Lei, Shiye, Cheng, Zhihao, Tao, Dacheng · Jan 30, 2026
arXiv paper proposes MinPRO to stabilize off-policy LLM optimization
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Shiye Lei, Zhihao Cheng and Dacheng Tao argue that training with can become unstable when the policy generating training examples differs substantially from the policy being updated. Existing objectives often use token-level importance sampling ratios to correct for that mismatch, but the authors say these do not explicitly correct the shift in prefix distributions. They identify the cumulative prefix importance ratio as the exact correction for the prefix-marginal policy gradient, while noting instability under large policy lag. Their proposed Minimum Prefix Ratio (MinPRO) replaces it with a biased, non-cumulative surrogate based on the minimum token-level ratio in the preceding prefix. In experiments on dense and LLMs across mathematical reasoning , the authors report that MinPRO substantially improves training stability and peak performance in off-policy regimes. The abstract gives no quantitative results or experiment details, so readers cannot assess the size of the reported improvements from this evidence alone.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Jan 30, 2026 (2026-01-30).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T00:38:49.424Z. First observed: 2026-11-05T05:06:25.698Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T00:38:08.617Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the paper's abstract and does not provide quantitative results, experiment details, or the size of the reported improvements. The reported experiments cover mathematical reasoning ; the abstract does not establish how the results generalize to other tasks or deployments.
Open question
How does MinPRO’s reported improvement in training stability and peak performance hold up beyond the mathematical reasoning described in the abstract?
Source-stated
The authors say existing importance-weighted objectives show unstable training dynamics under large policy lag.
we observe unstable training dynamics in existing importance-weighted objectives under large policy lag
Source-stated
The authors identify cumulative prefix importance ratio as the exact correction for the prefix-marginal policy gradient.
the exact correction for the prefix-marginal policy gradient is the cumulative prefix importance ratio
Source-stated
MinPRO uses a biased, non-cumulative surrogate based on the minimum token-level ratio in the preceding prefix.
MinPRO replaces the unstable cumulative prefix ratio with a biased, non-cumulative surrogate based on the minimum token-level ratio observed in the preceding prefix.
Source-stated
The authors report improved training stability and peak performance in off-policy experiments on dense and mixture-of-experts LLMs across mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
Extensive experiments on both dense and mixture-of-experts LLMs, across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks, demonstrate that MinPRO substantially improves training stability and peak performance in off-policy regimes.
Source and contributor context
Lei, Shiye, Cheng, Zhihao, Tao, Dacheng · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Reinforcement learning
Training by trial and error, in which a system is rewarded for the outcomes its designers want.
Mixture of experts
A model design that sends each input to a few specialized sub-networks instead of the whole model, which saves computation.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: ae11457b-fb74-4071-8e07-6b118b49e665.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T00:38:49.424Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 77274d6ca9b2ebe5e8164f0bc34ed2c74fad95f63151f66a02e7c36b678c03ec. Source text hash: 82cf84cc5f2199d809d3f171b029ab0ae19a7c64c4ae3c81d85cf151dd98dc11.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-10T00:38:49.424Z
arXiv paper proposes MinPRO to stabilize off-policy LLM optimization
Shiye Lei, Zhihao Cheng and Dacheng Tao argue that training with can become unstable when the policy generating training examples differs substantially from the policy being updated. Existing objectives often use token-level importance sampling ratios to correct for that mismatch, but the authors say these do not explicitly correct the shift in prefix distributions. They identify the cumulative prefix importance ratio as the exact correction for the prefix-marginal policy gradient, while noting instability under large policy lag. Their proposed Minimum Prefix Ratio (MinPRO) replaces it with a biased, non-cumulative surrogate based on the minimum token-level ratio in the preceding prefix. In experiments on dense and LLMs across mathematical reasoning , the authors report that MinPRO substantially improves training stability and peak performance in off-policy regimes. The abstract gives no quantitative results or experiment details, so readers cannot assess the size of the reported improvements from this evidence alone.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Jan 30, 2026 (2026-01-30).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-10T00:38:49.424Z. First observed: 2026-11-05T05:06:25.698Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T00:38:08.617Z.
Limits
The supplied evidence is the paper's abstract and does not provide quantitative results, experiment details, or the size of the reported improvements. The reported experiments cover mathematical reasoning ; the abstract does not establish how the results generalize to other tasks or deployments.
Open question
How does MinPRO’s reported improvement in training stability and peak performance hold up beyond the mathematical reasoning described in the abstract?
Source-stated
The authors say existing importance-weighted objectives show unstable training dynamics under large policy lag.
we observe unstable training dynamics in existing importance-weighted objectives under large policy lag
Source-stated
The authors identify cumulative prefix importance ratio as the exact correction for the prefix-marginal policy gradient.
the exact correction for the prefix-marginal policy gradient is the cumulative prefix importance ratio
Source-stated
MinPRO uses a biased, non-cumulative surrogate based on the minimum token-level ratio in the preceding prefix.
MinPRO replaces the unstable cumulative prefix ratio with a biased, non-cumulative surrogate based on the minimum token-level ratio observed in the preceding prefix.
Source-stated
The authors report improved training stability and peak performance in off-policy experiments on dense and mixture-of-experts LLMs across mathematical reasoning benchmarks.
Extensive experiments on both dense and mixture-of-experts LLMs, across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks, demonstrate that MinPRO substantially improves training stability and peak performance in off-policy regimes.
Source and contributor context
Lei, Shiye, Cheng, Zhihao, Tao, Dacheng · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Reinforcement learning
Training by trial and error, in which a system is rewarded for the outcomes its designers want.
Mixture of experts
A model design that sends each input to a few specialized sub-networks instead of the whole model, which saves computation.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: ae11457b-fb74-4071-8e07-6b118b49e665.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-10T00:38:49.424Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 77274d6ca9b2ebe5e8164f0bc34ed2c74fad95f63151f66a02e7c36b678c03ec. Source text hash: 82cf84cc5f2199d809d3f171b029ab0ae19a7c64c4ae3c81d85cf151dd98dc11.
uncertain · 2026-11-10T00:38:49.424Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: ae11457b-fb74-4071-8e07-6b118b49e665
attribution — pass: The reading correctly attributes the paper and its claims to Shiye Lei, Zhihao Cheng and Dacheng Tao on arXiv. Results are framed as the authors' report, not as established fact.
Authors:Shiye Lei, Zhihao Cheng, Dacheng Tao
summary — uncertain: The summary is faithful but hard for non-specialists. Central terms such as policy, importance sampling ratio, prefix, prefix-marginal policy gradient, dense and mixture-of-experts are used without plain explanation; tooltips for these terms should be suggested. It also omits the source's reason off-policy rollouts are used, training efficiency, so the stakes are unclear. Smallest repair: add that rollouts are generated with an older policy for training efficiency, briefly gloss prefix as the earlier tokens in a sequence, and optionally note the NeurIPS 2026 acceptance stated on the page.
For training efficiency, rollouts are typically generated in an off-policy manner using an older sampling policy and then used to update the current target policy.
date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-01-30, which matches the v1 submission date. The 4 Nov 2026 revision and the feed date are later events and are correctly not used as the original publication date.
Submitted on 30 Jan 2026 (v1), last revised 4 Nov 2026 (this version, v2)
support — pass: All four claims are supported by verbatim abstract text. The limitations correctly note that the abstract gives no quantitative results and that the experiments are on math benchmarks. Describing the cumulative ratio as unstable is supported by the source's phrase 'unstable cumulative prefix ratio'. The question is open, not leading.
MinPRO replaces the unstable cumulative prefix ratio with a biased, non-cumulative surrogate based on the minimum token-level ratio observed in the preceding prefix.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page, which matches the source URL and is the most direct way to access the paper.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceTraining by trial and error, in which a system is rewarded for the outcomes its designers want.
Definition referenceA model design that sends each input to a few specialized sub-networks instead of the whole model, which saves computation.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceTraining by trial and error, in which a system is rewarded for the outcomes its designers want.
Definition referenceA model design that sends each input to a few specialized sub-networks instead of the whole model, which saves computation.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition reference