arXiv cs.AI: Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs

arXiv cs.AI: Evolutionary System Prompt Learning for Reinforcement Learning in LLMs

Authors Lunjun Zhang, Ryan Chen, and Bradly C. Stadie propose Evolutionary System Prompt Learning (E-SPL), which updates a model’s weights through reinforcement learning (RL) while evolving its system prompts through self-reflection. They describe the prompts as a place for interpretable declarative knowledge, alongside procedural knowledge in the weights. Their method samples trajectories under multiple system prompts in parallel, then uses those trajectories for both updates. The authors argue that these two kinds of updates work together: in their reported easy-to-hard generalization setting, E-SPL raises RL success on BeyondAIME from 38.8% to 45.1%. They also report gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025, and agentic search, and say E-SPL outperforms RL-only and evolution-only baselines across their settings. The results make the paper’s central idea concrete: self-improvement need not choose between changing a model’s weights and changing its instructions; the authors report gains from doing both. The supplied abstract gives benchmark results but does not explain the experimental methods in detail.

Publication: 990b28a4-0ef7-4d15-8ac6-0eabc80e1032

attribution — pass: The method, results, and synergy claim are attributed to authors Lunjun Zhang, Ryan Chen and Bradly C. Stadie, matching the arXiv page. Reported numbers are framed as the authors' reports, not established facts.

Authors:Lunjun Zhang, Ryan Chen, Bradly C. Stadie

summary — uncertain: The summary is faithful, but central jargon may block a non-specialist: weights, system prompts, trajectories, self-reflection, and the benchmarks AIME 2025, BeyondAIME, HMMT 2025 and agentic search are never explained in plain language. Readers are not told these are math-competition and search-task benchmarks, or that weights are the model's learned parameters while a system prompt is its standing written instructions. 'Work together' also softens the authors' 'deeply synergistic.' Smallest repair: confirm term-library tooltips exist for these terms, or add brief glosses. Keep the authors' wording 'deeply synergistic.'

demonstrating that weight updates and context updates are deeply synergistic and can together yield gains in generalization that neither achieves alone

date — pass: originalPublished is 2026-02-16, matching the v1 submission date. It is not the 4 Nov 2026 v4 revision or the November feed date.

[Submitted on 16 Feb 2026 (v1), last revised 4 Nov 2026 (this version, v4)]

support — pass: All four claims are supported by the abstract excerpts. The figures 38.8% to 45.1%, and the gains on AIME 2025, HMMT 2025 and agentic search, match the abstract. The baselines claim also matches. The limitations correctly note that the evidence is abstract-level only. The question is a genuine open issue rather than a leading claim. No benefits or costs are invented.

Across all settings, E-SPL outperforms both RL-only and evolution-only baselines

media — pass: The selected media ID is the verified direct link to the arXiv abstract page. That is the original source and the most direct access point.