Skip to content
Escape
Meridian

The future is still open.

Zou, Longwei, Zhong, Lin · May 18, 2026

arXiv: Zou and Zhong propose KVBuffer for linear attention serving

Markdown · JSON · Original source

Longwei Zou and Lin Zhong argue that serving linear attention can become inefficient even though its decoding cost stays constant as grows. Systems repeatedly access and update a large linear attention state, which is much larger than a token’s key and value. Their proposed KVBuffer buffers recent keys and values so serving systems can choose how to compute outputs. In decoding, it groups work into chunks and defers state updates. The authors say this reduces average memory access and decoding . For speculative decoding, it verifies draft tokens in parallel without storing temporary states; for short contexts, it computes outputs from buffered keys and values without creating or updating the state. The authors implemented KVBuffer in SGLang for Qwen3.5 and Nemotron-3 series models. They report up to 1.47x faster batch decoding and a fivefold increase in the maximum number of serving requests for speculative decoding when verifying four draft tokens. These are reported evaluation results for the named setup, not a general guarantee for other models or serving conditions.

Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.

arXiv cs.AIArticle · arxiv.orgOpen original source

Original source

cs.AI · Article

Source details

Original source date: May 18, 2026 (2026-05-18).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T01:53:04.275Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:07:03.491Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T01:48:51.242Z.

Referenced by

Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.

No public references recorded here yet.

Reference data (JSON)

Limits

The reported results are evaluations of KVBuffer implemented in SGLang for Qwen3.5 and Nemotron-3 series models; the abstract does not establish that the gains extend to other models or serving conditions. The supplied evidence is the paper abstract and does not give the evaluation settings needed to compare results across and workloads.

Open question

How do the reported speed and request-capacity gains vary across and serving conditions?

Source-stated

The authors say linear attention serving can incur substantial memory access because systems recurrently compute and update a large state at each decoding step.

recurrently computing and updating a large linear attention state in every decoding step

Source-stated

KVBuffer buffers recent keys and values to let serving systems compute linear attention outputs in more flexible and memory-efficient ways.

By buffering recent keys and values, KVBuffer enables serving systems to compute linear attention outputs in more flexible and memory-efficient ways.

Source-stated

For decoding, KVBuffer uses chunkwise computation, defers state updates, and applies them in batch; the authors say this reduces average memory access and decoding latency.

reduces average memory access and decoding latency by deferring state updates and applying them in batch

Source-stated

The authors report up to 1.47x faster batch decoding and a fivefold increase in maximum serving requests for speculative decoding when verifying four draft tokens.

speedup batch decoding by up to 1.47x and increase the maximum number of serving requests by 5x for speculative decoding when verifying four draft tokens

Source and contributor context

Zou, Longwei, Zhong, Lin · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.

Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

Context window

How much text a model can take in and consider at one time.

Latency

The delay between sending a request and receiving the result.

arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: b9cd6444-3dd4-4d18-8d8c-35737ef9cd6f.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T01:53:04.275Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.

Observation: 68139892f07ac5f1c4334d1c533bd33c45f0abb7bf0b0f100e9cfec4bbb58a2a. Source text hash: f0ce7f25fcfc32dea458fc0636aeb04fe7dad2fc222c48ac10c238376130826b.

Revision and source-check history

Version 1 · 2026-11-09T01:53:04.275Z

arXiv: Zou and Zhong propose KVBuffer for linear attention serving

Longwei Zou and Lin Zhong argue that serving linear attention can become inefficient even though its decoding cost stays constant as grows. Systems repeatedly access and update a large linear attention state, which is much larger than a token’s key and value. Their proposed KVBuffer buffers recent keys and values so serving systems can choose how to compute outputs. In decoding, it groups work into chunks and defers state updates. The authors say this reduces average memory access and decoding . For speculative decoding, it verifies draft tokens in parallel without storing temporary states; for short contexts, it computes outputs from buffered keys and values without creating or updating the state. The authors implemented KVBuffer in SGLang for Qwen3.5 and Nemotron-3 series models. They report up to 1.47x faster batch decoding and a fivefold increase in the maximum number of serving requests for speculative decoding when verifying four draft tokens. These are reported evaluation results for the named setup, not a general guarantee for other models or serving conditions.

Original source

cs.AI · Article

Source details

Original source date: May 18, 2026 (2026-05-18).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-09T01:53:04.275Z. First observed: 2026-11-06T05:07:03.491Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-09T01:48:51.242Z.

Limits

The reported results are evaluations of KVBuffer implemented in SGLang for Qwen3.5 and Nemotron-3 series models; the abstract does not establish that the gains extend to other models or serving conditions. The supplied evidence is the paper abstract and does not give the evaluation settings needed to compare results across and workloads.

Open question

How do the reported speed and request-capacity gains vary across and serving conditions?

Source-stated

The authors say linear attention serving can incur substantial memory access because systems recurrently compute and update a large state at each decoding step.

recurrently computing and updating a large linear attention state in every decoding step

Source-stated

KVBuffer buffers recent keys and values to let serving systems compute linear attention outputs in more flexible and memory-efficient ways.

By buffering recent keys and values, KVBuffer enables serving systems to compute linear attention outputs in more flexible and memory-efficient ways.

Source-stated

For decoding, KVBuffer uses chunkwise computation, defers state updates, and applies them in batch; the authors say this reduces average memory access and decoding latency.

reduces average memory access and decoding latency by deferring state updates and applying them in batch

Source-stated

The authors report up to 1.47x faster batch decoding and a fivefold increase in maximum serving requests for speculative decoding when verifying four draft tokens.

speedup batch decoding by up to 1.47x and increase the maximum number of serving requests by 5x for speculative decoding when verifying four draft tokens

Source and contributor context

Zou, Longwei, Zhong, Lin · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.

Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

Context window

How much text a model can take in and consider at one time.

Latency

The delay between sending a request and receiving the result.

arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: b9cd6444-3dd4-4d18-8d8c-35737ef9cd6f.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-09T01:53:04.275Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.

Observation: 68139892f07ac5f1c4334d1c533bd33c45f0abb7bf0b0f100e9cfec4bbb58a2a. Source text hash: f0ce7f25fcfc32dea458fc0636aeb04fe7dad2fc222c48ac10c238376130826b.

uncertain · 2026-11-09T01:53:04.275Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Publication: b9cd6444-3dd4-4d18-8d8c-35737ef9cd6f

attribution — pass: The reading correctly credits KVBuffer to Longwei Zou and Lin Zhong on arXiv. Mechanisms and results are framed as the authors' proposal and reported evaluations, not as established fact.

Authors:Longwei Zou, Lin Zhong

summary — uncertain: The summary is faithful to the abstract but hard for a non-specialist to follow. 'Linear attention', 'keys and values', 'decoding', 'speculative decoding', 'draft tokens' and 'SGLang' are never framed in plain words. It never says that serving means running a model to answer user requests, so readers cannot see why lower latency and more concurrent requests matter. Smallest repair: one plain-language framing sentence, keeping the exact terms with tooltips, stating the source-supported stake of faster, higher-capacity serving for these long-context models.

Linear attention has recently gained significant attention for long-context inference due to its constant decoding cost with respect to context length.

date — pass: originalPublished 2026-05-18 matches the v1 submission date. It correctly ignores the 5 Nov 2026 v2 revision and the November feed date.

Submitted on 18 May 2026 (v1), last revised 5 Nov 2026 (this version, v2)

support — pass: All claims match the abstract: the state is larger than per-token keys and values, chunkwise computation defers state updates, speculative verification runs in parallel, short contexts skip the state, and the implementation is in SGLang for Qwen3.5 and Nemotron-3. The 1.47x and 5x figures keep their conditions. The limitations and question appropriately mark scope as unknown without inventing settings.

Our evaluations show that KVBuffer can speedup batch decoding by up to 1.47x and increase the maximum number of serving requests by 5x for speculative decoding when verifying four draft tokens.

media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct arXiv abstract page for this paper. It is the most direct way to reach the source.

Challenge or correct this reading

Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.