Skip to content
Escape
Meridian

The future is still open.

Regev, Shaked, Brody, Evan J. R. · Oct 29, 2026

arXiv: Fast and Accurate Hydro Unit Commitment

Markdown · JSON · Original source

Authors Shaked Regev and Evan J. R. Brody introduce a greedy-heuristic for committing hydro-generators: deciding when generators should operate. They report that their algorithm handles 56 generators over 200 days 10,000 times faster than Hexaly, a commercial solver, without sacrificing solution quality. They also report handling 1792 generators for a year in approximately 20 seconds on commodity hardware, a problem size Hexaly cannot solve in reasonable . The authors say their solver’s runtime scales log-linearly with the number of generators and time periods. They offer a direction toward a possible proof that its error decreases as problem size grows, and say experimental results support that direction. The abstract does not provide experiment details or hardware specifications needed to assess those comparisons independently.

Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.

arXiv eess.SYArticle · arxiv.orgOpen original source

Original source

eess.SY · Article

Source details

Original source date: Oct 29, 2026 (2026-10-29).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T11:48:02.105Z. First observed: 2026-11-02T05:06:39.841Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-02T07:02:18.132Z.

Referenced by

Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.

No public references recorded here yet.

Reference data (JSON)

Limits

The supplied evidence is the abstract, which gives no details of the experiments supporting the claim that error decreases with problem size. The abstract does not specify the commodity hardware or provide further details for evaluating the reported runtime comparisons.

Open question

What experimental results support the authors’ claim that solver error decreases as problem size grows?

Source-stated

The authors introduce a greedy-heuristic tailored for committing hydro-generators.

We attain this runtime improvement by introducing a greedy-heuristic tailored for hydro units.

Source-stated

The authors report that their algorithm commits 56 generators for 200 days 10,000 times faster than Hexaly without sacrificing solution quality.

commit 56 generators for 200 days 10,000 times faster than Hexaly, the leading commercial solver for scheduling problems, without sacrificing solution quality.

Source-stated

The authors report that their method commits 1792 generators for a year in approximately 20 seconds on commodity hardware; they say Hexaly cannot solve problems of this size in reasonable time.

Our method can commit 1792 generators for an entire year in approximately 20 seconds on commodity hardware. Hexaly is unable to solve problems of this size in reasonable time.

Source-stated

The authors say they prove that runtime scales log-linearly in the number of generators and time periods.

We prove that our solver's runtime scales log-linearly in the number of generators and time periods.

Source-stated

The authors present a direction toward a possible proof that solver error decreases with problem size, supported by experimental results.

We provide a direction for a possible proof that the error our solver makes decreases with the problem size. This is supported by our experimental results.

Source and contributor context

Regev, Shaked, Brody, Evan J. R. · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.

Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

TIME

TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 1b84c89a-1ca5-4bbf-8238-39e78b550061.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T11:48:02.105Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.

Observation: 859ff359ff61d27a2adc369511ccdd452fcc69cd9475894676a9113f5de73d0b. Source text hash: 5bf2daf0342e3d6fd98957d230dda913f20a1f050711ef455ffea8816fc42733.

Revision and source-check history

Version 1 · 2026-11-10T11:48:02.105Z

arXiv: Fast and Accurate Hydro Unit Commitment

Authors Shaked Regev and Evan J. R. Brody introduce a greedy-heuristic for committing hydro-generators: deciding when generators should operate. They report that their algorithm handles 56 generators over 200 days 10,000 times faster than Hexaly, a commercial solver, without sacrificing solution quality. They also report handling 1792 generators for a year in approximately 20 seconds on commodity hardware, a problem size Hexaly cannot solve in reasonable . The authors say their solver’s runtime scales log-linearly with the number of generators and time periods. They offer a direction toward a possible proof that its error decreases as problem size grows, and say experimental results support that direction. The abstract does not provide experiment details or hardware specifications needed to assess those comparisons independently.

Original source

eess.SY · Article

Source details

Original source date: Oct 29, 2026 (2026-10-29).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T11:48:02.105Z. First observed: 2026-11-02T05:06:39.841Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-02T07:02:18.132Z.

Limits

The supplied evidence is the abstract, which gives no details of the experiments supporting the claim that error decreases with problem size. The abstract does not specify the commodity hardware or provide further details for evaluating the reported runtime comparisons.

Open question

What experimental results support the authors’ claim that solver error decreases as problem size grows?

Source-stated

The authors introduce a greedy-heuristic tailored for committing hydro-generators.

We attain this runtime improvement by introducing a greedy-heuristic tailored for hydro units.

Source-stated

The authors report that their algorithm commits 56 generators for 200 days 10,000 times faster than Hexaly without sacrificing solution quality.

commit 56 generators for 200 days 10,000 times faster than Hexaly, the leading commercial solver for scheduling problems, without sacrificing solution quality.

Source-stated

The authors report that their method commits 1792 generators for a year in approximately 20 seconds on commodity hardware; they say Hexaly cannot solve problems of this size in reasonable time.

Our method can commit 1792 generators for an entire year in approximately 20 seconds on commodity hardware. Hexaly is unable to solve problems of this size in reasonable time.

Source-stated

The authors say they prove that runtime scales log-linearly in the number of generators and time periods.

We prove that our solver's runtime scales log-linearly in the number of generators and time periods.

Source-stated

The authors present a direction toward a possible proof that solver error decreases with problem size, supported by experimental results.

We provide a direction for a possible proof that the error our solver makes decreases with the problem size. This is supported by our experimental results.

Source and contributor context

Regev, Shaked, Brody, Evan J. R. · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.

Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

TIME

TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 1b84c89a-1ca5-4bbf-8238-39e78b550061.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T11:48:02.105Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.

Observation: 859ff359ff61d27a2adc369511ccdd452fcc69cd9475894676a9113f5de73d0b. Source text hash: 5bf2daf0342e3d6fd98957d230dda913f20a1f050711ef455ffea8816fc42733.

passed · 2026-11-10T11:48:02.105Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Publication: 1b84c89a-1ca5-4bbf-8238-39e78b550061

attribution — pass: The reading correctly attributes the work to Shaked Regev and Evan J. R. Brody, and each performance and proof claim is framed as reported by the authors rather than as established fact.

Authors:Shaked Regev, Evan J. R. Brody

summary — pass: The summary accurately conveys the abstract and explains unit commitment in plain terms. Greedy-heuristic and log-linearly are kept exactly and can be explained through term tooltips. One minor point: the summary says the authors 'say' runtime scales log-linearly, while the source says they 'prove' it. The claims list preserves the word prove. The question is a substantive open issue that follows from the abstract's limited evidence.

We prove that our solver's runtime scales log-linearly in the number of generators and time periods.

date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-10-29 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. It is not the later feed date of 2026-11-02.

[Submitted on 29 Oct 2026]

support — pass: All claims match the abstract verbatim and keep their conditions: 10,000 times faster without sacrificing solution quality, about 20 seconds on commodity hardware, and only a direction toward a possible proof of decreasing error. The draft adds no unsupported benefits, costs or stakes, and its stated limitations are accurate.

We provide a direction for a possible proof that the error our solver makes decreases with the problem size. This is supported by our experimental results.

media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page, which matches the source URL. No better source media was found.

Challenge or correct this reading

Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.