Skip to content
Escape
Meridian

Wang, Jiansheng, Singh, Jaskeerat, Xu, Haochen, Li, Xinyi, Yan, Mingyuan, Liu, Shaohui, Li, Yuzhuo, Chen, Yize, Cui, Wenqi · Oct 28, 2026

Authors of an arXiv paper introduce LLM-PowerTrace, a dataset of GPU power traces

Markdown · JSON · Original source

The authors introduce -PowerTrace, an open dataset of per- power measurements for LLM and inference, sampled every 100 ms and paired with workload and system metadata. They argue that total energy figures alone miss how power draw changes over time: peaks, ramps and synchronized fluctuations that may affect data centers and power grids. The dataset includes measurements across model families and varying workloads. For fine-tuning, the authors sweep batch size, sequence length, precision, parallelism and checkpointing; for inference, they vary concurrency, GPU frequency, KV-cache and weight , prompt and output lengths, and request-arrival patterns. They also define power-grid-facing metrics and an power&energy to extrapolate beyond measured settings. The authors present the dataset as a foundation for modeling, forecasting and managing AI compute’s changing electrical behavior. Whether these measurements and extrapolations generalize to other hardware and real-world deployments remains open.

Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.

arXiv cs.AIArticle · arxiv.orgOpen original source

Original source

cs.AI · Article

Source details

Original source date: Oct 28, 2026 (2026-10-28).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:40:59.359Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T05:02:44.526Z.

Referenced by

Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.

No public references recorded here yet.

Reference data (JSON)

Limits

The abstract does not establish how well the measurements or generalize beyond the profiled platforms, models and workloads. The evidence is the paper’s abstract and does not report validation results for forecasts or effects on power-grid operations.

Open question

How well do the dataset’s measurements and predict power behavior on hardware and workloads beyond those profiled?

Source-stated

The authors introduce an open dataset of time-resolved, per-GPU power traces for LLM fine-tuning and inference, sampled every 100 ms and paired with workload and system metadata.

an open dataset of time-resolved, per-GPU power traces for LLM fine-tuning and inference, sampled every 100\,ms on varying NVIDIA platforms paired with complete workload and system metadata.

Source-stated

The authors argue that total energy measurements alone leave important time-varying power behavior poorly characterized, including peaks, ramps and synchronized fluctuations.

Existing energy benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) report aggregate quantities such as joules per token and rarely release the underlying time-series measurements, leaving these power dynamics poorly characterized

Source-stated

The dataset varies workloads and system settings for both fine-tuning and inference.

controlled sweeps over batch size, sequence length, precision, parallelism, and checkpointing. For inference, it covers variations in concurrency, GPU frequency, KV-cache and weight quantization

Source-stated

The authors define power-grid-facing metrics and an AI-compute power and energy scaling law for extrapolating beyond measured settings.

we define power-grid-facing metrics as well as AI-compute power\&energy scaling law for extrapolating beyond the measured settings.

Source-stated

The paper presents the dataset as a basis for modeling, forecasting and managing AI compute’s changing electrical behavior.

provides a dataset foundation for modeling, forecasting, and managing the fast-changing electrical behavior of AI compute.

Source and contributor context

Wang, Jiansheng, Singh, Jaskeerat, Xu, Haochen, Li, Xinyi, Yan, Mingyuan, Liu, Shaohui, Li, Yuzhuo, Chen, Yize, Cui, Wenqi · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.

Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

Large language model

A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.

Graphics processing unit

A chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models.

Fine-tuning

Further training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.

Quantization

Storing a model's numbers at lower precision so it uses less memory and runs faster, sometimes at a cost in accuracy.

AI compute

The computing resources, meaning chips, data centers and electricity, used to train or run AI models.

Scaling laws

Observed patterns in which model performance improves predictably as data, model size and computation grow.

arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

NVIDIA

NVIDIA develops processors, networking and software used for AI, graphics and scientific computing.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: b7f44020-513e-4dff-8c25-2166a0eda440.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.

Observation: ac496e48791355329d3753dad3b7572b5441e54267985fefec5eb13299e2dc72. Source text hash: 0978b65450afe78e74aedb630b41bfd634595cb1a954ff555c0e35186b7a95b3.

Revision and source-check history

Version 1 · 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z

Authors of an arXiv paper introduce LLM-PowerTrace, a dataset of GPU power traces

The authors introduce -PowerTrace, an open dataset of per- power measurements for LLM and inference, sampled every 100 ms and paired with workload and system metadata. They argue that total energy figures alone miss how power draw changes over time: peaks, ramps and synchronized fluctuations that may affect data centers and power grids. The dataset includes measurements across model families and varying workloads. For fine-tuning, the authors sweep batch size, sequence length, precision, parallelism and checkpointing; for inference, they vary concurrency, GPU frequency, KV-cache and weight , prompt and output lengths, and request-arrival patterns. They also define power-grid-facing metrics and an power&energy to extrapolate beyond measured settings. The authors present the dataset as a foundation for modeling, forecasting and managing AI compute’s changing electrical behavior. Whether these measurements and extrapolations generalize to other hardware and real-world deployments remains open.

Original source

cs.AI · Article

Source details

Original source date: Oct 28, 2026 (2026-10-28).

Date basis: Date basis not provided.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z. First observed: 2026-10-30T06:40:59.359Z. Retrieved: 2026-10-31T05:02:44.526Z.

Limits

The abstract does not establish how well the measurements or generalize beyond the profiled platforms, models and workloads. The evidence is the paper’s abstract and does not report validation results for forecasts or effects on power-grid operations.

Open question

How well do the dataset’s measurements and predict power behavior on hardware and workloads beyond those profiled?

Source-stated

The authors introduce an open dataset of time-resolved, per-GPU power traces for LLM fine-tuning and inference, sampled every 100 ms and paired with workload and system metadata.

an open dataset of time-resolved, per-GPU power traces for LLM fine-tuning and inference, sampled every 100\,ms on varying NVIDIA platforms paired with complete workload and system metadata.

Source-stated

The authors argue that total energy measurements alone leave important time-varying power behavior poorly characterized, including peaks, ramps and synchronized fluctuations.

Existing energy benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) report aggregate quantities such as joules per token and rarely release the underlying time-series measurements, leaving these power dynamics poorly characterized

Source-stated

The dataset varies workloads and system settings for both fine-tuning and inference.

controlled sweeps over batch size, sequence length, precision, parallelism, and checkpointing. For inference, it covers variations in concurrency, GPU frequency, KV-cache and weight quantization

Source-stated

The authors define power-grid-facing metrics and an AI-compute power and energy scaling law for extrapolating beyond measured settings.

we define power-grid-facing metrics as well as AI-compute power\&energy scaling law for extrapolating beyond the measured settings.

Source-stated

The paper presents the dataset as a basis for modeling, forecasting and managing AI compute’s changing electrical behavior.

provides a dataset foundation for modeling, forecasting, and managing the fast-changing electrical behavior of AI compute.

Source and contributor context

Wang, Jiansheng, Singh, Jaskeerat, Xu, Haochen, Li, Xinyi, Yan, Mingyuan, Liu, Shaohui, Li, Yuzhuo, Chen, Yize, Cui, Wenqi · Article author

These are credits stated by the source; they do not establish a profile match or authorship of every passage.

Source media

No suitable media was found by the supported page extraction.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

Large language model

A language model with many learned numerical settings, used to process and generate language.

Graphics processing unit

A chip that performs many calculations at once; the main hardware used to train and run AI models.

Fine-tuning

Further training of an existing model to adapt it to a particular task or use.

Quantization

Storing a model's numbers at lower precision so it uses less memory and runs faster, sometimes at a cost in accuracy.

AI compute

The computing resources, meaning chips, data centers and electricity, used to train or run AI models.

Scaling laws

Observed patterns in which model performance improves predictably as data, model size and computation grow.

arXiv

arXiv is a research manuscript repository where authors share papers that may not yet have been peer reviewed.

NVIDIA

NVIDIA develops processors, networking and software used for AI, graphics and scientific computing.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: b7f44020-513e-4dff-8c25-2166a0eda440.

Prepared by gpt-6-luna; grounding review by gpt-6-luna.

Source check: passed by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: material_development.

Observation: ac496e48791355329d3753dad3b7572b5441e54267985fefec5eb13299e2dc72. Source text hash: 0978b65450afe78e74aedb630b41bfd634595cb1a954ff555c0e35186b7a95b3.

passed · 2026-10-31T05:03:38.226Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Publication: b7f44020-513e-4dff-8c25-2166a0eda440

attribution — pass: The reading consistently attributes the dataset, its motivation, the metrics and the scaling law to the arXiv paper's authors. It does not present their claims as established fact or as Escape Meridian's view.

We introduce LLM-PowerTrace, an open dataset of time-resolved, per-GPU power traces for LLM fine-tuning and inference

summary — pass: The summary leads with the actor and the new dataset. It explains in plain language why time-varying power draw matters beyond total energy: peaks, ramps and synchronized fluctuations affecting data centers and grids. Technical terms such as KV-cache, quantization and scaling law are kept exactly, which suits tooltips, and the central meaning stays readable. The title, question and stated open issue follow from the evidence without overstating it.

Its impacts on data center infrastructure and power grids depend not only on total energy consumption, but also on how their power draw moves over sub-second to minute timescales

date — pass: The originalPublished date of 2026-10-28 matches the v1 submission date on the arXiv page. The later feed date of October 31 is correctly not used.

[Submitted on 28 Oct 2026]

support — pass: Each claim matches the abstract with exact excerpts. The reading frames the grid significance as the authors' argument. It does not claim demonstrated grid benefits, and it correctly notes that the evidence does not show generalization beyond the profiled NVIDIA platforms or any forecast validation. No unsupported benefits, costs or stakeholders are invented.

we define power-grid-facing metrics as well as AI-compute power\&energy scaling law for extrapolating beyond the measured settings.

media — pass: The selected media is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page, the original source. No better direct media was found.

Challenge or correct this reading

Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.