Chen, Zhu and Zheng’s arXiv cs.AI paper: people who favor art are more likely to think a human made it

Chen, Zhu and Zheng’s arXiv cs.AI paper: people who favor art are more likely to think a human made it

In a paper submitted to arXiv on 28 October 2026, Zihan Chen, Di Zhu and Lei Nico Zheng report that people’s favorite images were more likely to be judged human-made, even when generated by AI. In an online test, 11,123 people judged 50 pictures and were asked to choose favorites. Among the 9,152 respondents who judged their favorite, a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was that respondent’s favorite, holding the respondent and picture fixed. The authors say the association appeared for both AI-generated and human-made favorites and across all 50 pictures. Respondents most negative about AI art chose fewer AI-generated favorites, but more often believed those favorites were human-made. In every opinion group, a third to two fifths named an AI-generated favorite they believed human-made. The authors also reanalyzed an experiment in which 230 people rated AI-generated poems before judging who wrote them, and found the same pattern, though those poems received higher ratings. The results suggest that, when authorship is hidden, liking and perceived human authorship can travel together. The authors say this qualifies research on bias against AI art that uses explicit labels, and may inform AI disclosure policy.

Publication: 4333e479-f083-4fe9-80d5-ee045c24a935

attribution — pass: The paper is correctly attributed to Zihan Chen, Di Zhu and Lei Nico Zheng on arXiv. Its findings are framed as the authors' reports. The primary category is cs.HC, cross-listed to cs.AI; the 'arXiv cs.AI' label follows the publisher metadata and is not a material misattribution.

Authors:Zihan Chen, Di Zhu, Lei Nico Zheng

summary — uncertain: Figures are accurate, but two fidelity gaps remain. First, the title 'people who favor art are more likely to think a human made it' can be misread as art lovers in general; the finding is about a respondent's own favourite picture. Second, the reading drops the authors' central interpretation that aesthetic response may serve as evidence of a human maker and that beliefs about the maker shape enjoyment. Smallest repair: retitle to 'people's favourite pictures are more likely to be judged human-made' and add the authors' two-way interpretation as their claim. Optionally add that skeptics' misjudgments were partly because others also judged those pictures human.

consistent with aesthetic response serving as evidence of a human maker and with beliefs about the maker shaping enjoyment

date — pass: originalPublished 2026-10-28 matches the v1 submission date. The draft's date sentence is consistent with it.

[Submitted on 28 Oct 2026]

support — pass: All claims match the abstract: 11,123 participants, 50 pictures, the 22.1-point association with fixed effects, positive for all pictures, the opinion-group results, and the poetry reanalysis with 230 people. Softening 'inform' to 'may inform' is cautious, not an exaggeration. The limitations correctly note that the association is not causal. The disclosure question follows from the evidence without assuming an answer.

a picture was 22.1 percentage points more likely to be judged human-made when it was the respondent's favourite, holding respondent and picture fixed

media — pass: The selected media is the verified arXiv abstract page for this paper, which is the direct original source.