Wu, Shunyu, Li, Dan, Ye, Haozheng, Feng, Weibin, Lou, Jian, Zhang, Bo, Feng, Wenjie, Guo, Chenjuan, Ng, See-Kiong · Jun 2, 2026
arXiv: TSQAgent uses specialized roles to rate time series data quality
Markdown · JSON · Original source
The authors of TSQAgent argue that struggle to identify which quality dimensions matter for data and to compare quality using grounded evidence. They propose TSQAgent, a framework with three collaborative roles: Perceiver selects relevant dimensions, Inspector analyzes them quantitatively, and Adjudicator aggregates and refines the final judgment. The authors also describe an agent workflow with external analytical tools for quantitative comparisons on selected dimensions. They report experiments on TSQBench, their , and eleven real-world datasets, saying the framework improves quality understanding and quantitative comparison and translates those improvements into better quality-aware data selection, downstream performance, and data efficiency. The authors’ approach centers on choosing and measuring relevant dimensions, rather than relying on manually predefined dimensions and purely text-based reasoning. Their reported results connect those capabilities to data selection and downstream performance, making the quality assessment problem consequential for how data is used. The abstract does not provide effect sizes or explain how results vary across datasets, so the scale and consistency of the reported improvements cannot be assessed from this account alone.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Jun 2, 2026 (2026-06-02).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T17:16:39.639Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:03:22.525Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T17:10:43.118Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The abstract does not provide quantitative effect sizes or describe how results vary across the eleven real-world datasets. The reported improvements are the authors’ claims in the abstract; the supplied evidence does not include experiment details for independently assessing them.
Open question
How do the reported improvements in quality-aware data selection and downstream performance vary across the eleven real-world datasets?
Source-stated
The authors say existing approaches rely on manually predefined quality dimensions and purely text-based reasoning.
existing approaches rely on manually predefined quality dimensions and purely text-based reasoning
Source-stated
The authors report that current LLMs struggle to identify relevant quality dimensions and make evidence-grounded quality comparisons.
current LLMs consistently struggle with both dimension identification and evidence-grounded quality comparison
Source-stated
TSQAgent uses three collaborative roles: Perceiver, Inspector, and Adjudicator.
three collaborative roles: Perceiver for focused dimension selection, Inspector for dimension-wise quantitative analysis, and Adjudicator that aggregates and refines the final judgment
Source-stated
The authors report experiments on their benchmark and eleven real-world datasets, with improvements that they say lead to better quality-aware data selection, downstream performance, and data efficiency.
Experiments on both the proposed benchmark and eleven real-world datasets demonstrate that our framework not only substantially improves LLMs' capabilities in quality understanding and quantitative comparison but also effectively translates these improvements into better quality-aware data selection
Source and contributor context
Wu, Shunyu, Li, Dan, Ye, Haozheng, Feng, Weibin, Lou, Jian, Zhang, Bo, Feng, Wenjie, Guo, Chenjuan, Ng, See-Kiong · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Time-series
Observations arranged over time, such as monthly sales; forecasting uses their patterns to estimate later values.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 386d818b-8118-4345-81f2-ff932a0f5006.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T17:16:39.639Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 275bd27a6f7d92757fd0e862fc4eb3407ec218354e90dc6f4d71ae8a851351b2. Source text hash: ced8684f75177003767aa3a693331d11b083875af82e1780e4b9fa7d01be9d88.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-08T17:16:39.639Z
arXiv: TSQAgent uses specialized roles to rate time series data quality
The authors of TSQAgent argue that struggle to identify which quality dimensions matter for data and to compare quality using grounded evidence. They propose TSQAgent, a framework with three collaborative roles: Perceiver selects relevant dimensions, Inspector analyzes them quantitatively, and Adjudicator aggregates and refines the final judgment. The authors also describe an agent workflow with external analytical tools for quantitative comparisons on selected dimensions. They report experiments on TSQBench, their , and eleven real-world datasets, saying the framework improves quality understanding and quantitative comparison and translates those improvements into better quality-aware data selection, downstream performance, and data efficiency. The authors’ approach centers on choosing and measuring relevant dimensions, rather than relying on manually predefined dimensions and purely text-based reasoning. Their reported results connect those capabilities to data selection and downstream performance, making the quality assessment problem consequential for how data is used. The abstract does not provide effect sizes or explain how results vary across datasets, so the scale and consistency of the reported improvements cannot be assessed from this account alone.
Original source
cs.AI · Article
Source details
Original source date: Jun 2, 2026 (2026-06-02).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-08T17:16:39.639Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:03:22.525Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-08T17:10:43.118Z.
Limits
The abstract does not provide quantitative effect sizes or describe how results vary across the eleven real-world datasets. The reported improvements are the authors’ claims in the abstract; the supplied evidence does not include experiment details for independently assessing them.
Open question
How do the reported improvements in quality-aware data selection and downstream performance vary across the eleven real-world datasets?
Source-stated
The authors say existing approaches rely on manually predefined quality dimensions and purely text-based reasoning.
existing approaches rely on manually predefined quality dimensions and purely text-based reasoning
Source-stated
The authors report that current LLMs struggle to identify relevant quality dimensions and make evidence-grounded quality comparisons.
current LLMs consistently struggle with both dimension identification and evidence-grounded quality comparison
Source-stated
TSQAgent uses three collaborative roles: Perceiver, Inspector, and Adjudicator.
three collaborative roles: Perceiver for focused dimension selection, Inspector for dimension-wise quantitative analysis, and Adjudicator that aggregates and refines the final judgment
Source-stated
The authors report experiments on their benchmark and eleven real-world datasets, with improvements that they say lead to better quality-aware data selection, downstream performance, and data efficiency.
Experiments on both the proposed benchmark and eleven real-world datasets demonstrate that our framework not only substantially improves LLMs' capabilities in quality understanding and quantitative comparison but also effectively translates these improvements into better quality-aware data selection
Source and contributor context
Wu, Shunyu, Li, Dan, Ye, Haozheng, Feng, Weibin, Lou, Jian, Zhang, Bo, Feng, Wenjie, Guo, Chenjuan, Ng, See-Kiong · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Time-series
Observations arranged over time, such as monthly sales; forecasting uses their patterns to estimate later values.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Benchmark
A defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: 386d818b-8118-4345-81f2-ff932a0f5006.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-08T17:16:39.639Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 275bd27a6f7d92757fd0e862fc4eb3407ec218354e90dc6f4d71ae8a851351b2. Source text hash: ced8684f75177003767aa3a693331d11b083875af82e1780e4b9fa7d01be9d88.
passed · 2026-11-08T17:16:39.639Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: 386d818b-8118-4345-81f2-ff932a0f5006
attribution — pass: The reading consistently attributes the problem framing, the TSQAgent design and the experimental results to the paper's authors. It presents reported improvements as the authors' claims rather than as established facts.
Authors:Shunyu Wu, Dan Li, Haozheng Ye, Weibin Feng, Jian Lou, Bo Zhang, Wenjie Feng, Chenjuan Guo, See-Kiong Ng
summary — pass: The title, summary and question faithfully capture the abstract: the LLM limitations, the three roles, the tool-equipped workflow, TSQBench and the eleven-dataset experiments. Central terms such as time series, quality dimensions and downstream performance are kept exactly and are suitable for term-library tooltips. The question follows from a gap the abstract leaves open. The authors' force is slightly softened by dropping 'consistently' and 'substantially', but the meaning is preserved.
Assessing the quality of time series (TS) data is fundamental yet inherently challenging due to the multifaceted nature of quality dimensions.
date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-06-02, which matches the v1 submission date. It correctly uses the first submission rather than the 5 Nov 2026 revision or the November feed date.
[Submitted on 2 Jun 2026 (v1), last revised 5 Nov 2026 (this version, v2)]
support — pass: Each claim's excerpt matches the abstract verbatim. The significance sentence, that results connect to data selection and downstream performance, is directly supported. The limitations correctly note that the abstract gives no effect sizes or per-dataset breakdown. The reading does not convert benchmark results into proven real-world reliability.
leading to enhanced downstream performance and data efficiency
media — pass: The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page for this paper, the direct original source. No other media candidates were found.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceObservations arranged over time, such as monthly sales; forecasting uses their patterns to estimate later values.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referenceObservations arranged over time, such as monthly sales; forecasting uses their patterns to estimate later values.
Definition referenceA defined set of tests used to compare systems. Results depend on the tasks and measures selected.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv