Kilgore, Joseph, Mahmud, Noemia, Yoo, Shinjae, Park, David Keetae · Sep 19, 2026
arXiv q-bio.NC: Foundation Models as Modular Tools for fMRI Analysis
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Joseph Kilgore, Noemia Mahmud, Shinjae Yoo, and David Keetae Park propose making each brain an independent tool that a fixed language agent can call alongside classical analysis and literature, without retraining. They study fMRI, where models may use different conventions for naming brain locations, and connect BrainLM, which uses atlas parcels, with Omni-fMRI, which uses atlas-free voxels. The authors report that modular access raised holistic answer quality by 0.70 points on a 1-to-5 rubric. They say the gain comes from how the agent selects, parameterizes, and grounds tool calls, and is largest when it must cross FM vocabularies. The two FMs win on different questions, but using both matches the better one; the voxel interface also fails more often from context overflow. The authors frame this as evidence that modular connection works, while orchestration—deciding how connected models are used together—remains work ahead, including across EEG and MRI models. Their reported results are from a first study focused on fMRI and two FMs; they do not establish how orchestration across EEG and MRI models will perform.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
q-bio.NC · Article
Source details
Original source date: Sep 19, 2026 (2026-09-19).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T19:37:42.703Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:37.582Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T19:33:44.920Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The reported result is from a first study using a 76-question ; the abstract reports 3,040 judged traces but gives n=34 for the holistic answer-quality result. The abstract describes fMRI and two specific FMs; it does not report results for orchestration across EEG and MRI models.
Open question
What approaches could address the orchestration work the authors identify across EEG and MRI models?
Source-stated
The authors propose using each brain foundation model as an independent tool server called by a fixed language agent, without retraining.
each FM becomes an independent tool server that a fixed language agent calls next to classical and literature tools, with no retraining
Source-stated
In the reported fMRI study, modular FM access raised holistic answer quality by 0.70 points on a 1-to-5 rubric.
modular FM access raises holistic answer quality by $+0.70$ on a 1 to 5 rubric
Source-stated
The authors attribute the gain to the agent’s tool-call choices and grounding, with the largest gain where it must cross FM vocabularies.
The gain lands in how the agent selects, parameterizes, and grounds tool calls, and peaks where the agent must cross FM vocabularies.
Source-stated
The two FMs performed best on different questions, but using both matched the better one; the voxel interface failed more often from context overflow.
The two FMs win on different questions, yet mounting both matches the better one, and the voxel interface fails 7.8 times more often by context overflow.
Source-stated
The authors identify orchestrating connected models, including across EEG and MRI models, as work ahead.
Orchestrating what it connects, across EEG and MRI models, is the work ahead.
Source and contributor context
Kilgore, Joseph, Mahmud, Noemia, Yoo, Shinjae, Park, David Keetae · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Foundation model
A large model trained on broad data that can be adapted to many different tasks.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: a037c653-eae8-410b-8e24-580830ba78f2.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T19:37:42.703Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 52de04b0b7847761dc5ff64593506147d832b52bb53085da0883d671a7fd30d3. Source text hash: 10b2706639dccb161f0ea94766b43865a7f45275aaffc97447a9099c47c016a9.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-08T19:37:42.703Z
arXiv q-bio.NC: Foundation Models as Modular Tools for fMRI Analysis
Joseph Kilgore, Noemia Mahmud, Shinjae Yoo, and David Keetae Park propose making each brain an independent tool that a fixed language agent can call alongside classical analysis and literature, without retraining. They study fMRI, where models may use different conventions for naming brain locations, and connect BrainLM, which uses atlas parcels, with Omni-fMRI, which uses atlas-free voxels. The authors report that modular access raised holistic answer quality by 0.70 points on a 1-to-5 rubric. They say the gain comes from how the agent selects, parameterizes, and grounds tool calls, and is largest when it must cross FM vocabularies. The two FMs win on different questions, but using both matches the better one; the voxel interface also fails more often from context overflow. The authors frame this as evidence that modular connection works, while orchestration—deciding how connected models are used together—remains work ahead, including across EEG and MRI models. Their reported results are from a first study focused on fMRI and two FMs; they do not establish how orchestration across EEG and MRI models will perform.
Original source
q-bio.NC · Article
Source details
Original source date: Sep 19, 2026 (2026-09-19).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T19:37:42.703Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:00:37.582Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T19:33:44.920Z.
Limits
The reported result is from a first study using a 76-question ; the abstract reports 3,040 judged traces but gives n=34 for the holistic answer-quality result. The abstract describes fMRI and two specific FMs; it does not report results for orchestration across EEG and MRI models.
Open question
What approaches could address the orchestration work the authors identify across EEG and MRI models?
Source-stated
The authors propose using each brain foundation model as an independent tool server called by a fixed language agent, without retraining.
each FM becomes an independent tool server that a fixed language agent calls next to classical and literature tools, with no retraining
Source-stated
In the reported fMRI study, modular FM access raised holistic answer quality by 0.70 points on a 1-to-5 rubric.
modular FM access raises holistic answer quality by $+0.70$ on a 1 to 5 rubric
Source-stated
The authors attribute the gain to the agent’s tool-call choices and grounding, with the largest gain where it must cross FM vocabularies.
The gain lands in how the agent selects, parameterizes, and grounds tool calls, and peaks where the agent must cross FM vocabularies.
Source-stated
The two FMs performed best on different questions, but using both matched the better one; the voxel interface failed more often from context overflow.
The two FMs win on different questions, yet mounting both matches the better one, and the voxel interface fails 7.8 times more often by context overflow.
Source-stated
The authors identify orchestrating connected models, including across EEG and MRI models, as work ahead.
Orchestrating what it connects, across EEG and MRI models, is the work ahead.
Source and contributor context
Kilgore, Joseph, Mahmud, Noemia, Yoo, Shinjae, Park, David Keetae · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Foundation model
A large model trained on broad data that can be adapted to many different tasks.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: a037c653-eae8-410b-8e24-580830ba78f2.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T19:37:42.703Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 52de04b0b7847761dc5ff64593506147d832b52bb53085da0883d671a7fd30d3. Source text hash: 10b2706639dccb161f0ea94766b43865a7f45275aaffc97447a9099c47c016a9.
uncertain · 2026-11-08T19:37:42.703Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: a037c653-eae8-410b-8e24-580830ba78f2
attribution — pass: The draft correctly credits the proposal and results to Joseph Kilgore, Noemia Mahmud, Shinjae Yoo and David Keetae Park, the authors listed on the arXiv page. It frames findings as what the authors report.
Authors:Joseph Kilgore, Noemia Mahmud, Shinjae Yoo, David Keetae Park
summary — uncertain: The summary is faithful but hard for a general reader to follow. It never says the 0.70 gain was scored by an independent LLM judge, so readers may assume human expert grading. It drops the paper's motivating contrast: the usual route, representation alignment, binds one FM to one LLM and needs retraining for each model added. Central terms (fMRI, atlas parcels, voxels, context overflow, FM vocabularies) need tooltips. It also softens 7.8 times to more often and public FMs already disagree to may use. Smallest repair: name the LLM judge, add the alignment contrast, and restore 7.8 times.
Representation alignment, the usual route from an FM into a language model, binds one FM to one LLM and requires retraining for every model added.
date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-09-19 matches the v1 submission date on arXiv. The November feed date is correctly not used.
[Submitted on 19 Sep 2026]
support — pass: Each claim quotes the abstract verbatim and is framed as source-stated. The limitations correctly separate the 3,040 traces from n=34 and note the absence of EEG/MRI orchestration results. The question follows directly from the authors' stated future work without presuming an answer. Nothing is upgraded into demonstrated real-world reliability.
In this first study, modular FM access raises holistic answer quality by $+0.70$ on a 1 to 5 rubric (95% CI $[+0.44, +0.97]$, $n=34$).
media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the most direct access to the source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A large model trained on broad data that can be adapted to many different tasks.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referenceA large model trained on broad data that can be adapted to many different tasks.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition reference