Derner, Erik, Kubalík, Jiří, Babuška, Robert · Nov 9, 2026
ASPIRE: Agentic system identification — arXiv
Markdown · JSON · Original source
Erik Derner, Jiří Kubalík and Robert Babuška propose ASPIRE, a framework in which a agent selects and carries out methods for nonlinear system identification: building mathematical models of systems from measured data. The framework constructs closed-form, nonlinear static or dynamic models, optionally using a system description, intended use and physical requirements. Each model includes an estimation record, an interpretation of its terms and an error evaluated on test data inaccessible to the agent; formal physical requirements are verified independently. The authors tested ASPIRE on a mobile robot, a rotational system with dry friction and a laboratory fermenter, using five runs per task, with and without a description. All 30 runs delivered valid models, at a cost of 0.96 to 3.38 US dollars per run. In the authors’ assessment, the 30 recommended models fully satisfied 132 of 150 assessed items and partly satisfied 18. The most frequent discrepancy, found in nine models, was inaccurate or unsupported claims about model structure selection.
Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.
Original source
eess.SY · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 9, 2026 (2026-11-09).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T20:31:21.936Z. First observed: 2026-11-11T05:03:47.643Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-11T20:18:16.991Z.
Referenced by
Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.
No public references recorded here yet.
Limits
The reported evaluation covers three measured systems and five runs per task, with and without a description; the abstract does not report results beyond those tests.
Open question
What caused the inaccurate or unsupported claims about model structure selection found in nine models?
Source-stated
The authors propose ASPIRE, a framework for nonlinear system identification in which a large language model agent selects and executes the identification method.
We propose ASPIRE, a framework for nonlinear system identification in which a large language model agent selects and executes the identification method.
Source-stated
ASPIRE builds closed-form, nonlinear static or dynamic models from measured data, with optional system descriptions, intended uses and physical requirements.
ASPIRE constructs closed-form, nonlinear static or dynamic models from measured data, optionally supplemented by a system description, the intended use of the model, and physical requirements
Source-stated
The authors evaluated ASPIRE on three measured systems, using five runs per task with and without a description; all 30 runs delivered valid models at a cost of 0.96 to 3.38 US dollars per run.
Each system is tested with and without a description, in five runs per task. All 30 runs delivered valid models, at a cost of 0.96 to 3.38 US dollars per run.
Source-stated
In the authors’ assessment of the recommended models, 132 of 150 items were fully satisfied and 18 partly satisfied; nine models had inaccurate or unsupported claims about model structure selection.
fully satisfied 132 of 150 assessed items and partly satisfied 18. The most frequent discrepancy, found in nine models, concerned inaccurate or unsupported claims about model structure selection.
Source and contributor context
Derner, Erik, Kubalík, Jiří, Babuška, Robert · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Agentic AI
AI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: c420516b-bf43-4940-8e72-f4a3b1a5b913.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T20:31:21.936Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 3a89df1c9caa7a5a70d04b4198b5dd77849f38abfc3b5a65dbc06ba3f8b3b0aa. Source text hash: 0174937c3bc0750f53da27a5c72da1b6e9c2e9ba319b2a5d36cb6a7a929a1035.
Revision and source-check history
Version 1 · 2026-11-11T20:31:21.936Z
ASPIRE: Agentic system identification — arXiv
Erik Derner, Jiří Kubalík and Robert Babuška propose ASPIRE, a framework in which a agent selects and carries out methods for nonlinear system identification: building mathematical models of systems from measured data. The framework constructs closed-form, nonlinear static or dynamic models, optionally using a system description, intended use and physical requirements. Each model includes an estimation record, an interpretation of its terms and an error evaluated on test data inaccessible to the agent; formal physical requirements are verified independently. The authors tested ASPIRE on a mobile robot, a rotational system with dry friction and a laboratory fermenter, using five runs per task, with and without a description. All 30 runs delivered valid models, at a cost of 0.96 to 3.38 US dollars per run. In the authors’ assessment, the 30 recommended models fully satisfied 132 of 150 assessed items and partly satisfied 18. The most frequent discrepancy, found in nine models, was inaccurate or unsupported claims about model structure selection.
Original source
eess.SY · Article
Source details
Original source date: Nov 9, 2026 (2026-11-09).
Date basis: Date basis not provided.
Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T20:31:21.936Z. First observed: 2026-11-11T05:03:47.643Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-11T20:18:16.991Z.
Limits
The reported evaluation covers three measured systems and five runs per task, with and without a description; the abstract does not report results beyond those tests.
Open question
What caused the inaccurate or unsupported claims about model structure selection found in nine models?
Source-stated
The authors propose ASPIRE, a framework for nonlinear system identification in which a large language model agent selects and executes the identification method.
We propose ASPIRE, a framework for nonlinear system identification in which a large language model agent selects and executes the identification method.
Source-stated
ASPIRE builds closed-form, nonlinear static or dynamic models from measured data, with optional system descriptions, intended uses and physical requirements.
ASPIRE constructs closed-form, nonlinear static or dynamic models from measured data, optionally supplemented by a system description, the intended use of the model, and physical requirements
Source-stated
The authors evaluated ASPIRE on three measured systems, using five runs per task with and without a description; all 30 runs delivered valid models at a cost of 0.96 to 3.38 US dollars per run.
Each system is tested with and without a description, in five runs per task. All 30 runs delivered valid models, at a cost of 0.96 to 3.38 US dollars per run.
Source-stated
In the authors’ assessment of the recommended models, 132 of 150 items were fully satisfied and 18 partly satisfied; nine models had inaccurate or unsupported claims about model structure selection.
fully satisfied 132 of 150 assessed items and partly satisfied 18. The most frequent discrepancy, found in nine models, concerned inaccurate or unsupported claims about model structure selection.
Source and contributor context
Derner, Erik, Kubalík, Jiří, Babuška, Robert · Article author
These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.
Source media
No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.
Terms and references
Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.
Agentic AI
AI systems that plan and carry out a series of steps toward a goal, often by using other software, rather than giving one answer.
Large language model
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
arXiv
arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Editorial provenance
Version 1. Publication ID: c420516b-bf43-4940-8e72-f4a3b1a5b913.
Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.
Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T20:31:21.936Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.
Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.
Observation: 3a89df1c9caa7a5a70d04b4198b5dd77849f38abfc3b5a65dbc06ba3f8b3b0aa. Source text hash: 0174937c3bc0750f53da27a5c72da1b6e9c2e9ba319b2a5d36cb6a7a929a1035.
uncertain · 2026-11-11T20:31:21.936Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5
Publication: c420516b-bf43-4940-8e72-f4a3b1a5b913
attribution — pass: The reading correctly attributes ASPIRE to Erik Derner, Jiří Kubalík and Robert Babuška. It also keeps the evaluation results framed as the authors' reported findings and assessment, not as established fact.
Authors:Erik Derner, Jiří Kubalík, Robert Babuška
summary — uncertain: Mostly faithful, but three gaps affect a general reader. First, it omits the abstract's motivating point that system identification requires expert decisions, which is why an agent choosing the method matters. Second, the passage 'fully satisfied 132 of 150 assessed items' drops what those items covered: model interpretation and documentation of structure selection and parameter estimation. A reader could take it as a measure of model accuracy. Third, 'closed-form' and 'nonlinear static or dynamic' lack tooltips. Smallest repair: add the expert-decision framing, specify the items' scope, and add term-library entries.
the interpretation of the model and the documentation of its structure selection and parameter estimation fully satisfied 132 of 150 assessed items
date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-11-09 matches the arXiv v1 submission date. The later feed date of 2026-11-11 is correctly not used.
[Submitted on 9 Nov 2026]
support — pass: Each claim is quoted or closely paraphrased from the abstract. The costs, run counts, assessment numbers and the nine-model discrepancy are all supported. The limitation stays within the evidence. The question asks about a cause the abstract does not explain, so it is a genuine open issue rather than an unsupported claim.
All 30 runs delivered valid models, at a cost of 0.96 to 3.38 US dollars per run.
media — pass: The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the direct original source.
Challenge or correct this reading
Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.
A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXivA language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.
Definition referencearXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.
Explore arXiv