Sepidband, Melika, Shin, Jiho, Wang, Song, Hemmati, Hadi · Nov 5, 2026
arXiv: How Should Agents See Code? Rethinking Code Representations for Agentic Software Engineering
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Authors Melika Sepidband, Jiho Shin, Song Wang and Hadi Hemmati argue that the way an agent views a code repository can change what it finds and how much it costs in tokens and . They compare five map-based code-representation workflows—abstract syntax trees, call graphs, module dependencies, documentation-enriched search, and a hybrid—with a raw-tool baseline. The study evaluates Code with Haiku 4.5 on four repository-level tasks. The results vary by task, rather than making a general case for replacing raw tools. On LinuxFLBench, all five workflows improve recall@10 and reduce token usage; on SWE-bench Pro, resolution stays close to the baseline while token use falls. Callgraph has the highest patch-resolution rate in this SecBench sample, but all workflows increase . On SWT-bench, Hybrid and Docs have the highest reproducing-test rates in the sample, while all workflows use more tokens and take longer. The authors’ distinction is that repository maps help most when finding relevant code is the bottleneck; gains narrow when the decisive work is writing a patch or test. For people building or using coding agents, the paper presents repository representation as a task-dependent design choice: token savings may come with more time or limited success gains. The reported results concern one agent configuration and four tasks.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T19:18:48.776Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:53.505Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T19:17:58.934Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The reported evaluation uses Code with Haiku 4.5 and four repository-level tasks; the evidence here does not establish how results would generalize to other agents or tasks.
Open question
How would these results change with other agents or repository-level tasks?
Source-stated
The authors compare five map-based code-representation workflows with a raw-tool baseline, using Claude Code with Haiku 4.5 on four repository-level tasks.
We evaluate Claude Code with Haiku 4.5 against a raw-tool baseline on four repository-level tasks:
Source-stated
On LinuxFLBench, each workflow improves recall@10 over the baseline and reduces token usage by 25–39%.
On LinuxFLBench, all five workflows improve recall@10 over the baseline (0.757-0.829 vs. 0.717) and reduce token usage by 25-39%.
Source-stated
On SWE-bench Pro, resolution stays close to the baseline while token usage falls.
On SWE-bench Pro, resolution remains close to the baseline (44.3-50.6% vs. 49.0%) while token usage drops by 17-26%.
Source-stated
On SecBench, Callgraph has the highest patch-resolution rate in this sample and uses fewer tokens, but every workflow increases latency.
On SecBench, Callgraph has the highest patch-resolution rate in this sample (34.3% vs. 28.9%) and uses fewer tokens, but all workflows increase latency.
Source-stated
On SWT-bench, Hybrid and Docs have the highest reproducing-test rates in this sample, but every workflow uses more tokens and takes longer.
On SWT-bench, Hybrid and Docs have the highest reproducing-test rates in this sample (47.8% and 47.2% vs. 44.7%), but all workflows use more tokens and take longer.
Source-stated
The authors conclude that the benefits of map-based workflows depend on the task rather than applying universally.
Overall, map-based workflows change both what the agent inspects and how much it spends, but their benefits are task-dependent rather than universal.
Source and contributor context
Sepidband, Melika, Shin, Jiho, Wang, Song, Hemmati, Hadi · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Agentic AI
AI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Latency
The delay between sending a request and receiving the result.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
TIME
TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Claude
Claude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 2e192e94-b686-435f-8883-b5f491629d7d.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T19:18:48.776Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 191dd09dc0d516c28b0596fc0fd5eb0e72e9658ff4b840fa03f06f6543e1464a. Source text hash: 0ba5fcdb03cdd0476874965675841a91b478c57fd4ec59648c8468b630e4080d.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-08T19:18:48.776Z
arXiv: How Should Agents See Code? Rethinking Code Representations for Agentic Software Engineering
Authors Melika Sepidband, Jiho Shin, Song Wang and Hadi Hemmati argue that the way an agent views a code repository can change what it finds and how much it costs in tokens and . They compare five map-based code-representation workflows—abstract syntax trees, call graphs, module dependencies, documentation-enriched search, and a hybrid—with a raw-tool baseline. The study evaluates Code with Haiku 4.5 on four repository-level tasks. The results vary by task, rather than making a general case for replacing raw tools. On LinuxFLBench, all five workflows improve recall@10 and reduce token usage; on SWE-bench Pro, resolution stays close to the baseline while token use falls. Callgraph has the highest patch-resolution rate in this SecBench sample, but all workflows increase . On SWT-bench, Hybrid and Docs have the highest reproducing-test rates in the sample, while all workflows use more tokens and take longer. The authors’ distinction is that repository maps help most when finding relevant code is the bottleneck; gains narrow when the decisive work is writing a patch or test. For people building or using coding agents, the paper presents repository representation as a task-dependent design choice: token savings may come with more time or limited success gains. The reported results concern one agent configuration and four tasks.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 5, 2026 (2026-11-05).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T19:18:48.776Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:53.505Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T19:17:58.934Z.
Limits
The reported evaluation uses Code with Haiku 4.5 and four repository-level tasks; the evidence here does not establish how results would generalize to other agents or tasks.
Open question
How would these results change with other agents or repository-level tasks?
Source-stated
The authors compare five map-based code-representation workflows with a raw-tool baseline, using Claude Code with Haiku 4.5 on four repository-level tasks.
We evaluate Claude Code with Haiku 4.5 against a raw-tool baseline on four repository-level tasks:
Source-stated
On LinuxFLBench, each workflow improves recall@10 over the baseline and reduces token usage by 25–39%.
On LinuxFLBench, all five workflows improve recall@10 over the baseline (0.757-0.829 vs. 0.717) and reduce token usage by 25-39%.
Source-stated
On SWE-bench Pro, resolution stays close to the baseline while token usage falls.
On SWE-bench Pro, resolution remains close to the baseline (44.3-50.6% vs. 49.0%) while token usage drops by 17-26%.
Source-stated
On SecBench, Callgraph has the highest patch-resolution rate in this sample and uses fewer tokens, but every workflow increases latency.
On SecBench, Callgraph has the highest patch-resolution rate in this sample (34.3% vs. 28.9%) and uses fewer tokens, but all workflows increase latency.
Source-stated
On SWT-bench, Hybrid and Docs have the highest reproducing-test rates in this sample, but every workflow uses more tokens and takes longer.
On SWT-bench, Hybrid and Docs have the highest reproducing-test rates in this sample (47.8% and 47.2% vs. 44.7%), but all workflows use more tokens and take longer.
Source-stated
The authors conclude that the benefits of map-based workflows depend on the task rather than applying universally.
Overall, map-based workflows change both what the agent inspects and how much it spends, but their benefits are task-dependent rather than universal.
Source and contributor context
Sepidband, Melika, Shin, Jiho, Wang, Song, Hemmati, Hadi · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Agentic AI
AI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Latency
The delay between sending a request and receiving the result.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
TIME
TIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Claude
Claude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 2e192e94-b686-435f-8883-b5f491629d7d.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T19:18:48.776Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 191dd09dc0d516c28b0596fc0fd5eb0e72e9658ff4b840fa03f06f6543e1464a. Source text hash: 0ba5fcdb03cdd0476874965675841a91b478c57fd4ec59648c8468b630e4080d.
passed · 2026-11-08T19:18:48.776Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 2e192e94-b686-435f-8883-b5f491629d7d
attribution — pass: The reading attributes the work to the four listed authors, presents the findings as theirs, and keeps arXiv as the publisher. Comparative results remain framed as the paper's reported results, not established facts.
Authors:Melika Sepidband, Jiho Shin, Song Wang, Hadi Hemmati
summary — pass: The title and summary match the abstract. They lead with the actors and the core idea: repository maps change what an agent finds and how much it spends. The task-by-task results are faithful, and the central finding is stated plainly, so a non-specialist can follow it. Terms such as recall@10 and abstract syntax trees are kept exact and are suitable for tooltips; they are not essential to the main point. The question raises a real open issue that follows from the evidence.
representation workflows are most useful as token-saving tools when localization is the bottleneck, while their success gains narrow when the decisive step is patch or test authoring
date — pass: originalPublished 2026-11-05 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The feed date of 2026-11-06 is correctly not used.
[Submitted on 5 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Every claim matches an exact abstract sentence. The 'in this sample' qualifiers are preserved, and the latency and token caveats are kept. The stated tradeoff, that token savings may come with more time or limited success gains, follows from the reported SecBench, SWT-bench and SWE-bench Pro results. The limitation to one agent configuration and four tasks is accurate and does not overreach.
Overall, map-based workflows change both what the agent inspects and how much it spends, but their benefits are task-dependent rather than universal.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified, direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the original source, and no better source media was found.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceTIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Explore TIMEClaude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding.
Explore ClaudeThe delay between sending a request and receiving the result.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivClaude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding.
Explore ClaudeA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceTIME is a news magazine publishing reporting on world affairs, business, technology and the workers behind digital services.
Explore TIMEClaude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding.
Explore ClaudeThe delay between sending a request and receiving the result.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivClaude is Anthropic’s family of AI models and assistants for tasks such as writing, analysis and coding.
Explore Claude