Skip to content
Escape
Meridian

The future is still open.

Ben Thompson · Oct 3, 2025

Ben Thompson revisits his AI video takes in Stratechery

Markdown · JSON · Original source

Ben Thompson’s Stratechery newsletter was published on October 3, 2025. Thompson says he was wrong about his earlier takes on MetaAI Vibes and Sora, and tells readers not to read those pieces but to listen to a Sharp Tech episode instead. He says the episode explains why his views were wrong and what that means for the future of AI and , as well as problems facing Meta. The newsletter does not give the episode’s reasoning or identify which parts of his earlier analysis he changed; readers are directed to the episode for that account.

Headline and summary by Escape Meridian, prepared by Luna from the attributed source. A source check is not independent confirmation of the source’s claims.

Ben ThompsonArticle · stratechery.comOpen original source

Original source

Ben Thompson · Article

Source details

Original source date: Oct 3, 2025 (2025-10-03T10:00:00+00:00).

Date basis: Date stated on the publisher’s page.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T21:08:23.667Z. First observed: 2026-11-10T12:18:08.649Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T12:19:39.660Z.

Referenced by

Recorded citations and public file attachments. A reference alone does not establish agreement or influence.

No public references recorded here yet.

Reference data (JSON)

Limits

Text as retrieved on November 10, 2026; originally published October 3, 2025. This newsletter overview does not provide the episode’s reasoning or specify which parts of Thompson’s earlier views he changed.

Open question

What reasoning in the Sharp Tech episode led Thompson to revise his views on MetaAI Vibes and Sora?

Source-stated

Ben Thompson says his earlier takes on MetaAI Vibes and Sora were wrong, and directs readers to a Sharp Tech episode for his explanation.

DON’T READ EITHER OF THEM. Instead, listen to this week’s episode of Sharp Tech, where I dig deep to understand why my takes were wrong

Source-stated

Thompson says his revised views have implications for the future of AI and OpenAI, and for problems facing Meta.

what that means for not just the future of AI (and OpenAI), but also the suddenly significant problems facing Meta.

Source and contributor context

Ben Thompson · Publisher

The publisher is identified here. No individual author has been inferred.

Source media

Media retrieval status: unchecked.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

OpenAI

OpenAI develops AI models and products and publishes research, release announcements and evaluations.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 07f10207-6847-5958-4477-9792beb0acef.

Prepared by openai/gpt-6-luna; grounding review by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T21:03:37.427Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: bridge_admitted_by_model, second_opinion_categorical.

Observation: 26aeb03bc51b82655cfdf29fe6f0086bfbc47dddc779534391604e88c3381989. Source text hash: 91480a5284858f0a642f7709ad603d1805b5ac61688654d25f9ec37708ed8058.

Revision and source-check history

Version 1 · 2026-11-11T21:08:23.667Z

Ben Thompson revisits his AI video takes in Stratechery

Ben Thompson’s Stratechery newsletter was published on October 3, 2025. Thompson says he was wrong about his earlier takes on MetaAI Vibes and Sora, and tells readers not to read those pieces but to listen to a Sharp Tech episode instead. He says the episode explains why his views were wrong and what that means for the future of AI and , as well as problems facing Meta. The newsletter does not give the episode’s reasoning or identify which parts of his earlier analysis he changed; readers are directed to the episode for that account.

Original source

Ben Thompson · Article

Source details

Original source date: Oct 3, 2025 (2025-10-03T10:00:00+00:00).

Date basis: Date stated on the publisher’s page.

Added to Escape Meridian: 2026-11-11T21:08:23.667Z. First observed: 2026-11-10T12:18:08.649Z. Retrieved: 2026-11-10T12:19:39.660Z.

Limits

Text as retrieved on November 10, 2026; originally published October 3, 2025. This newsletter overview does not provide the episode’s reasoning or specify which parts of Thompson’s earlier views he changed.

Open question

What reasoning in the Sharp Tech episode led Thompson to revise his views on MetaAI Vibes and Sora?

Source-stated

Ben Thompson says his earlier takes on MetaAI Vibes and Sora were wrong, and directs readers to a Sharp Tech episode for his explanation.

DON’T READ EITHER OF THEM. Instead, listen to this week’s episode of Sharp Tech, where I dig deep to understand why my takes were wrong

Source-stated

Thompson says his revised views have implications for the future of AI and OpenAI, and for problems facing Meta.

what that means for not just the future of AI (and OpenAI), but also the suddenly significant problems facing Meta.

Source and contributor context

Ben Thompson · Publisher

The publisher is identified here. No individual author has been inferred.

Source media

Media retrieval status: unchecked.

Terms and references

Reference context selected by Escape Meridian; separate from source evidence. Entity mentions do not establish authorship, involvement or endorsement.

OpenAI

OpenAI develops AI models and products and publishes research, release announcements and evaluations.

Editorial provenance

Version 1. Publication ID: 07f10207-6847-5958-4477-9792beb0acef.

Prepared by openai/gpt-6-luna; grounding review by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5.

Source check: uncertain by anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 on 2026-11-11T21:03:37.427Z. This checks fidelity to the source, not whether its claims are independently true.

Editorial selection: accept; reasons: bridge_admitted_by_model, second_opinion_categorical.

Observation: 26aeb03bc51b82655cfdf29fe6f0086bfbc47dddc779534391604e88c3381989. Source text hash: 91480a5284858f0a642f7709ad603d1805b5ac61688654d25f9ec37708ed8058.

uncertain · 2026-11-11T21:03:37.427Z · anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Publication: 07f10207-6847-5958-4477-9792beb0acef

attribution — pass: This is a single newsletter issue with commentary in the authors' own words, not a bare listing. The blurb about the AI Slop Era is signed by Ben Thompson, so the reading correctly attributes the self-correction to him.

what that means for not just the future of AI (and OpenAI), but also the suddenly significant problems facing Meta. — Ben Thompson

summary — uncertain: Central terms are not explained, and the definitions list is empty. The reading never says that MetaAI Vibes is Meta's AI video feed, that Sora is OpenAI's AI video app, or that Sharp Tech is a podcast. The source also states the earlier takes: Thompson found Vibes compelling and was unsure about Sora. Without that, a general reader cannot tell what he reversed. Smallest repair: add one-line identifications of Vibes, Sora and Sharp Tech, and note his earlier positions as described in the issue.

The Internet hates Vibes, MetaAI’s new AI video feed, but I find it compelling and a fascinating look at a VR future.

date — pass: The reading states October 3, 2025, which matches the UTC day of the evidence instant. It discloses the later retrieval and adds no hindsight framing. Later-dated items, such as the reference to the fourth plenum later this month, are not used.

support — pass: Both claims quote the source directly and remain attributed to Thompson. The limitation that the episode's reasoning is not given is accurate, and there are no unsupported benefits, costs or implications.

DON’T READ EITHER OF THEM. Instead, listen to this week’s episode of Sharp Tech, where I dig deep to understand why my takes were wrong

media — pass: No media was selected and no verified candidates were supplied, so nothing is misidentified.

Challenge or correct this reading

Send a correction or an opposing source with this reading’s URL. Disagreement and uncertainty can remain unresolved.