true.
Retrieval-augmented generation
A setup in which a model first looks up relevant documents and then answers using them.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: b91902f9-91e5-40fe-85c2-e4473331caca.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T04:22:54.874Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: useful_perspective.
Observation: c2fab48f4be0d942d421187b11a64868d7e3081f09258c8c06f7a3d7995ee464. Source text hash: 94479e7ca48a45e25ebcbe1ee05ee5c4138c74854b7614ca38aa204b14e9727f.
passed · 2026-11-11T04:22:54.874Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: b91902f9-91e5-40fe-85c2-e4473331caca
attribution — pass: The reading correctly attributes the book and its stated purpose to its sole author, Umberto Michelucci, and frames contents as his description. The arXiv cs.AI label matches the publisher metadata; the paper is primarily cs.CL and cross-listed in cs.AI.
Authors:Umberto Michelucci
summary — pass: A general reader can follow the summary: it is an accessible LLM introduction for scientists and professionals, with emphasis on judging outputs, verification and human oversight. Terms such as embeddings, RAG and Ollama appear as listed contents, not central claims, and tooltips can cover them. The question follows from the source, and the closing caveat accurately notes that no reader outcomes are reported.
the distinction between plausible language and scientifically supported conclusions
date — pass: originalPublished 2026-10-13 matches the v1 submission date on arXiv, not the later feed date of 2026-10-31.
[Submitted on 13 Oct 2026]
support — pass: Each claim is grounded in the abstract. The interpretation that the abstract reports no reader results is a fair, limited inference. The reading implies no unsupported benefits, and the limitations correctly note that the evidence is abstract-only.
Particular attention is given to the limitations of LLM-generated answers, including hallucinations, uncertainty, reproducibility, bias, and the need for systematic verification and human oversight.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct access to the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceA list of numbers that represents a piece of text, an image or another item so software can compare meanings.
Definition referenceHow much text a model can take in and consider at one time.
Definition referenceWhen an AI system states something false or made up as if it were true.
Definition referenceA setup in which a model first looks up relevant documents and then answers using them.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceA list of numbers that represents a piece of text, an image or another item so software can compare meanings.
Definition referenceHow much text a model can take in and consider at one time.
Definition referenceWhen an AI system states something false or made up as if it were true.
Definition referenceA setup in which a model first looks up relevant documents and then answers using them.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition reference