Han, Weijia, Huang, Zhi, Qu, Lisha, Tan, Yuanyuan, Meng, Jiayue · Oct 30, 2026
arXiv eess.SY paper proposes quantile propagation planning for budgeted tail-risk evaluation
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Weijia Han, Zhi Huang, Lisha Qu, Yuanyuan Tan and Jiayue Meng introduce quantile propagation planning (QPP), a way to evaluate mean and tail risk when a planner has only a limited number of . They argue that Monte Carlo rollouts can spend that budget on noisy tail estimates, while planning from the mean can miss rare, costly outcomes. QPP instead propagates a small, fixed set of disturbance quantiles through the dynamics and integrates the resulting cost curve. The authors say the method is exact at those propagated levels, converges as the quantile grid is refined, and has a one-sided conservatism guarantee under stated structural conditions. In controlled overload and inventory tasks, the authors report that QPP reduces realized tail cost and constraint violations compared with mean-rollout planning. On overload, they say it remains competitive with sampled evaluators using substantially more trajectories. The authors present QPP as a transparent, budget-controlled approach to tail-risk evaluation. The supplied abstract does not establish how these results transfer beyond the tested tasks; the conservatism guarantee is also conditional on structural assumptions.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
eess.SY · Article
Source details
Original source date: Oct 30, 2026 (2026-10-30).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T00:22:47.466Z. First observed: 2026-11-02T05:06:28.677Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-02T10:17:21.166Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the abstract, not the paper's methods, results tables, or appendices; the reported comparisons cannot be examined in detail here. The conservatism guarantee applies under structural conditions, which the abstract does not specify. The reported evaluations are in controlled overload and inventory tasks; the abstract does not report performance in other settings.
Open question
How does QPP perform on tasks beyond the controlled overload and inventory settings?
Source-stated
The authors introduce QPP to evaluate mean and tail risk using a limited number of model evaluations.
We introduce quantile propagation planning (QPP), which propagates a small, fixed set of disturbance quantiles through the dynamics and integrates the resulting cost curve to evaluate both mean and tail risk.
Source-stated
The authors contrast QPP with Monte Carlo rollouts and planning from the mean, describing limitations of both for tail-risk evaluation.
Monte Carlo rollouts spend this budget on noisy tail estimates, while planning from the mean can miss the tail entirely.
Source-stated
The authors state that QPP is exact at the propagated levels, converges with a refined quantile grid, and has a conditional one-sided conservatism guarantee.
The method is exact at the propagated levels, converges as the quantile grid is refined, and admits a one-sided conservatism guarantee under stated structural conditions.
Source-stated
In controlled overload and inventory tasks, the authors report lower realized tail cost and fewer constraint violations than mean-rollout planning.
In controlled overload and inventory tasks, QPP reduces realized tail cost and constraint violations relative to mean-rollout planning.
Source-stated
For overload, the authors say QPP remains competitive with sampled evaluators using substantially more trajectories.
On overload, it remains competitive with sampled evaluators that use substantially more trajectories.
Source and contributor context
Han, Weijia, Huang, Zhi, Qu, Lisha, Tan, Yuanyuan, Meng, Jiayue · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Evals
Structured tests of what an AI system can do or how it behaves, run before or after release.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 3fe858fd-a9f4-4bc4-80ac-4b23c9e0aded.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T00:22:47.466Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 26bd42617e0c75bc9b5d60f5792747f7d89cfa20909230ca76133c30f1130de8. Source text hash: 8af90e83103e247db863bc4fcbaac41799c8a6f2d61eddd99746a6f38222fc3c.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-11T00:22:47.466Z
arXiv eess.SY paper proposes quantile propagation planning for budgeted tail-risk evaluation
Weijia Han, Zhi Huang, Lisha Qu, Yuanyuan Tan and Jiayue Meng introduce quantile propagation planning (QPP), a way to evaluate mean and tail risk when a planner has only a limited number of . They argue that Monte Carlo rollouts can spend that budget on noisy tail estimates, while planning from the mean can miss rare, costly outcomes. QPP instead propagates a small, fixed set of disturbance quantiles through the dynamics and integrates the resulting cost curve. The authors say the method is exact at those propagated levels, converges as the quantile grid is refined, and has a one-sided conservatism guarantee under stated structural conditions. In controlled overload and inventory tasks, the authors report that QPP reduces realized tail cost and constraint violations compared with mean-rollout planning. On overload, they say it remains competitive with sampled evaluators using substantially more trajectories. The authors present QPP as a transparent, budget-controlled approach to tail-risk evaluation. The supplied abstract does not establish how these results transfer beyond the tested tasks; the conservatism guarantee is also conditional on structural assumptions.
Original source
eess.SY · Article
Source details
Original source date: Oct 30, 2026 (2026-10-30).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T00:22:47.466Z. First observed: 2026-11-02T05:06:28.677Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-02T10:17:21.166Z.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the abstract, not the paper's methods, results tables, or appendices; the reported comparisons cannot be examined in detail here. The conservatism guarantee applies under structural conditions, which the abstract does not specify. The reported evaluations are in controlled overload and inventory tasks; the abstract does not report performance in other settings.
Open question
How does QPP perform on tasks beyond the controlled overload and inventory settings?
Source-stated
The authors introduce QPP to evaluate mean and tail risk using a limited number of model evaluations.
We introduce quantile propagation planning (QPP), which propagates a small, fixed set of disturbance quantiles through the dynamics and integrates the resulting cost curve to evaluate both mean and tail risk.
Source-stated
The authors contrast QPP with Monte Carlo rollouts and planning from the mean, describing limitations of both for tail-risk evaluation.
Monte Carlo rollouts spend this budget on noisy tail estimates, while planning from the mean can miss the tail entirely.
Source-stated
The authors state that QPP is exact at the propagated levels, converges with a refined quantile grid, and has a conditional one-sided conservatism guarantee.
The method is exact at the propagated levels, converges as the quantile grid is refined, and admits a one-sided conservatism guarantee under stated structural conditions.
Source-stated
In controlled overload and inventory tasks, the authors report lower realized tail cost and fewer constraint violations than mean-rollout planning.
In controlled overload and inventory tasks, QPP reduces realized tail cost and constraint violations relative to mean-rollout planning.
Source-stated
For overload, the authors say QPP remains competitive with sampled evaluators using substantially more trajectories.
On overload, it remains competitive with sampled evaluators that use substantially more trajectories.
Source and contributor context
Han, Weijia, Huang, Zhi, Qu, Lisha, Tan, Yuanyuan, Meng, Jiayue · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Evals
Structured tests of what an AI system can do or how it behaves, run before or after release.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 3fe858fd-a9f4-4bc4-80ac-4b23c9e0aded.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T00:22:47.466Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 26bd42617e0c75bc9b5d60f5792747f7d89cfa20909230ca76133c30f1130de8. Source text hash: 8af90e83103e247db863bc4fcbaac41799c8a6f2d61eddd99746a6f38222fc3c.
uncertain · 2026-11-11T00:22:47.466Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 3fe858fd-a9f4-4bc4-80ac-4b23c9e0aded
attribution — pass: The draft attributes the method and all results to the five listed authors and frames claims as theirs ('they argue', 'the authors report'). The title's 'arXiv eess.SY paper' label is acceptable because the paper is cross-listed in eess.SY, although its primary listing is cs.LG.
Authors:Weijia Han, Zhi Huang, Lisha Qu, Yuanyuan Tan, Jiayue Meng
summary — uncertain: The draft faithfully mirrors the abstract, but a non-specialist cannot follow its central terms. 'Tail risk', 'Monte Carlo rollouts', 'disturbance quantiles', 'propagates through the dynamics', 'one-sided conservatism guarantee' and 'constraint violations' are never explained in plain language. The draft also does not say what 'overload' and 'inventory' tasks represent, or why budget-limited detection of rare, costly outcomes matters. Smallest repair: add brief plain-language glosses or term-library tooltips for these terms, plus one source-grounded sentence on why spotting rare, costly outcomes with few evaluations matters.
Risk-aware planning must identify rare, costly outcomes using only a limited number of model evaluations.
date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-10-30 matches the v1 submission date on arXiv. The later feed date of 2026-11-02 is correctly not used.
[v1] Fri, 30 Oct 2026 07:07:35 UTC (656 KB)
support — pass: Each claim is directly stated in the abstract and attributed to the authors. The conditional guarantee and the limited task scope are preserved. The question about performance beyond the tested tasks follows from the evidence without assuming an answer, and no unsupported benefits are implied.
On overload, it remains competitive with sampled evaluators that use substantially more trajectories.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page, which is the direct original source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
Structured tests of what an AI system can do or how it behaves, run before or after release.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivStructured tests of what an AI system can do or how it behaves, run before or after release.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivarXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv