Huang, Yiran, Zhang, Zeyong, Rahman, Rounak, Biswal, Bharat, Di, Xin, Xu, Mengjia · Nov 10, 2026
arXiv q-bio.NC authors compare human and machine annotations of brain responses
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Authors Yiran Huang, Zeyong Zhang, Rounak Rahman, Bharat Biswal, Xin Di and Mengjia Xu investigate whether (MLLMs) can provide scalable annotations for naturalistic fMRI. Across three animated movies, they compared machine-generated theory-of-mind (ToM) and valence ratings with human ratings and regional BOLD responses. They report that MLLM ratings partly tracked human judgments, but neural correspondence differed by construct and model: ToM showed the most consistent human--machine overlap in visual cortex, while valence correspondence was largely movie dependent. In an ROI-wise encoding model using data from 66 participants aged 5–22 years and two movies, visual features yielded the strongest and most widespread prediction. Scene descriptions were more spatially selective, concentrated in dorsal-attention and visual regions and extending into right lateral temporal cortex. Age-group comparisons suggested feature-specific differences: scene-description encoding in dorsal-attention cortex was higher in the oldest group, while visual-feature encoding in salience/ventral-attention, limbic, and control networks peaked in the middle group. The authors present MLLM-generated annotations as a scalable complement to, rather than a replacement for, human annotation in naturalistic neuroimaging.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
q-bio.NC · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 10, 2026 (2026-11-10).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T21:02:09.387Z. First observed: 2026-11-11T05:00:55.707Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-11T20:49:15.865Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The abstract describes three animated movies; it does not establish whether the reported patterns generalize to other movies. The encoding model used data from 66 participants aged 5–22 years and covered two of the movies; the abstract does not provide further methodological detail.
Open question
Would the reported patterns, including the movie-dependent valence correspondence, also appear in movies beyond the three animated films studied?
Source-stated
The researchers compared MLLM-generated ToM and valence ratings with human ratings and regional BOLD responses across three animated movies.
We compared MLLM-generated theory-of-mind (ToM) and valence ratings with human ratings and with regional BOLD responses across three animated movies.
Source-stated
The authors report that MLLM ratings partly tracked human judgments, but neural correspondence varied by construct and model.
MLLM ratings partially tracked human judgments, but their neural correspondence differed by construct and model:
Source-stated
ToM had the most consistent human–machine overlap in visual cortex, while valence correspondence was largely movie dependent.
ToM showed the most consistent human--machine overlap in visual cortex, whereas valence correspondence was largely movie dependent.
Source-stated
In the encoding model, visual features produced the strongest and most widespread prediction; scene descriptions were more spatially selective.
In the encoding model, visual features yielded the strongest and most widespread prediction, whereas scene descriptions were more spatially selective,
Source-stated
Age-group comparisons suggested feature-specific differences in encoding across the reported brain networks.
scene-description encoding in dorsal-attention cortex was higher in the oldest group, whereas visual-feature encoding in salience/ventral-attention, limbic, and control networks peaked in the middle group.
Source-stated
The authors present MLLM-generated annotations as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, human annotation in naturalistic neuroimaging.
supporting MLLMs as a scalable complement to, rather than a replacement for, human annotation in naturalistic neuroimaging.
Escape Meridian interpretation
Because the abstract reports results from three animated movies, whether the patterns hold across other movies remains unresolved in this evidence.
across three animated movies.
Source and contributor context
Huang, Yiran, Zhang, Zeyong, Rahman, Rounak, Biswal, Bharat, Di, Xin, Xu, Mengjia · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Multimodal model
A model that works with more than one kind of input or output, such as text, images and audio.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 214aea1b-bdff-49bb-8a6a-1f2519c4c844.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T21:02:09.387Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 31600618f073ac420151e82d1489233e46c0ca2c1ad040f4e4231490a0224883. Source text hash: 82fd5387187024e108ab6442f6a10938520619b15947bdb52424bf7b0a269267.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-11T21:02:09.387Z
arXiv q-bio.NC authors compare human and machine annotations of brain responses
Authors Yiran Huang, Zeyong Zhang, Rounak Rahman, Bharat Biswal, Xin Di and Mengjia Xu investigate whether (MLLMs) can provide scalable annotations for naturalistic fMRI. Across three animated movies, they compared machine-generated theory-of-mind (ToM) and valence ratings with human ratings and regional BOLD responses. They report that MLLM ratings partly tracked human judgments, but neural correspondence differed by construct and model: ToM showed the most consistent human--machine overlap in visual cortex, while valence correspondence was largely movie dependent. In an ROI-wise encoding model using data from 66 participants aged 5–22 years and two movies, visual features yielded the strongest and most widespread prediction. Scene descriptions were more spatially selective, concentrated in dorsal-attention and visual regions and extending into right lateral temporal cortex. Age-group comparisons suggested feature-specific differences: scene-description encoding in dorsal-attention cortex was higher in the oldest group, while visual-feature encoding in salience/ventral-attention, limbic, and control networks peaked in the middle group. The authors present MLLM-generated annotations as a scalable complement to, rather than a replacement for, human annotation in naturalistic neuroimaging.
Original source
q-bio.NC · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 10, 2026 (2026-11-10).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T21:02:09.387Z. First observed: 2026-11-11T05:00:55.707Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-11T20:49:15.865Z.
Limits
The abstract describes three animated movies; it does not establish whether the reported patterns generalize to other movies. The encoding model used data from 66 participants aged 5–22 years and covered two of the movies; the abstract does not provide further methodological detail.
Open question
Would the reported patterns, including the movie-dependent valence correspondence, also appear in movies beyond the three animated films studied?
Source-stated
The researchers compared MLLM-generated ToM and valence ratings with human ratings and regional BOLD responses across three animated movies.
We compared MLLM-generated theory-of-mind (ToM) and valence ratings with human ratings and with regional BOLD responses across three animated movies.
Source-stated
The authors report that MLLM ratings partly tracked human judgments, but neural correspondence varied by construct and model.
MLLM ratings partially tracked human judgments, but their neural correspondence differed by construct and model:
Source-stated
ToM had the most consistent human–machine overlap in visual cortex, while valence correspondence was largely movie dependent.
ToM showed the most consistent human--machine overlap in visual cortex, whereas valence correspondence was largely movie dependent.
Source-stated
In the encoding model, visual features produced the strongest and most widespread prediction; scene descriptions were more spatially selective.
In the encoding model, visual features yielded the strongest and most widespread prediction, whereas scene descriptions were more spatially selective,
Source-stated
Age-group comparisons suggested feature-specific differences in encoding across the reported brain networks.
scene-description encoding in dorsal-attention cortex was higher in the oldest group, whereas visual-feature encoding in salience/ventral-attention, limbic, and control networks peaked in the middle group.
Source-stated
The authors present MLLM-generated annotations as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, human annotation in naturalistic neuroimaging.
supporting MLLMs as a scalable complement to, rather than a replacement for, human annotation in naturalistic neuroimaging.
Escape Meridian interpretation
Because the abstract reports results from three animated movies, whether the patterns hold across other movies remains unresolved in this evidence.
across three animated movies.
Source and contributor context
Huang, Yiran, Zhang, Zeyong, Rahman, Rounak, Biswal, Bharat, Di, Xin, Xu, Mengjia · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Multimodal model
A model that works with more than one kind of input or output, such as text, images and audio.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 214aea1b-bdff-49bb-8a6a-1f2519c4c844.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T21:02:09.387Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 31600618f073ac420151e82d1489233e46c0ca2c1ad040f4e4231490a0224883. Source text hash: 82fd5387187024e108ab6442f6a10938520619b15947bdb52424bf7b0a269267.
uncertain · 2026-11-11T21:02:09.387Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 214aea1b-bdff-49bb-8a6a-1f2519c4c844
attribution — pass: The reading attributes the study and its conclusions to the six listed authors on arXiv q-bio.NC. Findings are framed as the authors' reports ('They report', 'The authors present') rather than established fact.
Authors:Yiran Huang, Zeyong Zhang, Rounak Rahman, Bharat Biswal, Xin Di, Mengjia Xu
summary — uncertain: The body faithfully tracks the abstract, but two problems remain. First, the title says 'annotations of brain responses.' In the source, the annotations describe movie content and are then used to predict brain responses. Smallest repair: 'human and AI movie annotations as predictors of brain responses.' Second, central terms such as fMRI, BOLD, ROI-wise encoding model, theory-of-mind, valence, and dorsal-attention/salience networks are used without plain-language explanation. The reading also never states the practical stake: that AI ratings might reduce labor-intensive human annotation. A general reader may not follow the development or why it matters.
linking movie content to neural responses typically relies on labor-intensive human annotation
date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-11-10, which matches the arXiv submission date for v1. The feed date of 2026-11-11 is a later announcement.
[v1] Tue, 10 Nov 2026 06:25:00 UTC
support — pass: Each claim matches the abstract verbatim in substance. The interpretation about generalization beyond three animated movies is explicitly labeled and appropriately conditional. The question follows from the evidence without leading. No unsupported benefits or costs are implied, and the 'complement, not replacement' conclusion is preserved.
supporting MLLMs as a scalable complement to, rather than a replacement for, human annotation in naturalistic neuroimaging.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the original arXiv abstract page, which is the most direct access to the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A model that works with more than one kind of input or output, such as text, images and audio.
Definition referenceA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA model that works with more than one kind of input or output, such as text, images and audio.
Definition referenceA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv