Skip to content
Escape
Meridian

The future is still open.

Shi, Yunxiao, Xu, Wujiang, Chen, Tingwei, Shang, Haoning, Yang, Ling, Wan, Yunfeng, Cao, Zhuo, Zi, Xing, Metaxas, Dimitris N., Xu, Min · Mar 4, 2026

arXiv paper: AgentSelect benchmark for query-to-agent recommendation

Markdown · JSON · Original source

The authors of AgentSelect argue that choosing an for a particular request is difficult because existing leaderboards and assess components separately and use fragmented tasks, metrics, and candidate pools. They present a benchmark for query-to-agent recommendation: matching a narrative request with an agent configuration that combines a backbone model and a toolkit. The benchmark brings together 111,179 queries, 107,721 deployable agents, and 251,103 interaction records from more than 40 sources. The authors report that recommendation data is concentrated in a long tail of nearly one-off examples, making popularity-based CF/GNN methods fragile and capability-aware matching important. They also report that synthesized compositional interactions can be learned, and that models trained on AgentSelect gain on an unseen public agent , MuleRun. These results make the benchmark a proposed way to study recommendation across a varied agent ecosystem, but the abstract does not establish how well its reported gains carry over to other settings.

Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.

arXiv cs.AIArticle · arxiv.orgOpen original source

Original source

cs.AI · Article

Source details

Original source date: Mar 4, 2026 (2026-03-04).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T21:17:05.469Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:50.424Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T21:16:17.568Z.

Referenced by

Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.

No public references recorded here yet.

Reference data (JSON)

Limits

The evidence provided is the abstract, not the paper's full methods or results; it does not give details that would independently assess the reported performance or transfer gains. The abstract reports results from the authors; those claims are not independently verified by this source page.

Open question

How do the reported gains on MuleRun vary across the unseen catalog, and what evaluation evidence supports their consistency?

Source-stated

The authors frame AgentSelect as addressing a gap in query-conditioned supervision for recommending end-to-end agent configurations.

there is little query-conditioned supervision for learning to recommend end-to-end agent configurations

Source-stated

AgentSelect combines queries, deployable agents, and interaction records aggregated from over 40 sources.

111,179 queries, 107,721 deployable agents, and 251,103 interaction records aggregated from 40+ sources

Source-stated

The authors report that long-tail, near one-off supervision makes popularity-based CF/GNN methods fragile and capability-aware matching essential.

a regime shift from dense head reuse to long-tail, near one-off supervision, where popularity-based CF/GNN methods become fragile and content-aware capability matching is essential

Source-stated

The authors report that models trained on AgentSelect transfer to the public agent marketplace MuleRun, with consistent gains on an unseen catalog.

models trained on AgentSelect also transfer to a public agent marketplace (MuleRun), yielding consistent gains on an unseen catalog

Source and contributor context

Shi, Yunxiao, Xu, Wujiang, Chen, Tingwei, Shang, Haoning, Yang, Ling, Wan, Yunfeng, Cao, Zhuo, Zi, Xing, Metaxas, Dimitris N., Xu, Min · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.

Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

Benchmark

A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.

AI agent

An AI system that chooses and carries out actions toward a goal, often using software tools.

arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

Marketplace

Marketplace is a public radio business news outlet publishing reporting on the economy, companies, technology and work.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 9ac46481-dce2-4edc-8c03-27fe6d25d5cf.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T21:17:05.469Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.

Observation: 170000c695d08d634409fa270f1ec8aab2434d9846801875e124cbd4d8ea5471. Source text hash: ab0c3465e9a1e0bdaadbd5ecdc8875df8a0939f122deb944eeac559d50b66b53.

Revision and source-check history

Version 1 · 2026-11-08T21:17:05.469Z

arXiv paper: AgentSelect benchmark for query-to-agent recommendation

The authors of AgentSelect argue that choosing an for a particular request is difficult because existing leaderboards and assess components separately and use fragmented tasks, metrics, and candidate pools. They present a benchmark for query-to-agent recommendation: matching a narrative request with an agent configuration that combines a backbone model and a toolkit. The benchmark brings together 111,179 queries, 107,721 deployable agents, and 251,103 interaction records from more than 40 sources. The authors report that recommendation data is concentrated in a long tail of nearly one-off examples, making popularity-based CF/GNN methods fragile and capability-aware matching important. They also report that synthesized compositional interactions can be learned, and that models trained on AgentSelect gain on an unseen public agent , MuleRun. These results make the benchmark a proposed way to study recommendation across a varied agent ecosystem, but the abstract does not establish how well its reported gains carry over to other settings.

Original source

cs.AI · Article

Source details

Original source date: Mar 4, 2026 (2026-03-04).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T21:17:05.469Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:50.424Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T21:16:17.568Z.

Limits

The evidence provided is the abstract, not the paper's full methods or results; it does not give details that would independently assess the reported performance or transfer gains. The abstract reports results from the authors; those claims are not independently verified by this source page.

Open question

How do the reported gains on MuleRun vary across the unseen catalog, and what evaluation evidence supports their consistency?

Source-stated

The authors frame AgentSelect as addressing a gap in query-conditioned supervision for recommending end-to-end agent configurations.

there is little query-conditioned supervision for learning to recommend end-to-end agent configurations

Source-stated

AgentSelect combines queries, deployable agents, and interaction records aggregated from over 40 sources.

111,179 queries, 107,721 deployable agents, and 251,103 interaction records aggregated from 40+ sources

Source-stated

The authors report that long-tail, near one-off supervision makes popularity-based CF/GNN methods fragile and capability-aware matching essential.

a regime shift from dense head reuse to long-tail, near one-off supervision, where popularity-based CF/GNN methods become fragile and content-aware capability matching is essential

Source-stated

The authors report that models trained on AgentSelect transfer to the public agent marketplace MuleRun, with consistent gains on an unseen catalog.

models trained on AgentSelect also transfer to a public agent marketplace (MuleRun), yielding consistent gains on an unseen catalog

Source and contributor context

Shi, Yunxiao, Xu, Wujiang, Chen, Tingwei, Shang, Haoning, Yang, Ling, Wan, Yunfeng, Cao, Zhuo, Zi, Xing, Metaxas, Dimitris N., Xu, Min · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.

Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

Benchmark

A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.

AI agent

An AI system that chooses and carries out actions toward a goal, often using software tools.

arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

Marketplace

Marketplace is a public radio business news outlet publishing reporting on the economy, companies, technology and work.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 9ac46481-dce2-4edc-8c03-27fe6d25d5cf.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T21:17:05.469Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.

Observation: 170000c695d08d634409fa270f1ec8aab2434d9846801875e124cbd4d8ea5471. Source text hash: ab0c3465e9a1e0bdaadbd5ecdc8875df8a0939f122deb944eeac559d50b66b53.

uncertain · 2026-11-08T21:17:05.469Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Publication: 9ac46481-dce2-4edc-8c03-27fe6d25d5cf

attribution — pass: The reading attributes the problem framing, benchmark design and results to the AgentSelect authors through an arXiv paper, and keeps the findings as reported claims rather than established facts.

Authors:Yunxiao Shi, Wujiang Xu, Tingwei Chen, Haoning Shang, Ling Yang, Yunfeng Wan, Zhuo Cao, Xing Zi, Dimitris N. Metaxas, Min Xu

summary — uncertain: The summary is mostly faithful, but its central finding uses the jargon 'popularity-based CF/GNN methods' without explaining it for non-specialists. It also changes the source term 'content-aware capability matching' to 'capability-aware matching.' That loses the key contrast with popularity-based methods. Smallest repair: keep the exact source term and add tooltips for CF (collaborative filtering), GNN (graph neural network) and long-tail.

popularity-based CF/GNN methods become fragile and content-aware capability matching is essential

date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-03-04, which matches the v1 submission date. The 5 Nov 2026 date is a later revision, and the feed date is a later announcement.

[Submitted on 4 Mar 2026 (v1), last revised 5 Nov 2026 (this version, v2)]

support — pass: The dataset counts, the gap framing, the long-tail finding, the learnability of synthesized interactions and the MuleRun transfer are all stated in the abstract. The closing caveat and the question about how consistent the gains are do not overreach. They correctly mark what the abstract leaves unshown.

models trained on AgentSelect also transfer to a public agent marketplace (MuleRun), yielding consistent gains on an unseen catalog

media — pass: The selected media is the verified, direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct way to reach the source.

Challenge or correct this reading

Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.