arXiv: Uncertainty-Aware Resource Orchestration for Agentic AI Systems

arXiv: Uncertainty-Aware Resource Orchestration for Agentic AI Systems

Masoud Shokrnezhad and Tarik Taleb propose Conformal Reservation for Orchestration (CRO), an online method for allocating compute and bandwidth to agentic AI systems whose resource demands are unknown at dispatch time. These systems run multi-step pipelines that call tools and use intermediate observations, so their eventual compute, bandwidth and latency needs emerge during execution. The authors frame the problem as reserving resources and checking deadline feasibility at dispatch, each with a prescribed probability. CRO uses a sliding window of past execution traces to set allocations, applying conformal prediction to provide finite-sample, distribution-free coverage guarantees. In simulations with heterogeneous task mixes and multi-modal and heavy-tailed demand profiles, the authors report that CRO alone among evaluated methods met target probabilistic coverage across all risk levels. Among methods meeting coverage targets, they report CRO had the lowest over-reservation, roughly halving resource waste compared with the Chebyshev-bound baseline. The approach addresses the tradeoff the authors describe: under-provisioning risks throttling and deadline violations, while over-provisioning wastes capacity. The reported results come from simulations.

Publication: 6729f37a-963a-4507-83d2-ed5deba748ed

attribution — pass: The reading names Masoud Shokrnezhad and Tarik Taleb as the authors, matching the arXiv page. It keeps the method, coverage results and over-reservation results attributed to the authors ('they report', 'the authors report') rather than stating them as established fact.

Authors:Masoud Shokrnezhad, Tarik Taleb

summary — pass: The reading faithfully conveys the problem: agent pipelines have demands that are unknown at dispatch, creating a tradeoff between under- and over-provisioning. It also covers the CRO method and the simulation-only results, and the title and question are neutral. It omits minor source details such as stochastic token sampling and scarce edge or cloud capacity. Central terms are kept exactly but not explained inline. Tooltips should cover conformal prediction, finite-sample/distribution-free coverage guarantees, dispatch time, heavy-tailed and the Chebyshev-bound baseline. The gist remains understandable.

the aggregate compute, bandwidth, and end-to-end latency demands of such pipelines are unknown at dispatch time

date — uncertain: evidence.originalPublished (2026-09-14) matches the page's 'Submitted on 14 Sep 2026' and the v1 history. However, the identifier arXiv:2611.05392 encodes a November 2026 submission period, and the feed entry is dated 2026-11-05. A September v1 date is inconsistent with a 2611 identifier. The first-submission date therefore cannot be confirmed from this evidence alone.

[Submitted on 14 Sep 2026]

support — pass: Every claim matches abstract text, including the coverage guarantees, the result that CRO is the only method meeting coverage, the lowest over-reservation, roughly halving waste versus the Chebyshev baseline, and the provisioning tradeoff. The reading states that results come from simulations and does not turn them into real-world reliability. The question about performance beyond simulations follows from the evidence without presupposing an answer. No benefits or costs are invented.

roughly halving the resource waste of the Chebyshev-bound baseline

media — pass: The selected media ID is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page, which is the original source. It is the most direct way for readers to access the paper.